Quantitative estimation of diphtheria and tetanus toxoids. 2. Single radial immuno-diffusion tests (Mancini) and rocket immuno-electrophoresis test in comparison with the flocculation test

Lene Ljungqvist , Jørn Lyng
{"title":"Quantitative estimation of diphtheria and tetanus toxoids. 2. Single radial immuno-diffusion tests (Mancini) and rocket immuno-electrophoresis test in comparison with the flocculation test","authors":"Lene Ljungqvist ,&nbsp;Jørn Lyng","doi":"10.1016/0092-1157(87)90019-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The concentration in Lf units, of an unknown diphtheria or tetanus toxoid preparation is estimated in the flocculation test relative to reference preparations of tetanus and diphtheria antitoxins, respectively. By replacing the antitoxin reference preparations with toxoid reference preparations it should be possible to use immunological methods other than the flocculation test for the quantitative estimation of toxoids in Lf units.</p><p>A number of diphtheria and tetanus toxoids were tested by rocket immuno-electrophoresis and single radial immuno-diffusion (Mancini test). The concentrations of the unknown toxoids were expressed relative to a diphtheria toxoid calibrated in Lf units (DIFT) and a tetanus toxoid calibrated in Lf units (TEFT), respectively. These two toxoid preparations are regarded as candidates for establishment as international standard preparations. The results obtained in the two tests were compared with those obtained in the flocculation test. In most cases the differences between the results did not exceed 10%. It is concluded, therefore, that the rocket electrophoresis or the radial immuno-diffusion tests can be used as alternatives to the flocculation test.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":75991,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biological standardization","volume":"15 1","pages":"Pages 79-86"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0092-1157(87)90019-9","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biological standardization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0092115787900199","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

The concentration in Lf units, of an unknown diphtheria or tetanus toxoid preparation is estimated in the flocculation test relative to reference preparations of tetanus and diphtheria antitoxins, respectively. By replacing the antitoxin reference preparations with toxoid reference preparations it should be possible to use immunological methods other than the flocculation test for the quantitative estimation of toxoids in Lf units.

A number of diphtheria and tetanus toxoids were tested by rocket immuno-electrophoresis and single radial immuno-diffusion (Mancini test). The concentrations of the unknown toxoids were expressed relative to a diphtheria toxoid calibrated in Lf units (DIFT) and a tetanus toxoid calibrated in Lf units (TEFT), respectively. These two toxoid preparations are regarded as candidates for establishment as international standard preparations. The results obtained in the two tests were compared with those obtained in the flocculation test. In most cases the differences between the results did not exceed 10%. It is concluded, therefore, that the rocket electrophoresis or the radial immuno-diffusion tests can be used as alternatives to the flocculation test.

白喉和破伤风类毒素的定量估计。2. 单径向免疫扩散试验(Mancini)和火箭免疫电泳试验与絮凝试验的比较
在絮凝试验中,一种未知白喉或破伤风类毒素制剂的Lf单位浓度分别相对于破伤风和白喉抗毒素的参比制剂进行估算。用类毒素标准制剂代替抗毒素标准制剂,可采用除絮凝试验外的免疫学方法定量估计Lf单位中类毒素的含量。采用火箭免疫电泳法和单径向免疫扩散法(Mancini试验)对多种白喉、破伤风类毒素进行了检测。未知类毒素的浓度分别相对于以Lf单位(DIFT)校准的白喉类毒素和以Lf单位(TEFT)校准的破伤风类毒素表示。这两种类毒素制剂被认为是建立国际标准制剂的候选者。将两种试验结果与絮凝试验结果进行了比较。在大多数情况下,结果之间的差异不超过10%。因此,火箭电泳或径向免疫扩散试验可作为絮凝试验的替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信