Childhood Separation Anxiety Disorder and Panic Disorder: Differences Between Respiratory and Nonrespiratory Subtypes.

Q4 Medicine
Mariana Costa Cabo, Julio Cezar Albuquerque Costa, Antonio Egidio Nardi, Rafael C Freire
{"title":"Childhood Separation Anxiety Disorder and Panic Disorder: Differences Between Respiratory and Nonrespiratory Subtypes.","authors":"Mariana Costa Cabo, Julio Cezar Albuquerque Costa, Antonio Egidio Nardi, Rafael C Freire","doi":"10.4088/PCC.24m03709","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> The association between childhood separation anxiety disorder (CSAD) and panic disorder (PD) has been demonstrated, although some findings are contradictory. The separation anxiety hypothesis postulates that both CSAD and PD encompass a heightened sensitivity to carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>). Patients with the respiratory subtype (RS) of PD are known to be more sensitive to CO<sub>2 </sub>than those from the nonrespiratory subtype (NRS). Therefore, the primary objective centered on the comparative analysis of CSAD prevalence between RS and NRS groups, with secondary objectives focusing on the comparative assessment of RS and NRS groups and the control group.</p><p><p><b>Methods:</b> Sixty RS-PD patients, 60 NRS-PD patients, and 60 controls were assessed for retrospective diagnosis of CSAD between March 2020 and August 2023 using a diagnostic categorical instrument, <i>DSM-5</i> criteria, and a dimensional one, the Separation Anxiety Symptom Inventory.</p><p><p><b>Results:</b> RS patients had a significantly greater history of CSAD (55%) compared to the NRS (23%) and control (17%) groups (<i>P</i> < .001), which shows stronger association with the RS group. As seen in logistic regression, RS patients had 3.02 more chances of having CSAD when compared the NRS group and 5.11 when compared to the control group, which shows stronger association with the RS group.</p><p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> This study supports the hypothesis that RS-PD is associated with CSAD, while there is a weak association between NRS-PD and CSAD. It is advisable for clinicians to screen individuals with RS-PD for symptoms of separation anxiety, as these symptoms may have a negative impact on the prognosis of PD.</p><p><p><i>Prim Care Companion CNS Disord 2024;26(5):24m03709</i>.</p><p><p>\n <i>Author affiliations are listed at the end of this article.</i>\n </p>","PeriodicalId":22814,"journal":{"name":"The primary care companion for CNS disorders","volume":"26 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The primary care companion for CNS disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4088/PCC.24m03709","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The association between childhood separation anxiety disorder (CSAD) and panic disorder (PD) has been demonstrated, although some findings are contradictory. The separation anxiety hypothesis postulates that both CSAD and PD encompass a heightened sensitivity to carbon dioxide (CO2). Patients with the respiratory subtype (RS) of PD are known to be more sensitive to CO2 than those from the nonrespiratory subtype (NRS). Therefore, the primary objective centered on the comparative analysis of CSAD prevalence between RS and NRS groups, with secondary objectives focusing on the comparative assessment of RS and NRS groups and the control group.

Methods: Sixty RS-PD patients, 60 NRS-PD patients, and 60 controls were assessed for retrospective diagnosis of CSAD between March 2020 and August 2023 using a diagnostic categorical instrument, DSM-5 criteria, and a dimensional one, the Separation Anxiety Symptom Inventory.

Results: RS patients had a significantly greater history of CSAD (55%) compared to the NRS (23%) and control (17%) groups (P < .001), which shows stronger association with the RS group. As seen in logistic regression, RS patients had 3.02 more chances of having CSAD when compared the NRS group and 5.11 when compared to the control group, which shows stronger association with the RS group.

Conclusion: This study supports the hypothesis that RS-PD is associated with CSAD, while there is a weak association between NRS-PD and CSAD. It is advisable for clinicians to screen individuals with RS-PD for symptoms of separation anxiety, as these symptoms may have a negative impact on the prognosis of PD.

Prim Care Companion CNS Disord 2024;26(5):24m03709.

Author affiliations are listed at the end of this article.

儿童分离焦虑症和恐慌症:呼吸亚型与非呼吸亚型之间的差异。
目的:童年分离焦虑症(CSAD)与惊恐障碍(PD)之间的关联已得到证实,但有些研究结果却相互矛盾。分离焦虑假说认为,儿童分离焦虑症和惊恐障碍都对二氧化碳(CO2)高度敏感。众所周知,呼吸亚型(RS)的帕金森氏症患者比非呼吸亚型(NRS)的患者对二氧化碳更敏感。因此,首要目标是比较分析 RS 组和 NRS 组的 CSAD 患病率,次要目标是对 RS 组和 NRS 组以及对照组进行比较评估:在 2020 年 3 月至 2023 年 8 月期间,使用分类诊断工具 DSM-5 标准和维度诊断工具分离焦虑症状量表,对 60 名 RS-PD 患者、60 名 NRS-PD 患者和 60 名对照组进行了 CSAD 回顾性诊断评估:与NRS组(23%)和对照组(17%)相比,RS组患者的CSAD病史(55%)明显增多(P < .001),这表明与RS组的关联性更强。从逻辑回归中可以看出,与 NRS 组相比,RS 患者患 CSAD 的几率增加了 3.02 倍,与对照组相比增加了 5.11 倍,这表明 RS 组与 CSAD 的关联性更强:本研究支持 RS-PD 与 CSAD 相关,而 NRS-PD 与 CSAD 相关性较弱的假设。临床医生最好对 RS-PD 患者进行分离焦虑症状筛查,因为这些症状可能会对 PD 的预后产生负面影响。 作者单位列于本文末尾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
300
期刊介绍: Founded in 1998, The Primary Care Companion for CNS Disorders (ISSN 2155-7780), formerly The Primary Care Companion to The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, is an international, peer-reviewed, online-only journal, and its articles are indexed by the National Library of Medicine. PCC seeks to advance the clinical expertise of primary care physicians and other health care professionals who treat patients with mental and neurologic illnesses. PCC publishes research from disciplines such as medicine, nursing, pharmacy, and psychology, especially as it pertains to integrated delivery systems and interdisciplinary collaboration. PCC focuses on providing information of direct clinical utility and giving a voice to clinician researchers. Practice-based research from individuals and groups with clinical expertise is particularly welcome. Pertinent manuscript types include: -Original research -Systematic reviews -Meta-analyses -Case reports and series -Commenting letters to the editor Articles published in PCC typically cover attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, depression, bipolar disorder, anxiety, addiction, sleep disorders, pain, Alzheimer’s disease, multiple sclerosis, and Parkinson’s disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信