'Does this fecal microbiota transplant work?' Quality assurance of capsule based fecal microbiota transplant production.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Emil Ainsworth Jochumsen, Maja Skov Kragsnaes, Anna Christine Nilsson, Kristina Fruerlund Rasmussen, Torkell Ellingsen, Mie Agerbaek Juul, Jens Kjeldsen, Dorte Kinggaard Holm
{"title":"'Does this fecal microbiota transplant work?' Quality assurance of capsule based fecal microbiota transplant production.","authors":"Emil Ainsworth Jochumsen, Maja Skov Kragsnaes, Anna Christine Nilsson, Kristina Fruerlund Rasmussen, Torkell Ellingsen, Mie Agerbaek Juul, Jens Kjeldsen, Dorte Kinggaard Holm","doi":"10.1080/00365521.2024.2401460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fecal Microbiota Transplant (FMT) is an effective treatment for recurring Clostridioides Difficile Infections (rCDI). FMT administered <i>via</i> oral capsules (caFMT) offers several practical advantages to conventional liquid FMT. We began using caFMT in 2021 imported from an external institution. Based on similar production methods, we began our own caFMT production in 2022. We aimed to evaluate the quality of our caFMT.</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>We created a database of all FMT treatments (<i>n</i> = 180) provided by our institution. Quality of all FMT was evaluated by treatment success rates. We compared our caFMT to the imported caFMT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our caFMT yielded similar success rates compared to that of the imported caFMT, 65% (CI 95% 58-72%) and 72% (CI 95% 66-79%) respectively. FMT administered <i>via</i> colonoscopy had a significantly higher success rate, 79% (CI 95% 73-85%) than own our caFMT and other routes of administration. The combined success rate of treatments increased notably for all routes of administration when repeating FMT after prior failure.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The fact that our caFMT compared similarly to the imported caFMT was viewed as a success in terms of quality assurance. Our caFMT had a slightly lower success rates compared to data from other studies, but could be affected by several other factors than our FMT-production methods. A lower success rate of caFMT compared to FMT <i>via</i> colonoscopy is acceptable due to the practical advantages offed by caFMT. Our study serves as a practical example, proving that of the standardization of caFMT production is indeed viable.</p>","PeriodicalId":21461,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00365521.2024.2401460","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Fecal Microbiota Transplant (FMT) is an effective treatment for recurring Clostridioides Difficile Infections (rCDI). FMT administered via oral capsules (caFMT) offers several practical advantages to conventional liquid FMT. We began using caFMT in 2021 imported from an external institution. Based on similar production methods, we began our own caFMT production in 2022. We aimed to evaluate the quality of our caFMT.

Study design and methods: We created a database of all FMT treatments (n = 180) provided by our institution. Quality of all FMT was evaluated by treatment success rates. We compared our caFMT to the imported caFMT.

Results: Our caFMT yielded similar success rates compared to that of the imported caFMT, 65% (CI 95% 58-72%) and 72% (CI 95% 66-79%) respectively. FMT administered via colonoscopy had a significantly higher success rate, 79% (CI 95% 73-85%) than own our caFMT and other routes of administration. The combined success rate of treatments increased notably for all routes of administration when repeating FMT after prior failure.

Discussion: The fact that our caFMT compared similarly to the imported caFMT was viewed as a success in terms of quality assurance. Our caFMT had a slightly lower success rates compared to data from other studies, but could be affected by several other factors than our FMT-production methods. A lower success rate of caFMT compared to FMT via colonoscopy is acceptable due to the practical advantages offed by caFMT. Our study serves as a practical example, proving that of the standardization of caFMT production is indeed viable.

粪便微生物群移植有用吗?基于胶囊的粪便微生物群移植生产的质量保证。
背景:粪便微生物群移植(FMT)是治疗复发性艰难梭菌感染(rCDI)的有效方法。与传统的液体 FMT 相比,通过口服胶囊(caFMT)给药的 FMT 具有一些实际优势。2021 年,我们开始使用从外部机构进口的 caFMT。基于类似的生产方法,我们于 2022 年开始自己生产 caFMT。我们的目的是评估我们的 caFMT 质量:我们建立了本机构提供的所有 FMT 治疗(n = 180)的数据库。根据治疗成功率评估所有 FMT 的质量。我们将我们的 caFMT 与进口的 caFMT 进行了比较:结果:与进口 caFMT 相比,我们的 caFMT 成功率相似,分别为 65% (CI 95% 58-72%) 和 72% (CI 95% 66-79%)。通过结肠镜进行 FMT 治疗的成功率为 79%(CI 95% 73-85%),明显高于我们的 caFMT 和其他给药途径。在先前治疗失败后再次进行 FMT 治疗时,所有给药途径的综合治疗成功率都明显提高:讨论:从质量保证的角度来看,我们的 caFMT 与进口的 caFMT 相比具有相似性,这被视为一种成功。与其他研究的数据相比,我们的 caFMT 成功率略低,但这可能受到 FMT 生产方法以外的其他一些因素的影响。与通过结肠镜进行 FMT 相比,caFMT 的成功率较低是可以接受的,因为 caFMT 具有实际优势。我们的研究是一个实践范例,证明了 caFMT 生产标准化确实可行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
222
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology is one of the most important journals for international medical research in gastroenterology and hepatology with international contributors, Editorial Board, and distribution
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信