Use of cannabis for mental health in the Canadian territories: a cross-sectional study.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Naomi Schwartz, Theresa Poon, David Hammond, Erin Hobin
{"title":"Use of cannabis for mental health in the Canadian territories: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Naomi Schwartz, Theresa Poon, David Hammond, Erin Hobin","doi":"10.1080/10826084.2024.2409711","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Population prevalence and patterns of cannabis use for mental health (CUMH) are underexplored. This is important to understand in the Canadian territories which has the highest prevalence of cannabis use in Canada. This study aimed to examine socio-demographic factors associated with CUMH in the territories and associations between CUMH and cannabis use outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study is a cross-sectional analysis of survey data from the 2022 Cannabis Policy Study in the Territories, including 2431 respondents aged 16+. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine socio-demographic characteristics associated with CUMH. Among past 12-month cannabis consumers, multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine whether CUMH was associated with daily/near-daily use, cannabis product type, healthcare interactions, and self-reported impacts on mental health, controlling for socio-demographic characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 29.6% of all participants, and 55.5% of past 12-month cannabis consumers reported ever using cannabis for mental health. Use for mental health was higher among those with lower education, lower perceived income adequacy, and younger ages. Those reporting CUMH were more likely to report daily/near-daily use (OR<sub>adj</sub> = 3.00, 95%CI: 2.01-4.49), potent product types like solid concentrates (OR<sub>adj</sub> = 2.76, 1.62-4.70), and perceived positive impacts on mental health (OR<sub>adj</sub> = 3.71, 2.49-5.52).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Due to the high prevalence of CUMH, more research is needed to examine its long-term impacts and effectiveness. Future research is also needed to understand the social context underlying socioeconomic inequalities in CUMH, including access to mental healthcare and harm reduction measures for mitigating adverse mental health impacts.</p>","PeriodicalId":22088,"journal":{"name":"Substance Use & Misuse","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance Use & Misuse","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2024.2409711","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Population prevalence and patterns of cannabis use for mental health (CUMH) are underexplored. This is important to understand in the Canadian territories which has the highest prevalence of cannabis use in Canada. This study aimed to examine socio-demographic factors associated with CUMH in the territories and associations between CUMH and cannabis use outcomes.

Methods: This study is a cross-sectional analysis of survey data from the 2022 Cannabis Policy Study in the Territories, including 2431 respondents aged 16+. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine socio-demographic characteristics associated with CUMH. Among past 12-month cannabis consumers, multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine whether CUMH was associated with daily/near-daily use, cannabis product type, healthcare interactions, and self-reported impacts on mental health, controlling for socio-demographic characteristics.

Results: Overall, 29.6% of all participants, and 55.5% of past 12-month cannabis consumers reported ever using cannabis for mental health. Use for mental health was higher among those with lower education, lower perceived income adequacy, and younger ages. Those reporting CUMH were more likely to report daily/near-daily use (ORadj = 3.00, 95%CI: 2.01-4.49), potent product types like solid concentrates (ORadj = 2.76, 1.62-4.70), and perceived positive impacts on mental health (ORadj = 3.71, 2.49-5.52).

Conclusion: Due to the high prevalence of CUMH, more research is needed to examine its long-term impacts and effectiveness. Future research is also needed to understand the social context underlying socioeconomic inequalities in CUMH, including access to mental healthcare and harm reduction measures for mitigating adverse mental health impacts.

加拿大各地区使用大麻促进精神健康的情况:横断面研究。
背景:对因精神健康而使用大麻(CUMH)的人群流行率和模式的研究还很不够。对于加拿大大麻使用率最高的地区来说,了解这一点非常重要。本研究旨在考察与各地区 CUMH 相关的社会人口因素,以及 CUMH 与大麻使用结果之间的关联:本研究对 2022 年各地区大麻政策研究的调查数据进行了横截面分析,其中包括 2431 名 16 岁以上的受访者。采用多变量逻辑回归模型研究与 CUMH 相关的社会人口特征。在过去 12 个月的大麻消费者中,使用多变量逻辑回归模型来研究 CUMH 是否与每日/近每日使用、大麻产品类型、医疗保健互动以及自我报告的对心理健康的影响有关,同时控制社会人口特征:总体而言,29.6%的参与者和 55.5%的过去 12 个月大麻消费者报告曾为精神健康使用大麻。在教育程度较低、收入充足感较低和年龄较小的人群中,为精神健康使用大麻的比例较高。那些报告为精神健康而使用大麻的人更有可能报告每天/近乎每天使用(ORadj = 3.00,95%CI:2.01-4.49)、烈性产品类型(如固体浓缩物)(ORadj = 2.76,1.62-4.70)以及认为对精神健康有积极影响(ORadj = 3.71,2.49-5.52):由于 CUMH 的发病率较高,因此需要开展更多的研究来探讨其长期影响和有效性。未来的研究还需要了解导致 CUMH 社会经济不平等的社会背景,包括获得心理保健的机会和减轻对心理健康不利影响的减害措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Substance Use & Misuse
Substance Use & Misuse 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
200
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: For over 50 years, Substance Use & Misuse (formerly The International Journal of the Addictions) has provided a unique international multidisciplinary venue for the exchange of original research, theories, policy analyses, and unresolved issues concerning substance use and misuse (licit and illicit drugs, alcohol, nicotine, and eating disorders). Guest editors for special issues devoted to single topics of current concern are invited. Topics covered include: Clinical trials and clinical research (treatment and prevention of substance misuse and related infectious diseases) Epidemiology of substance misuse and related infectious diseases Social pharmacology Meta-analyses and systematic reviews Translation of scientific findings to real world clinical and other settings Adolescent and student-focused research State of the art quantitative and qualitative research Policy analyses Negative results and intervention failures that are instructive Validity studies of instruments, scales, and tests that are generalizable Critiques and essays on unresolved issues Authors can choose to publish gold open access in this journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信