Caracterización clínica de pacientes con coaliciones tarsianas. Experiencia de 12 años en hospital de alta complejidad

Q3 Medicine
E. Fernández-Rojas , M. Monteagudo de la Rosa , P. Martínez de Albornoz Torrente , E. Maceira Suárez
{"title":"Caracterización clínica de pacientes con coaliciones tarsianas. Experiencia de 12 años en hospital de alta complejidad","authors":"E. Fernández-Rojas ,&nbsp;M. Monteagudo de la Rosa ,&nbsp;P. Martínez de Albornoz Torrente ,&nbsp;E. Maceira Suárez","doi":"10.1016/j.recot.2024.09.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Tarsal coalitions are aberrant unions of two or more tarsal bones which may condition variable foot and ankle conditions. Their incidence is also variable but most frequently diagnosed coalitions are talocalcaneal and calcaneonavicular. This article aims to evaluate clinical and epidemiological characteristics of patients diagnosed with tarsal coalitions.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>Cross-sectional descriptive study of patients with tarsal coalitions from August 2007 to January 2020 in a private University Hospital in Madrid, Spain. Data on age, sex, type of coalition according to anatomical location and tissue type, laterality and hindfoot condition and symptoms were obtained and analyzed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 57 patients identified (80 feet), there were 31 males (54.4%) and 26 females (45.6%). Average age was 36.9 years. The total number of coalitions was 85. There were 48 bilateral coalitions (56,5%). Fifty-two talocalcaneal coalitions (TCC) (61.2%), 32 calcaneonavicular coalitions (CNC) (37.6%) and 1 calcaneocuboid coalition (1.2%) were registered. Our series showed 36 osseous coalitions (42.4%) and 49 fibrocartilaginous coalitions (57.6%). When evaluated separately, 35 of the TCC were osseous (67.3%) and 17 were fibrocartilaginous (32.7%); 1 of the CNC was osseous (3.1%) and 31 were fibrocartilaginous (96.9%).</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>In our review, TCC was the most frequent subtype, with the majority being the bony in nature. In the distribution according to sex, a higher incidence of males is found within the CCN group (Fisher's Exact test, <em>P</em>=.032). Some of the results obtained are different from what was previously reported in the literature, which gives rise to new studies that explain this difference in our population.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":39664,"journal":{"name":"Revista Espanola de Cirugia Ortopedica y Traumatologia","volume":"69 3","pages":"Pages 260-266"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Espanola de Cirugia Ortopedica y Traumatologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S188844152400153X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Tarsal coalitions are aberrant unions of two or more tarsal bones which may condition variable foot and ankle conditions. Their incidence is also variable but most frequently diagnosed coalitions are talocalcaneal and calcaneonavicular. This article aims to evaluate clinical and epidemiological characteristics of patients diagnosed with tarsal coalitions.

Materials and methods

Cross-sectional descriptive study of patients with tarsal coalitions from August 2007 to January 2020 in a private University Hospital in Madrid, Spain. Data on age, sex, type of coalition according to anatomical location and tissue type, laterality and hindfoot condition and symptoms were obtained and analyzed.

Results

Of the 57 patients identified (80 feet), there were 31 males (54.4%) and 26 females (45.6%). Average age was 36.9 years. The total number of coalitions was 85. There were 48 bilateral coalitions (56,5%). Fifty-two talocalcaneal coalitions (TCC) (61.2%), 32 calcaneonavicular coalitions (CNC) (37.6%) and 1 calcaneocuboid coalition (1.2%) were registered. Our series showed 36 osseous coalitions (42.4%) and 49 fibrocartilaginous coalitions (57.6%). When evaluated separately, 35 of the TCC were osseous (67.3%) and 17 were fibrocartilaginous (32.7%); 1 of the CNC was osseous (3.1%) and 31 were fibrocartilaginous (96.9%).

Discussion

In our review, TCC was the most frequent subtype, with the majority being the bony in nature. In the distribution according to sex, a higher incidence of males is found within the CCN group (Fisher's Exact test, P=.032). Some of the results obtained are different from what was previously reported in the literature, which gives rise to new studies that explain this difference in our population.
跗骨联合患者的临床特征。
背景:跗骨联合是两块或多块跗骨的异常联合,可能会导致不同的足踝病症。跗骨联合的发病率也不尽相同,但最常诊断的是距骨联合和方骨联合。本文旨在评估被诊断为跗骨联合的患者的临床和流行病学特征:2007 年 8 月至 2020 年 1 月期间,在西班牙马德里的一家私立大学医院对跗关节联盟患者进行了横断面描述性研究。研究获得并分析了有关年龄、性别、根据解剖位置和组织类型划分的跗骨联合类型、侧位和后足状况以及症状的数据:在已确认的 57 名患者(80 英尺)中,有 31 名男性(54.4%)和 26 名女性(45.6%)。平均年龄为 36.9 岁。联盟总数为 85 个。48例为双侧联合(56.5%)。其中52例为距骨联合(TCC)(61.2%),32例为方骨联合(CNC)(37.6%),1例为方臼联合(1.2%)。我们的系列研究显示有 36 个骨性联盟(42.4%)和 49 个纤维软骨性联盟(57.6%)。单独评估时,35 例 TCC 为骨性(67.3%),17 例为纤维软骨性(32.7%);1 例 CNC 为骨性(3.1%),31 例为纤维软骨性(96.9%):讨论:在我们的研究中,TCC 是最常见的亚型,其中大多数为骨性。从性别分布来看,CCN 组中男性发病率较高(费雪精确检验,P = 0.032)。其中一些结果与之前的文献报道不同,因此需要进行新的研究来解释我国人群中的这种差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
156
审稿时长
51 weeks
期刊介绍: Es una magnífica revista para acceder a los mejores artículos de investigación en la especialidad y los casos clínicos de mayor interés. Además, es la Publicación Oficial de la Sociedad, y está incluida en prestigiosos índices de referencia en medicina.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信