A Pilot Longitudinal Clinical Reasoning Curriculum for Pediatric Residents.

Q3 Medicine
James Bowen, Catherine Polak, Joanna Thomson, Lisa Herrmann
{"title":"A Pilot Longitudinal Clinical Reasoning Curriculum for Pediatric Residents.","authors":"James Bowen, Catherine Polak, Joanna Thomson, Lisa Herrmann","doi":"10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11447","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Clinical reasoning (CR) is required for physicians. Pediatric residents often gain CR skills through experiential learning. Currently, deliberate education on CR targeted toward pediatric residents is inconsistent. Our objective was to implement a pilot CR curriculum, including five hour-long sessions, and evaluate its impact on self-identified CR Milestones and comfort with CR skills.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used Kern's six steps for curriculum development to develop our curriculum. Five morning report sessions included didactics and small-group activities. Pre/post surveys assessed resident self-identified level on ACGME Milestones related to CR skills (Patient Care 4 [PC4] and Medical Knowledge 2 [MK2]) and comfort with CR skills. The postsurvey assessed resident attitudes toward the sessions. Paired samples for Milestone and comfort-based questions were analyzed using Wilcoxon signed rank tests. Attitude questions were reported with descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Each of the five curricular sessions was attended by 40-50 pediatric residents. Seventy-one trainees (58% of residency) and 51 trainees (42% of residency) completed the pre- and postsurveys, respectively, with 20 paired samples. Self-assessment of PC4 (<i>p</i> = .006) and resident comfort with all measured CR skills increased significantly. Of trainees who attended at least one session (<i>n</i> = 44), most reported finding the sessions helpful (97%), relevant to their clinical work (97%), and impactful on their clinical practice (73%).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Following exposure to this CR curriculum, pediatric residents reported increased self-identified competency levels on the evaluated Milestones and improved comfort with CR skills. Dedicated CR education may advance pediatric resident understanding of and comfort with CR.</p>","PeriodicalId":36910,"journal":{"name":"MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources","volume":"20 ","pages":"11447"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11422513/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11447","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Clinical reasoning (CR) is required for physicians. Pediatric residents often gain CR skills through experiential learning. Currently, deliberate education on CR targeted toward pediatric residents is inconsistent. Our objective was to implement a pilot CR curriculum, including five hour-long sessions, and evaluate its impact on self-identified CR Milestones and comfort with CR skills.

Methods: We used Kern's six steps for curriculum development to develop our curriculum. Five morning report sessions included didactics and small-group activities. Pre/post surveys assessed resident self-identified level on ACGME Milestones related to CR skills (Patient Care 4 [PC4] and Medical Knowledge 2 [MK2]) and comfort with CR skills. The postsurvey assessed resident attitudes toward the sessions. Paired samples for Milestone and comfort-based questions were analyzed using Wilcoxon signed rank tests. Attitude questions were reported with descriptive statistics.

Results: Each of the five curricular sessions was attended by 40-50 pediatric residents. Seventy-one trainees (58% of residency) and 51 trainees (42% of residency) completed the pre- and postsurveys, respectively, with 20 paired samples. Self-assessment of PC4 (p = .006) and resident comfort with all measured CR skills increased significantly. Of trainees who attended at least one session (n = 44), most reported finding the sessions helpful (97%), relevant to their clinical work (97%), and impactful on their clinical practice (73%).

Discussion: Following exposure to this CR curriculum, pediatric residents reported increased self-identified competency levels on the evaluated Milestones and improved comfort with CR skills. Dedicated CR education may advance pediatric resident understanding of and comfort with CR.

儿科住院医师临床推理课程试点。
引言临床推理(CR)是医生的必备技能。儿科住院医师通常通过体验式学习获得临床推理技能。目前,针对儿科住院医师的刻意临床推理教育并不一致。我们的目标是试行临床推理课程,包括五个小时的课程,并评估其对自我认定的临床推理里程碑和临床推理技能舒适度的影响:我们采用 Kern 的课程开发六步骤来开发我们的课程。上午的五节报告课包括说教和小组活动。事前/事后调查评估了住院医师对 ACGME 里程碑中与 CR 技能(患者护理 4 [PC4] 和医学知识 2 [MK2])相关的自我认知水平,以及对 CR 技能的舒适度。后期调查评估住院医师对课程的态度。里程碑和舒适度问题的配对样本采用 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验进行分析。对态度问题进行了描述性统计:五节课程中的每节课都有 40-50 名儿科住院医师参加。71 名学员(占住院医师的 58%)和 51 名学员(占住院医师的 42%)分别完成了事前和事后调查,其中有 20 个配对样本。PC4的自我评估(p = .006)和住院医师对所有测量的CR技能的舒适度均显著提高。在至少参加过一次课程(n = 44)的学员中,大多数人表示课程对他们有帮助(97%),与他们的临床工作相关(97%),对他们的临床实践有影响(73%):讨论:儿科住院医师在学习了这一 CR 课程后,对评估里程碑的自认能力水平有所提高,对 CR 技能也更加得心应手。专门的 CR 教育可提高儿科住院医师对 CR 的理解和掌握。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
83
审稿时长
35 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信