Productivity and nitrogen metabolism of lactating cows fed pistachio hull with soybean meal partially replaced by slow-release urea.

IF 1.7 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
M Sadeghi, E Ghasemi, R Sadeghi, F Hashemzadeh, A Kahyani, S Kalantari, F Ahmadi
{"title":"Productivity and nitrogen metabolism of lactating cows fed pistachio hull with soybean meal partially replaced by slow-release urea.","authors":"M Sadeghi, E Ghasemi, R Sadeghi, F Hashemzadeh, A Kahyani, S Kalantari, F Ahmadi","doi":"10.1007/s11250-024-04123-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pistachio hull (PH), a rich source of tannin, may interact with nitrogen (N) and affect N metabolism in dairy cows. This investigation aimed to assess the effects of feeding PH and two N sources (soybean meal: SBM or slow-release urea: SRU) on milk production, digestibility, and N metabolism in lactating dairy cows. The study utilized a 4 × 4 Latin square design with 12 Holstein dairy cows (body weight = 611 ± 39 kg; 84 ± 14 days in milk; 45.6 ± 5.3 kg/d milk), with treatments arranged in a 2 × 2 factorial configuration. The main factors were (1) the tannin source [without or with dried PH included at 76.5 g/kg of diet DM] and (2) two N sources [SBM vs. SRU]. Crude protein and total phenolic and tannin contents were greater, but NDF was lower in PH than in sugar beet pulp. Feeding diets containing 7.65% PH resulted in reductions in milk yield, milk urea N, and milk efficiency but milk fat and protein concentration increased. Milk yield was similar between SBM and SRU. Feeding PH in replacement to sugar beet pulp did not interact with N sources, except for feed intake, as the PH + SRU diet tended to decrease feed intake (P = 0.09). Feeding PH was also associated with decreased dry matter, crude protein, and NDF digestibility. Dry matter digestibility decreased when a portion of SBM was replaced by SRU. Feeding PH in replacement to sugar beet pulp lowered ruminal ammonia-N concentration and increased acetate-to-propionate proportion. Feeding PH vs. sugar beet pulp had no effect on N intake and N excretion in urine and milk, but it increased the amount of N excretion in feces and decreased apparent N efficiency (milk N/N intake). Alanine aminotransferase was lower in cows fed SRU only in PH- but not sugar beet pulp-containing diets. Blood creatinine was lower when SRU was included in the PH-containing diet, but the opposite was observed in diets containing sugar beet pulp. Feeding PH instead of sugar beet pulp did not affect blood urea-N but resulted in lower glucose and aspartate aminotransferase concentrations. Overall, cows fed PH in replacement to sugar beet pulp were less efficient in converting feed nutrients into milk production, likely because of its negative effect on nutrient digestion. Partial replacement of SBM with SRU had no influence on lactation productivity and urea-N concentration in milk and blood. This may imply the suitability of SRU in providing a sustained supply of N in the rumen, likely qualifying it as a viable source of N to replace a portion of SBM in dairy diets.</p>","PeriodicalId":23329,"journal":{"name":"Tropical animal health and production","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tropical animal health and production","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-024-04123-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pistachio hull (PH), a rich source of tannin, may interact with nitrogen (N) and affect N metabolism in dairy cows. This investigation aimed to assess the effects of feeding PH and two N sources (soybean meal: SBM or slow-release urea: SRU) on milk production, digestibility, and N metabolism in lactating dairy cows. The study utilized a 4 × 4 Latin square design with 12 Holstein dairy cows (body weight = 611 ± 39 kg; 84 ± 14 days in milk; 45.6 ± 5.3 kg/d milk), with treatments arranged in a 2 × 2 factorial configuration. The main factors were (1) the tannin source [without or with dried PH included at 76.5 g/kg of diet DM] and (2) two N sources [SBM vs. SRU]. Crude protein and total phenolic and tannin contents were greater, but NDF was lower in PH than in sugar beet pulp. Feeding diets containing 7.65% PH resulted in reductions in milk yield, milk urea N, and milk efficiency but milk fat and protein concentration increased. Milk yield was similar between SBM and SRU. Feeding PH in replacement to sugar beet pulp did not interact with N sources, except for feed intake, as the PH + SRU diet tended to decrease feed intake (P = 0.09). Feeding PH was also associated with decreased dry matter, crude protein, and NDF digestibility. Dry matter digestibility decreased when a portion of SBM was replaced by SRU. Feeding PH in replacement to sugar beet pulp lowered ruminal ammonia-N concentration and increased acetate-to-propionate proportion. Feeding PH vs. sugar beet pulp had no effect on N intake and N excretion in urine and milk, but it increased the amount of N excretion in feces and decreased apparent N efficiency (milk N/N intake). Alanine aminotransferase was lower in cows fed SRU only in PH- but not sugar beet pulp-containing diets. Blood creatinine was lower when SRU was included in the PH-containing diet, but the opposite was observed in diets containing sugar beet pulp. Feeding PH instead of sugar beet pulp did not affect blood urea-N but resulted in lower glucose and aspartate aminotransferase concentrations. Overall, cows fed PH in replacement to sugar beet pulp were less efficient in converting feed nutrients into milk production, likely because of its negative effect on nutrient digestion. Partial replacement of SBM with SRU had no influence on lactation productivity and urea-N concentration in milk and blood. This may imply the suitability of SRU in providing a sustained supply of N in the rumen, likely qualifying it as a viable source of N to replace a portion of SBM in dairy diets.

用缓释尿素部分替代开心果壳和豆粕喂养泌乳奶牛的生产率和氮代谢。
开心果壳(PH)是一种丰富的单宁来源,可能与氮(N)发生相互作用,影响奶牛的氮代谢。本研究旨在评估饲喂 PH 和两种氮源(豆粕:SBM 或缓释尿素:SRU)对泌乳奶牛产奶量、消化率和氮代谢的影响。该研究采用 4 × 4 拉丁正方形设计,12 头荷斯坦奶牛(体重 = 611 ± 39 千克;产奶天数 84 ± 14 天;产奶量 45.6 ± 5.3 千克/天)的处理采用 2 × 2 的因子配置。主要因素有:(1) 单宁源[不含或含干 PH(76.5 克/千克日粮 DM)];(2) 两种氮源[SBM 与 SRU]。与甜菜浆相比,PH 的粗蛋白、总酚和单宁含量更高,但 NDF 更低。饲喂 PH 含量为 7.65% 的日粮导致牛奶产量、牛奶尿素氮和牛奶效率降低,但牛奶脂肪和蛋白质浓度增加。SBM和SRU的产奶量相似。饲喂 PH 代替甜菜浆与氮源没有相互作用,但采食量除外,因为 PH + SRU 日粮有减少采食量的趋势(P = 0.09)。饲喂 PH 也与干物质、粗蛋白和 NDF 消化率下降有关。当一部分 SBM 被 SRU 替代时,干物质消化率下降。饲喂 PH 代替甜菜浆可降低瘤胃氨-N 浓度并增加乙酸盐-丙酸盐比例。饲喂 PH 与饲喂甜菜浆对氮的摄入量以及氮在尿液和牛奶中的排泄量没有影响,但它增加了氮在粪便中的排泄量,并降低了表观氮效率(牛奶的氮/摄入量)。仅在含 PH 的日粮中饲喂 SRU 的奶牛丙氨酸氨基转移酶较低,而在含甜菜浆的日粮中饲喂 SRU 的奶牛丙氨酸氨基转移酶较低。在含 PH 的日粮中添加 SRU 时,血肌酐较低,但在含甜菜浆的日粮中则相反。饲喂 PH 而不是甜菜浆不会影响血液中的尿素氮,但会导致葡萄糖和天冬氨酸氨基转移酶浓度降低。总的来说,用 PH 代替甜菜浆饲喂的奶牛将饲料养分转化为产奶量的效率较低,这可能是因为 PH 对养分消化有负面影响。用 SRU 部分替代 SBM 对泌乳生产率以及牛奶和血液中的尿素氮浓度没有影响。这可能意味着 SRU 适合在瘤胃中持续供应氮,因此有可能成为奶牛日粮中替代部分 SBM 的可行氮源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tropical animal health and production
Tropical animal health and production 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
11.80%
发文量
361
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Tropical Animal Health and Production is an international journal publishing the results of original research in any field of animal health, welfare, and production with the aim of improving health and productivity of livestock, and better utilisation of animal resources, including wildlife in tropical, subtropical and similar agro-ecological environments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信