Mingxin Lin , Jing Zhang , Jianxing Cai , Jumei Liu , Min Zhu , Ke Li , Miaoyun Hu , Chenxi Li , Huiming Ye
{"title":"Performance evaluation of Eu3+-based CRP/SAA and PCT/IL-6 lateral flow immunoassay kits and their diagnostic value in respiratory tract infections","authors":"Mingxin Lin , Jing Zhang , Jianxing Cai , Jumei Liu , Min Zhu , Ke Li , Miaoyun Hu , Chenxi Li , Huiming Ye","doi":"10.1016/j.plabm.2024.e00432","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Respiratory infections are among the most common infectious diseases, resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. C-reactive protein (CRP), serum amyloid A (SAA), procalcitonin (PCT), and interleukin-6 (IL-6) are advantageous for diagnosing respiratory tract infections. This study assessed the analytical performance and accuracy of new kits for Eu3<sup>+</sup>-based CRP/SAA and PCT/IL-6 lateral flow immunoassay and its diagnostic value in respiratory tract infections.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study evaluated the detection performance of a test kit using guidelines from the Center for Medical Device Evaluation (CMDE) and the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). The test results were compared to those of the commercial kits (CRP: Mindray; SAA: Norman; PCT: Shanghai Upper; IL-6: Wantai BioPharm). A total of 156 patients with respiratory tract infections (53 with bacterial infections (Bac group); 50 with viral infections (Vir group); and 53 with co-infections (Bac + Vir group)) were enrolled, along with 50 healthy controls (HC group). Venous blood samples were collected to measure levels of SAA, PCT, CRP, and IL-6 using both the test and commercial kits. The diagnostic value of these biomarkers was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Correlation analysis demonstrated a strong concordance between the test kits and commercial kits (CRP: r = 0.9396, P < 0.0001; SAA: r = 0.8986, P < 0.0001; PCT: r = 0.9594, P < 0.0001; IL-6: r = 0.9009, P < 0.0001). The diagnostic performance of the test kits in identifying bacterial, viral, and co-infections was highly consistent with that of the commercial kit.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The Eu3<sup>+</sup>-based CRP/SAA and PCT/IL-6 lateral flow immunoassay test kits demonstrated high levels of consistency with commercial kits in terms of quantitative outcomes and diagnostic performance for respiratory tract infections.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20421,"journal":{"name":"Practical Laboratory Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Practical Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352551724000787","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
Respiratory infections are among the most common infectious diseases, resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. C-reactive protein (CRP), serum amyloid A (SAA), procalcitonin (PCT), and interleukin-6 (IL-6) are advantageous for diagnosing respiratory tract infections. This study assessed the analytical performance and accuracy of new kits for Eu3+-based CRP/SAA and PCT/IL-6 lateral flow immunoassay and its diagnostic value in respiratory tract infections.
Methods
This study evaluated the detection performance of a test kit using guidelines from the Center for Medical Device Evaluation (CMDE) and the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). The test results were compared to those of the commercial kits (CRP: Mindray; SAA: Norman; PCT: Shanghai Upper; IL-6: Wantai BioPharm). A total of 156 patients with respiratory tract infections (53 with bacterial infections (Bac group); 50 with viral infections (Vir group); and 53 with co-infections (Bac + Vir group)) were enrolled, along with 50 healthy controls (HC group). Venous blood samples were collected to measure levels of SAA, PCT, CRP, and IL-6 using both the test and commercial kits. The diagnostic value of these biomarkers was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.
Results
Correlation analysis demonstrated a strong concordance between the test kits and commercial kits (CRP: r = 0.9396, P < 0.0001; SAA: r = 0.8986, P < 0.0001; PCT: r = 0.9594, P < 0.0001; IL-6: r = 0.9009, P < 0.0001). The diagnostic performance of the test kits in identifying bacterial, viral, and co-infections was highly consistent with that of the commercial kit.
Conclusions
The Eu3+-based CRP/SAA and PCT/IL-6 lateral flow immunoassay test kits demonstrated high levels of consistency with commercial kits in terms of quantitative outcomes and diagnostic performance for respiratory tract infections.
期刊介绍:
Practical Laboratory Medicine is a high-quality, peer-reviewed, international open-access journal publishing original research, new methods and critical evaluations, case reports and short papers in the fields of clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine. The objective of the journal is to provide practical information of immediate relevance to workers in clinical laboratories. The primary scope of the journal covers clinical chemistry, hematology, molecular biology and genetics relevant to laboratory medicine, microbiology, immunology, therapeutic drug monitoring and toxicology, laboratory management and informatics. We welcome papers which describe critical evaluations of biomarkers and their role in the diagnosis and treatment of clinically significant disease, validation of commercial and in-house IVD methods, method comparisons, interference reports, the development of new reagents and reference materials, reference range studies and regulatory compliance reports. Manuscripts describing the development of new methods applicable to laboratory medicine (including point-of-care testing) are particularly encouraged, even if preliminary or small scale.