Estimation of breed effects and non-additive genetic variation for ostrich slaughter and skin traits.

IF 1.7 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Khetho Ratshilumela Nemutandani, Anel Engelbrecht, Schalk Willem Petrus Cloete, Kennedy Dzama, Obert Tada
{"title":"Estimation of breed effects and non-additive genetic variation for ostrich slaughter and skin traits.","authors":"Khetho Ratshilumela Nemutandani, Anel Engelbrecht, Schalk Willem Petrus Cloete, Kennedy Dzama, Obert Tada","doi":"10.1007/s11250-024-04168-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The study quantified breed effects and putative non-additive genetic variation for quantitative and qualitative slaughter and skin traits involving three ostrich breeds: South African Black (SAB), Zimbabwean Blue (ZB), and Kenyan Red (KR) ostriches. Such data from contemporary slaughter groups with all three pure breeds represented were analyzed together (SAB: n = 457; ZB: n = 74; KR: n = 50). Two 2 × 2 diallel crossbreeding designs were used to assess crosses of ZB and KR birds with the SAB strain. Subsequently, the data from SAB, ZB and their reciprocal crosses, slaughtered together; as well as the data from SAB and KR ostriches, along with their reciprocal crosses, respectively, were analyzed separately. ZB and KR birds outperformed SAB birds for most size-related slaughter and skin traits. Linear contrasts were used to distinguish the effects of breed, heterosis, and the dam line. For the ZB x SAB design, additive breed effects were significant for slaughter weight (10.4%), crust skin size (3.9%) and nodule shape score (1.6%) (all P < 0.05). Significant heterosis were found for slaughter weight (4.3%), crust skin size (1.7%) and nodule size score (3.7%) (P < 0.05). Dam line effects were observed for skin weight (4.1%) and hair follicle score (4.1%). In the KR x SAB design, additive breed effects were like outcomes for the ZB x SAB design. Heterosis estimates were significant (P < 0.05) for slaughter weight (5.8%), crust skin size (2.9%), crown length (1.7%) and nodule size score (4.4%). Dam line effects were significant for slaughter weight (3.7%) and nodule size score (3.8%). In conclusion, ZB and KR birds outperformed their SAB contemporaries for size and size-related traits. Crossbreeding with these genotypes could improve some size-related traits over the mid-parent value of purebreds.</p>","PeriodicalId":23329,"journal":{"name":"Tropical animal health and production","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11442555/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tropical animal health and production","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-024-04168-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study quantified breed effects and putative non-additive genetic variation for quantitative and qualitative slaughter and skin traits involving three ostrich breeds: South African Black (SAB), Zimbabwean Blue (ZB), and Kenyan Red (KR) ostriches. Such data from contemporary slaughter groups with all three pure breeds represented were analyzed together (SAB: n = 457; ZB: n = 74; KR: n = 50). Two 2 × 2 diallel crossbreeding designs were used to assess crosses of ZB and KR birds with the SAB strain. Subsequently, the data from SAB, ZB and their reciprocal crosses, slaughtered together; as well as the data from SAB and KR ostriches, along with their reciprocal crosses, respectively, were analyzed separately. ZB and KR birds outperformed SAB birds for most size-related slaughter and skin traits. Linear contrasts were used to distinguish the effects of breed, heterosis, and the dam line. For the ZB x SAB design, additive breed effects were significant for slaughter weight (10.4%), crust skin size (3.9%) and nodule shape score (1.6%) (all P < 0.05). Significant heterosis were found for slaughter weight (4.3%), crust skin size (1.7%) and nodule size score (3.7%) (P < 0.05). Dam line effects were observed for skin weight (4.1%) and hair follicle score (4.1%). In the KR x SAB design, additive breed effects were like outcomes for the ZB x SAB design. Heterosis estimates were significant (P < 0.05) for slaughter weight (5.8%), crust skin size (2.9%), crown length (1.7%) and nodule size score (4.4%). Dam line effects were significant for slaughter weight (3.7%) and nodule size score (3.8%). In conclusion, ZB and KR birds outperformed their SAB contemporaries for size and size-related traits. Crossbreeding with these genotypes could improve some size-related traits over the mid-parent value of purebreds.

鸵鸟屠宰和皮肤特征的品种效应和非加性遗传变异的估计。
该研究量化了三个鸵鸟品种在定量和定性屠宰及皮肤特征方面的品种效应和推定非加性遗传变异:南非黑鸵鸟(SAB)、津巴布韦蓝鸵鸟(ZB)和肯尼亚红鸵鸟(KR)。这些数据来自当代的屠宰组,所有三个纯种鸵鸟都有代表(南非黑鸵鸟:n = 457;津巴布韦蓝鸵鸟:n = 74;肯尼亚红鸵鸟:n = 50)。采用了两个 2 × 2 双数杂交设计来评估 ZB 和 KR 禽与 SAB 品系的杂交情况。随后,分别分析了一起屠宰的 SAB、ZB 及其互交品系的数据,以及 SAB 和 KR 鸵鸟及其互交品系的数据。在大多数与体型相关的屠宰和皮肤特征方面,ZB和KR鸵鸟的表现优于SAB鸵鸟。线性对比用于区分品种、异交和母系的影响。在 ZB x SAB 设计中,屠宰重(10.4%)、表皮尺寸(3.9%)和结节形状评分(1.6%)的品种加性效应显著(均为 P/P)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tropical animal health and production
Tropical animal health and production 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
11.80%
发文量
361
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Tropical Animal Health and Production is an international journal publishing the results of original research in any field of animal health, welfare, and production with the aim of improving health and productivity of livestock, and better utilisation of animal resources, including wildlife in tropical, subtropical and similar agro-ecological environments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信