Outcomes and implications of a 12-year cross-sectional study on diagnosing and recognizing skin tumors in primary care.

IF 0.6 Q4 DERMATOLOGY
Mario Ćurković, Kristina Kralik, Nika Ćurković
{"title":"Outcomes and implications of a 12-year cross-sectional study on diagnosing and recognizing skin tumors in primary care.","authors":"Mario Ćurković, Kristina Kralik, Nika Ćurković","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Skin cancer, a significant global health issue, requires prompt detection and management, particularly among the elderly. Primary care physicians play a critical role in early diagnosis because they are often the first to evaluate patients with skin lesions. Accurate diagnosis by family physicians is essential for effective treatment and improved patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Over a 12-year period, this study analyzed 125 samples from 89 patients that presented with visible skin changes or suspicious lesions identified during routine examinations. Initial working diagnoses made by family physicians were compared to final pathohistological diagnoses (PHD).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study found a significant difference between working diagnoses and final PHDs for malignant versus benign cases, with an accuracy of 83.3% and statistical significance (p = 0.04). A difference of 12.9% was observed, indicating areas for improvement. The diagnostic effectiveness for premalignant versus benign cases is high (accuracy of 88.2%), but without statistical significance (p = 0.50), and it suggests that these differences are not clinically relevant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Primary care physicians demonstrate high accuracy in identifying malignant skin conditions, which is crucial for effective skin cancer management. However, improving diagnostic accuracy, particularly to reduce the misclassification of benign conditions as malignant, remains necessary. Continued training and development are essential to further enhance diagnostic precision for all skin conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":45914,"journal":{"name":"Acta Dermatovenerologica Alpina Pannonica et Adriatica","volume":"33 3","pages":"127-132"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Dermatovenerologica Alpina Pannonica et Adriatica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Skin cancer, a significant global health issue, requires prompt detection and management, particularly among the elderly. Primary care physicians play a critical role in early diagnosis because they are often the first to evaluate patients with skin lesions. Accurate diagnosis by family physicians is essential for effective treatment and improved patient outcomes.

Methods: Over a 12-year period, this study analyzed 125 samples from 89 patients that presented with visible skin changes or suspicious lesions identified during routine examinations. Initial working diagnoses made by family physicians were compared to final pathohistological diagnoses (PHD).

Results: The study found a significant difference between working diagnoses and final PHDs for malignant versus benign cases, with an accuracy of 83.3% and statistical significance (p = 0.04). A difference of 12.9% was observed, indicating areas for improvement. The diagnostic effectiveness for premalignant versus benign cases is high (accuracy of 88.2%), but without statistical significance (p = 0.50), and it suggests that these differences are not clinically relevant.

Conclusions: Primary care physicians demonstrate high accuracy in identifying malignant skin conditions, which is crucial for effective skin cancer management. However, improving diagnostic accuracy, particularly to reduce the misclassification of benign conditions as malignant, remains necessary. Continued training and development are essential to further enhance diagnostic precision for all skin conditions.

一项为期 12 年的横断面研究对基层医疗机构诊断和识别皮肤肿瘤的结果和影响。
简介:皮肤癌是一个重要的全球性健康问题,需要及时发现和治疗,尤其是在老年人中:皮肤癌是一个重要的全球性健康问题,需要及时发现和治疗,尤其是在老年人中。初级保健医生在早期诊断中起着至关重要的作用,因为他们通常是第一个对皮肤损伤患者进行评估的人。家庭医生的准确诊断对于有效治疗和改善患者预后至关重要:在 12 年的时间里,这项研究分析了 89 名患者的 125 份样本,这些患者在常规检查中发现了明显的皮肤变化或可疑病变。将家庭医生做出的初步工作诊断与最终病理组织学诊断(PHD)进行了比较:研究发现,恶性病例与良性病例的工作诊断和最终病理组织学诊断之间存在明显差异,准确率为 83.3%,具有统计学意义(P = 0.04)。观察到的差异为 12.9%,表明有需要改进的地方。恶性前病例与良性病例的诊断效果较高(准确率为 88.2%),但无统计学意义(p = 0.50),这表明这些差异与临床无关:结论:初级保健医生识别恶性皮肤病的准确率很高,这对有效治疗皮肤癌至关重要。然而,提高诊断的准确性,尤其是减少将良性病症误诊为恶性病症的情况,仍然很有必要。持续的培训和发展对于进一步提高所有皮肤病的诊断准确性至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
38
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信