Interprofessional Coproduction of Diagnosis with Medical and Pharmacy Students: An Interactive Case-Based Workshop.

Q3 Medicine
Valerie J Lang, Melanie R Symoniak, Sha-Phawn Williams
{"title":"Interprofessional Coproduction of Diagnosis with Medical and Pharmacy Students: An Interactive Case-Based Workshop.","authors":"Valerie J Lang, Melanie R Symoniak, Sha-Phawn Williams","doi":"10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Institute of Medicine and national competencies emphasize the importance of interprofessional education to reduce diagnostic error. Clinical pharmacists are increasingly integrated into clinical teams and participate in the diagnostic process. However, few educational resources explicitly teach medical and pharmacy students to collaborate on the production of diagnoses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We implemented a 2-hour, online, case-based workshop with 154 second-year medical students and third-year pharmacy students. After brief didactics on the diagnostic process and scope of practice of pharmacists, small groups of eight to 12 medical and pharmacy students with faculty facilitators worked through a case unfolding in two aliquots. Students were provided different but complementary information authentic to their profession. They had to communicate with each other to develop an appropriate differential diagnosis. Students then reflected on how communicating with the other profession impacted their diagnostic reasoning. Comments were coded and counted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority (99%) of students identified their data gathering and differential diagnoses were impacted by working through the case together. More pharmacy students commented on how medical students broadened their differential diagnosis (71%) and added information (72%), contextualizing information, such as past history, medication indications, and physical exam data. More medical students commented on how pharmacy students helped justify (54%) and clarify (22%) the differential diagnosis, often connecting the underlying mechanism of medications with clinical findings.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This interactive case-based workshop was effective in teaching medical and pharmacy students to collaborate in the coproduction of diagnosis. It is feasible with minimal resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":36910,"journal":{"name":"MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources","volume":"20 ","pages":"11437"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11402627/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11437","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The Institute of Medicine and national competencies emphasize the importance of interprofessional education to reduce diagnostic error. Clinical pharmacists are increasingly integrated into clinical teams and participate in the diagnostic process. However, few educational resources explicitly teach medical and pharmacy students to collaborate on the production of diagnoses.

Methods: We implemented a 2-hour, online, case-based workshop with 154 second-year medical students and third-year pharmacy students. After brief didactics on the diagnostic process and scope of practice of pharmacists, small groups of eight to 12 medical and pharmacy students with faculty facilitators worked through a case unfolding in two aliquots. Students were provided different but complementary information authentic to their profession. They had to communicate with each other to develop an appropriate differential diagnosis. Students then reflected on how communicating with the other profession impacted their diagnostic reasoning. Comments were coded and counted.

Results: The majority (99%) of students identified their data gathering and differential diagnoses were impacted by working through the case together. More pharmacy students commented on how medical students broadened their differential diagnosis (71%) and added information (72%), contextualizing information, such as past history, medication indications, and physical exam data. More medical students commented on how pharmacy students helped justify (54%) and clarify (22%) the differential diagnosis, often connecting the underlying mechanism of medications with clinical findings.

Discussion: This interactive case-based workshop was effective in teaching medical and pharmacy students to collaborate in the coproduction of diagnosis. It is feasible with minimal resources.

与医学和药学专业学生共同进行跨专业诊断:基于病例的互动研讨会。
导言:医学研究所和国家能力强调了跨专业教育对减少诊断错误的重要性。临床药剂师越来越多地融入临床团队并参与诊断过程。然而,很少有教育资源明确教导医学生和药剂学学生合作进行诊断:我们为 154 名医学专业二年级学生和药学专业三年级学生举办了一个 2 小时的基于案例的在线研讨会。在对诊断过程和药剂师的执业范围进行简短的说教后,由 8 到 12 名医学生和药剂学学生组成的小组在教师的指导下,分两批完成一个病例。学生们获得了与其专业相关的不同但互补的真实信息。他们必须相互沟通,以做出适当的鉴别诊断。然后,学生们反思与其他专业人员的交流如何影响了他们的诊断推理。对评论进行编码和统计:大多数学生(99%)认为,共同完成病例对他们的数据收集和鉴别诊断产生了影响。更多的药学专业学生评论了医学生如何拓宽了他们的鉴别诊断范围(71%)并增加了信息(72%),将既往史、用药指征和体格检查数据等信息联系起来。更多的医科学生评论了药剂学学生如何帮助证明(54%)和澄清(22%)鉴别诊断,并经常将药物的潜在机制与临床发现联系起来:讨论:这一基于病例的互动式工作坊能有效地教会医学生和药剂学学生合作进行诊断。在资源有限的情况下,该方法是可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
83
审稿时长
35 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信