An optical satellite-based analysis of phenology and post-fire vegetation recovery in UK upland moorlands

IF 5.4 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Pia Labenski , Gail Millin-Chalabi , Ana María Pacheco-Pascagaza , Johannes Antenor Senn , Fabian Ewald Fassnacht , Gareth D. Clay
{"title":"An optical satellite-based analysis of phenology and post-fire vegetation recovery in UK upland moorlands","authors":"Pia Labenski ,&nbsp;Gail Millin-Chalabi ,&nbsp;Ana María Pacheco-Pascagaza ,&nbsp;Johannes Antenor Senn ,&nbsp;Fabian Ewald Fassnacht ,&nbsp;Gareth D. Clay","doi":"10.1016/j.indic.2024.100492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Vegetation fuel dynamics in the UK's upland moorlands are important in determining landscape susceptibility to wildfire. Changes in fuel availability are influenced by phenology, land management activities or disturbances such as wildfires. Monitoring such changes is therefore essential to assess wildfire risks and impacts. This study used vegetation indices (VIs) derived from Sentinel-2 time series (2017–2023) and harmonic modelling to capture the phenology of key fuel properties and monitor post-fire vegetation recovery in four upland land cover types (acid grassland, heather, heather grassland, bog). We identified periods of high flammability, assessed the impact of wildfires on the spectral signal, and determined the time for spectral recovery as well as potential drivers of recovery times. Results showed the period of highest flammability from mid-February to early May in acid grassland, extending to early June in heather and heather grassland, and late June in bog. Summer fires caused more pronounced changes in fuel properties than spring fires, particularly in moisture-related VIs. Graminoid-dominated areas recovered rapidly (under a year), matching field observations, while dwarf shrub-dominated areas required up to three years, consistent with measurements of vegetation cover on burned areas but not with height. Spectral recovery times were primarily explained by land cover class, burn severity, season, and winter snow cover (R2 = 0.66). Field data highlighted pre-fire stand age's role in heather recovery and grasses' impact on spectral signals. This study improves understanding of fuel dynamics in upland moorlands through satellite monitoring, providing critical insights for more effective wildfire risk assessments and management strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36171,"journal":{"name":"Environmental and Sustainability Indicators","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental and Sustainability Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665972724001600","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Vegetation fuel dynamics in the UK's upland moorlands are important in determining landscape susceptibility to wildfire. Changes in fuel availability are influenced by phenology, land management activities or disturbances such as wildfires. Monitoring such changes is therefore essential to assess wildfire risks and impacts. This study used vegetation indices (VIs) derived from Sentinel-2 time series (2017–2023) and harmonic modelling to capture the phenology of key fuel properties and monitor post-fire vegetation recovery in four upland land cover types (acid grassland, heather, heather grassland, bog). We identified periods of high flammability, assessed the impact of wildfires on the spectral signal, and determined the time for spectral recovery as well as potential drivers of recovery times. Results showed the period of highest flammability from mid-February to early May in acid grassland, extending to early June in heather and heather grassland, and late June in bog. Summer fires caused more pronounced changes in fuel properties than spring fires, particularly in moisture-related VIs. Graminoid-dominated areas recovered rapidly (under a year), matching field observations, while dwarf shrub-dominated areas required up to three years, consistent with measurements of vegetation cover on burned areas but not with height. Spectral recovery times were primarily explained by land cover class, burn severity, season, and winter snow cover (R2 = 0.66). Field data highlighted pre-fire stand age's role in heather recovery and grasses' impact on spectral signals. This study improves understanding of fuel dynamics in upland moorlands through satellite monitoring, providing critical insights for more effective wildfire risk assessments and management strategies.
基于光学卫星的英国高地荒原物候和火后植被恢复分析
英国高地沼泽地的植被燃料动态对决定地貌对野火的易感性非常重要。燃料可用性的变化受到物候、土地管理活动或野火等干扰的影响。因此,监测此类变化对于评估野火风险和影响至关重要。本研究利用从哨兵-2 时间序列(2017-2023 年)和谐波建模得出的植被指数(VIs)来捕捉关键燃料特性的物候变化,并监测四种高地土地覆被类型(酸性草地、石楠、石楠草地、沼泽)的火后植被恢复情况。我们确定了高易燃期,评估了野火对光谱信号的影响,并确定了光谱恢复的时间以及影响恢复时间的潜在因素。结果显示,酸性草地的易燃性最高时段为 2 月中旬至 5 月初,石楠和石楠草地的易燃性最高时段为 6 月初,沼泽的易燃性最高时段为 6 月下旬。与春季火灾相比,夏季火灾造成的燃料特性变化更为明显,尤其是在与湿度有关的VI方面。以禾本科植物为主的地区恢复得很快(不到一年),这与实地观察结果一致,而以矮灌木为主的地区则需要长达三年的时间,这与燃烧地区植被覆盖度的测量结果一致,但与高度无关。光谱恢复时间主要由土地覆被等级、燃烧严重程度、季节和冬季积雪覆盖率(R2 = 0.66)来解释。实地数据强调了火前林分年龄在石楠恢复中的作用以及草对光谱信号的影响。这项研究通过卫星监测提高了人们对高地荒原燃料动态的认识,为更有效的野火风险评估和管理策略提供了重要依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
2.30%
发文量
49
审稿时长
57 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信