Experiences and perceptions of patients with cancer receiving home-based chemotherapy: a qualitative systematic review protocol.

IF 6.3 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Porawan Witwaranukool, Ratchanok Phonyiam, Yanni Wu, Kathryn Kynoch
{"title":"Experiences and perceptions of patients with cancer receiving home-based chemotherapy: a qualitative systematic review protocol.","authors":"Porawan Witwaranukool, Ratchanok Phonyiam, Yanni Wu, Kathryn Kynoch","doi":"10.1186/s13643-024-02659-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Home-based chemotherapy (HBC) has emerged as a standard option for treating various types of cancer, primarily to decrease the waiting time for treatment. As HBC gains more recognition, ongoing research is delving into the experiences of patients with cancer who receive chemotherapy in a home setting or chemotherapy closer to home. Understanding these experiences is vital for the use of chemotherapy delivery outside the traditional hospital environments. This review aims to synthesize and critically appraise qualitative studies that investigate the experience and perspectives of patients with cancer who received parenteral chemotherapy administration in home settings. Findings will be used to develop evidence-based policies to support home-based care models.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review will follow JBI methods for systematic reviews of qualitative evidence. The databases for searching will include MEDLINE (PubMed), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), PsycINFO (EBSCOhost), ProQuest Health and Medical Collection, two Chinese databases, CNKI and Wanfang, and one Thai database, ThaiJO. Studies published in English, Chinese, and Thai will be considered for inclusion. Two reviewers will independently undertake study selection, data extraction, and critical appraisal of the methodological quality of studies. The synthesized findings will be assessed using the ConQual approach.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The synthesis of qualitative studies on this topic will provide insights into the nuanced and varied experiences of patients receiving chemotherapy within the comfort of their homes. The review will also provide evidence-based recommendations to policymakers and healthcare administrators, to support the implementation of HBC for patients.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42024500476.</p>","PeriodicalId":22162,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Reviews","volume":"13 1","pages":"242"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11438387/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-024-02659-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Home-based chemotherapy (HBC) has emerged as a standard option for treating various types of cancer, primarily to decrease the waiting time for treatment. As HBC gains more recognition, ongoing research is delving into the experiences of patients with cancer who receive chemotherapy in a home setting or chemotherapy closer to home. Understanding these experiences is vital for the use of chemotherapy delivery outside the traditional hospital environments. This review aims to synthesize and critically appraise qualitative studies that investigate the experience and perspectives of patients with cancer who received parenteral chemotherapy administration in home settings. Findings will be used to develop evidence-based policies to support home-based care models.

Methods: This review will follow JBI methods for systematic reviews of qualitative evidence. The databases for searching will include MEDLINE (PubMed), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), PsycINFO (EBSCOhost), ProQuest Health and Medical Collection, two Chinese databases, CNKI and Wanfang, and one Thai database, ThaiJO. Studies published in English, Chinese, and Thai will be considered for inclusion. Two reviewers will independently undertake study selection, data extraction, and critical appraisal of the methodological quality of studies. The synthesized findings will be assessed using the ConQual approach.

Discussion: The synthesis of qualitative studies on this topic will provide insights into the nuanced and varied experiences of patients receiving chemotherapy within the comfort of their homes. The review will also provide evidence-based recommendations to policymakers and healthcare administrators, to support the implementation of HBC for patients.

Systematic review registration: Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42024500476.

接受居家化疗的癌症患者的经历和看法:定性系统综述方案。
背景:家庭化疗(HBC)已成为治疗各类癌症的标准选择,主要是为了减少治疗的等待时间。随着家庭化疗得到越来越多的认可,目前正在进行的研究正在深入探讨癌症患者在家庭环境中接受化疗或在离家较近的地方接受化疗的经历。了解这些经历对于在传统医院环境之外使用化疗方法至关重要。本综述旨在综合并批判性地评估那些调查在家庭环境中接受肠外化疗的癌症患者的经历和观点的定性研究。研究结果将用于制定循证政策,以支持家庭护理模式:本综述将遵循 JBI 定性证据系统性综述的方法。检索数据库包括 MEDLINE (PubMed)、CINAHL (EBSCOhost)、PsycINFO (EBSCOhost)、ProQuest Health and Medical Collection、两个中文数据库 CNKI 和 Wanfang 以及一个泰文数据库 ThaiJO。以英文、中文和泰文发表的研究将被考虑纳入。两名审稿人将独立完成研究的筛选、数据提取以及研究方法质量的批判性评估。综合结果将采用 ConQual 方法进行评估:对这一主题的定性研究进行综述将有助于深入了解患者在舒适的家中接受化疗的细微差别和不同经历。该综述还将为政策制定者和医疗管理者提供基于证据的建议,以支持为患者实施家庭化疗:系统综述注册系统综述注册:prospero crd42024500476。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Systematic Reviews
Systematic Reviews Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
241
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Systematic Reviews encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. The journal publishes high quality systematic review products including systematic review protocols, systematic reviews related to a very broad definition of health, rapid reviews, updates of already completed systematic reviews, and methods research related to the science of systematic reviews, such as decision modelling. At this time Systematic Reviews does not accept reviews of in vitro studies. The journal also aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted systematic reviews are published, regardless of their outcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信