Visual field testing in glaucoma using the Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm (SITA).

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Jeremy C K Tan, Jithin Yohannan, Pradeep Y Ramulu, Michael Kalloniatis, David P Crabb, Jonathan Crowston, Jack Phu
{"title":"Visual field testing in glaucoma using the Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm (SITA).","authors":"Jeremy C K Tan, Jithin Yohannan, Pradeep Y Ramulu, Michael Kalloniatis, David P Crabb, Jonathan Crowston, Jack Phu","doi":"10.1016/j.survophthal.2024.09.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm (SITA) is the main measurement acquisition algorithm used on the Humphrey Field Analyser, the most commonly used instrument for visual field (VF) assessment worldwide. We compare the sensitivity outputs and reliability parameters of the three currently available SITA algorithms-SITA Standard (SS), Fast (SF), and Faster (SFR), with a focus on the newly released SFR and the 24-2C test grid. SFR displays similar sensitivity outputs to SS and SF, but may not be interchangeable with SS in eyes with more severe VF loss. The reliability metric with the greatest impact on VF reliability is the level of false positives, although the recommended 15 % false positive cut off may be inappropriate as a threshold for judging whether a test is reliable and should be included for use in SFR. Finally, the 24-2C grid may be useful in flagging the presence of a clustered central VF defect, while the 10-2 grid can be used to more comprehensively characterize central field defects. We also discuss strategies to improve testing frequency in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":22102,"journal":{"name":"Survey of ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Survey of ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2024.09.005","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm (SITA) is the main measurement acquisition algorithm used on the Humphrey Field Analyser, the most commonly used instrument for visual field (VF) assessment worldwide. We compare the sensitivity outputs and reliability parameters of the three currently available SITA algorithms-SITA Standard (SS), Fast (SF), and Faster (SFR), with a focus on the newly released SFR and the 24-2C test grid. SFR displays similar sensitivity outputs to SS and SF, but may not be interchangeable with SS in eyes with more severe VF loss. The reliability metric with the greatest impact on VF reliability is the level of false positives, although the recommended 15 % false positive cut off may be inappropriate as a threshold for judging whether a test is reliable and should be included for use in SFR. Finally, the 24-2C grid may be useful in flagging the presence of a clustered central VF defect, while the 10-2 grid can be used to more comprehensively characterize central field defects. We also discuss strategies to improve testing frequency in clinical practice.

使用瑞典交互式阈值算法进行青光眼视野测试。
瑞典交互式阈值算法(SITA)是汉弗莱视野分析仪(Humphrey Field Analyser)上使用的主要测量采集算法,汉弗莱视野分析仪是全球最常用的视野(VF)评估仪器。我们比较了目前可用的三种 SITA 算法--SITA 标准(SS)、快速(SF)和更快(SFR)的灵敏度输出和可靠性参数,重点是新发布的 SFR 和 24-2C 测试网格。SFR 显示出与 SS 和 SF 相似的灵敏度输出,但在视力损失更严重的眼睛中可能无法与 SS 互换。对 VF 可靠性影响最大的可靠性指标是假阳性水平,尽管推荐的 15%假阳性临界值可能不适合作为判断测试是否可靠的阈值,而应纳入 SFR 中使用。最后,24-2C 网格可用于标记中心 VF 缺陷集群的存在,而 10-2 网格可用于更全面地描述中心场缺陷的特征。我们还讨论了在临床实践中提高检测频率的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Survey of ophthalmology
Survey of ophthalmology 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
2.00%
发文量
138
审稿时长
14.8 weeks
期刊介绍: Survey of Ophthalmology is a clinically oriented review journal designed to keep ophthalmologists up to date. Comprehensive major review articles, written by experts and stringently refereed, integrate the literature on subjects selected for their clinical importance. Survey also includes feature articles, section reviews, book reviews, and abstracts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信