[Pollution Characteristics, Source Analysis, and Ecological Risk Assessment of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in the Third Drain of Ningxia].

Q2 Environmental Science
Hai-Juan Wu, Li Gao, Fu-Juan Li, Ling-Yun Li, Lan-Xiang Zheng
{"title":"[Pollution Characteristics, Source Analysis, and Ecological Risk Assessment of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in the Third Drain of Ningxia].","authors":"Hai-Juan Wu, Li Gao, Fu-Juan Li, Ling-Yun Li, Lan-Xiang Zheng","doi":"10.13227/j.hjkx.202309114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to investigate the contamination characteristics, sources, and ecological risks of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in the Third Drain of Ningxia. Water samples were collected in November 2021, March 2022, and July 2022, respectively. A total of 16 priority PAHs were quantitatively detected using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). The results showed that <i>ρ</i>(∑PAHs) in the drain ranged from 324.11 to 530.77 ng·L<sup>-1</sup>, with an average value of 414.73 ng·L<sup>-1</sup>. The detection rate of each monomer was greater than 90%, and DaA had the highest concentration, with average values of 48.53 ng·L<sup>-1</sup>, followed by IcdP. Compared with those in other rivers in China, the PAH concentrations in the Third Drain of Ningxia showed a medium pollution level. The concentration of ∑PAHs and the high ring monomers were significantly higher in summer than that in spring and winter. On a spatial scale, the average concentration of ∑PAHs in the drain decreased in the order of upstream Helan section &gt; midstream Pingluo section &gt; downstream Huinong section. The proportion of PAHs was in the order of high rings (5-6 rings) &gt; low rings (2-3 rings) &gt; middle rings (4 rings), with 5 rings being dominant. Probabilistic matrix factorization (PMF) was used to quantitatively assess the source apportionment of PAHs. The results showed that coal chemical emissions, automobile exhaust emissions, coal combustion, and petrochemical emissions contributed 27.36%, 27.64%, 26.85%, and 18.15%, respectively. Ecological risk assessment showed that BaA, BbF, BghiP DaA, and IcdP had high risk, whereas other monomers exhibited moderate risk. Therefore, control measures should be taken as soon as possible. This study can provide a scientific basis for the prevention and control of PAH pollution in the drains flowing into the Yellow River of Ningxia..</p>","PeriodicalId":35937,"journal":{"name":"Huanjing Kexue/Environmental Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Huanjing Kexue/Environmental Science","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.202309114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the contamination characteristics, sources, and ecological risks of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in the Third Drain of Ningxia. Water samples were collected in November 2021, March 2022, and July 2022, respectively. A total of 16 priority PAHs were quantitatively detected using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). The results showed that ρ(∑PAHs) in the drain ranged from 324.11 to 530.77 ng·L-1, with an average value of 414.73 ng·L-1. The detection rate of each monomer was greater than 90%, and DaA had the highest concentration, with average values of 48.53 ng·L-1, followed by IcdP. Compared with those in other rivers in China, the PAH concentrations in the Third Drain of Ningxia showed a medium pollution level. The concentration of ∑PAHs and the high ring monomers were significantly higher in summer than that in spring and winter. On a spatial scale, the average concentration of ∑PAHs in the drain decreased in the order of upstream Helan section > midstream Pingluo section > downstream Huinong section. The proportion of PAHs was in the order of high rings (5-6 rings) > low rings (2-3 rings) > middle rings (4 rings), with 5 rings being dominant. Probabilistic matrix factorization (PMF) was used to quantitatively assess the source apportionment of PAHs. The results showed that coal chemical emissions, automobile exhaust emissions, coal combustion, and petrochemical emissions contributed 27.36%, 27.64%, 26.85%, and 18.15%, respectively. Ecological risk assessment showed that BaA, BbF, BghiP DaA, and IcdP had high risk, whereas other monomers exhibited moderate risk. Therefore, control measures should be taken as soon as possible. This study can provide a scientific basis for the prevention and control of PAH pollution in the drains flowing into the Yellow River of Ningxia..

[宁夏第三渠多环芳烃污染特征、来源分析及生态风险评估]。
本研究旨在探讨宁夏第三渠多环芳烃(PAHs)的污染特征、来源及生态风险。的污染特征和生态风险。水样采集时间分别为 2021 年 11 月、2022 年 3 月和 2022 年 7 月。采用气相色谱-质谱法(GC-MS)对16种重点多环芳烃进行了定量检测。结果表明,排水中的ρ(∑PAHs)介于 324.11 至 530.77 ng-L-1 之间,平均值为 414.73 ng-L-1。各单体的检出率均大于 90%,其中 DaA 的浓度最高,平均值为 48.53 ng-L-1,其次是 IcdP。与国内其他河流相比,宁夏第三干渠的多环芳烃浓度处于中等污染水平。夏季∑PAHs和高环单体的浓度明显高于春季和冬季。在空间尺度上,排水中的∑PAHs平均浓度按照上游贺兰段> 中游平罗段> 下游惠农段的顺序下降。多环芳烃所占比例依次为高环(5-6 环)> 低环(2-6 环)>。高环(5-6 环);低环(2-3 环中环(4 环),以 5 环为主。概率矩阵因式分解(PMF)用于定量评估多环芳烃的来源分配。结果表明,煤化工排放、汽车尾气排放、煤炭燃烧和石油化工排放分别占 27.36%、27.64%、26.85% 和 18.15%。生态风险评估显示,BaA、BbF、BghiP DaA 和 IcdP 具有高风险,而其他单体则表现出中等风险。因此,应尽快采取控制措施。本研究可为宁夏黄河入海河道多环芳烃污染的防治提供科学依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Huanjing Kexue/Environmental Science
Huanjing Kexue/Environmental Science Environmental Science-Environmental Science (all)
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15329
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信