Feasibility, Safety and Acceptance of Buccal Mucosa Harvest Under Local Anesthesia for Substitution Urethroplasty:Prospective Observational Study in a Tertiary Centre.

Q4 Medicine
Kathmandu University Medical Journal Pub Date : 2024-04-01
A Pandey, P M Shrestha, A Shrestha, R B Basnet, B Adhikari, A K Shah, U Mishra
{"title":"Feasibility, Safety and Acceptance of Buccal Mucosa Harvest Under Local Anesthesia for Substitution Urethroplasty:Prospective Observational Study in a Tertiary Centre.","authors":"A Pandey, P M Shrestha, A Shrestha, R B Basnet, B Adhikari, A K Shah, U Mishra","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Urethral stricture is a challenging condition with significant socioeconomic impacts, often requiring surgical intervention such as urethroplasty. Buccal mucosa grafts (BMG) are a popular choice for substitution urethroplasty due to their favorable outcomes. This study evaluates the feasibility, safety, and acceptance of harvesting buccal mucosa grafts under local anesthesia. Objective To assess feasibility, safety and acceptance of Buccal mucosa harvest under local anesthesia. Method A prospective observational hospital based study to evaluate outcomes of substitution urethroplasty using buccal mucosa grafts (BMG) under local anesthesia. Result Of the 40 patients, 28 had unilateral graft harvests, while 12 had bilateral procedures. The mean graft length obtained was 5.65 cm. Postoperatively, patients experienced a quick recovery, with full mouth opening achieved within an average of 2.78 days and resumption of normal eating within 2.6 days. Minor complications included oral swelling in 15% of cases and food residue in 12.5%. Although 87.5% of patients reported pain at the perineal wound site, the overall pain score averaged 3.58, indicating manageable discomfort. Importantly, 92.5% of patients expressed a willingness to undergo the procedure again if necessary. Conclusion These findings suggest that buccal mucosa graft harvest under local anesthesia is both feasible and well-tolerated. The procedure appears to be a safe alternative to regional or general anesthesia, with minimal complications and a high level of patient acceptance. Future randomized controlled trials comparing local anesthesia to regional or general anesthesia could provide additional insights and further validate these findings. This study contributes to the growing body of evidence supporting the use of local anesthesia in urethral stricture surgery, offering a practical approach to managing this condition effectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":35493,"journal":{"name":"Kathmandu University Medical Journal","volume":"22 86","pages":"197-201"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kathmandu University Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Urethral stricture is a challenging condition with significant socioeconomic impacts, often requiring surgical intervention such as urethroplasty. Buccal mucosa grafts (BMG) are a popular choice for substitution urethroplasty due to their favorable outcomes. This study evaluates the feasibility, safety, and acceptance of harvesting buccal mucosa grafts under local anesthesia. Objective To assess feasibility, safety and acceptance of Buccal mucosa harvest under local anesthesia. Method A prospective observational hospital based study to evaluate outcomes of substitution urethroplasty using buccal mucosa grafts (BMG) under local anesthesia. Result Of the 40 patients, 28 had unilateral graft harvests, while 12 had bilateral procedures. The mean graft length obtained was 5.65 cm. Postoperatively, patients experienced a quick recovery, with full mouth opening achieved within an average of 2.78 days and resumption of normal eating within 2.6 days. Minor complications included oral swelling in 15% of cases and food residue in 12.5%. Although 87.5% of patients reported pain at the perineal wound site, the overall pain score averaged 3.58, indicating manageable discomfort. Importantly, 92.5% of patients expressed a willingness to undergo the procedure again if necessary. Conclusion These findings suggest that buccal mucosa graft harvest under local anesthesia is both feasible and well-tolerated. The procedure appears to be a safe alternative to regional or general anesthesia, with minimal complications and a high level of patient acceptance. Future randomized controlled trials comparing local anesthesia to regional or general anesthesia could provide additional insights and further validate these findings. This study contributes to the growing body of evidence supporting the use of local anesthesia in urethral stricture surgery, offering a practical approach to managing this condition effectively.

在局部麻醉下采集颊黏膜用于替代尿道成形术的可行性、安全性和接受度:一家三级医疗中心的前瞻性观察研究。
背景尿道狭窄是一种具有挑战性的疾病,对社会经济有重大影响,通常需要进行手术干预,如尿道成形术。颊粘膜移植(BMG)因其良好的效果而成为替代尿道成形术的热门选择。本研究评估了在局部麻醉下采集颊粘膜移植物的可行性、安全性和接受度。目的 评估在局部麻醉下采集颊粘膜的可行性、安全性和接受程度。方法 在医院进行前瞻性观察研究,评估在局部麻醉下使用颊粘膜移植物(BMG)进行替代尿道成形术的效果。结果 在 40 名患者中,28 人进行了单侧移植物采集,12 人进行了双侧手术。移植物的平均长度为 5.65 厘米。术后患者恢复很快,平均 2.78 天就能完全张开嘴巴,2.6 天就能恢复正常进食。轻微并发症包括 15% 的病例出现口腔肿胀,12.5% 的病例出现食物残渣。虽然 87.5% 的患者报告会阴伤口处疼痛,但总体疼痛评分平均为 3.58 分,表明不适感可控。重要的是,92.5% 的患者表示如有必要,愿意再次接受该手术。结论 这些研究结果表明,在局部麻醉下进行颊粘膜移植是可行的,而且患者的耐受性良好。该手术似乎是区域或全身麻醉的安全替代方案,并发症极少,患者接受度高。将局部麻醉与区域或全身麻醉进行比较的未来随机对照试验可提供更多见解,并进一步验证这些研究结果。这项研究为越来越多支持在尿道狭窄手术中使用局部麻醉的证据做出了贡献,为有效治疗这种疾病提供了一种实用的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Kathmandu University Medical Journal
Kathmandu University Medical Journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信