Safety and effectiveness of acute intermittent hypoxia during a single treatment at different hypoxic severities

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 PHYSIOLOGY
Cory M. Smith, Owen F. Salmon
{"title":"Safety and effectiveness of acute intermittent hypoxia during a single treatment at different hypoxic severities","authors":"Cory M. Smith,&nbsp;Owen F. Salmon","doi":"10.1016/j.resp.2024.104358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Examine the cardiovascular, muscular function, cognitive, and neural plastic responses to determine the safety and effectiveness of acute Intermittent hypoxia (AIH) at a low, high, and control fractional inspired oxygen (FiO<sub>2</sub>) dosage</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Thirteen human participants performed 30-min of AIH in 60-s intervals at FiO2’s of 0.21 (AIH<sub>21</sub>), 0.15 (AIH<sub>15</sub>), and 0.09 (AIH<sub>9</sub>). Heart rate variability (root mean squared of successive differences; RMSSD), heart rate, oxygen saturation (SpO2), blood pressure, muscular strength, neuromuscular activation, cerebral hemodynamic responses, cognition, symptomology, and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) responses were measured before (Pre-AIH), after (post-AIH), and at 20-min of recovery (Recovery-AIH)</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were no differences between AIH protocols for heart rate, RMSSD, blood pressure, or SpO2. Muscular strength improved Post-AIH for AIH<sub>15</sub> (10 %) and AIH<sub>9</sub> (14 %) and remained elevated (6 %) at Recovery-AIH. Neuromuscular activation increased Pre-AIH to Post-AIH for AIH15 (10 %) and AIH<sub>9</sub> (11 %). Cerebral hemodynamic responses were not impacted between conditions. Both AIH<sub>15</sub> and AIH9 increased BDNF Post-AIH (62 %) and Recovery-AIH (63 %)</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Acute intermittent hypoxia is generally safe and effective at producing neural plastic responses, but further examination of co-occurring cardiovascular diseases is needed. This study provides safety focused findings which will widen the adoption and refinement of AIH protocols</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20961,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology","volume":"331 ","pages":"Article 104358"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1569904824001514","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Examine the cardiovascular, muscular function, cognitive, and neural plastic responses to determine the safety and effectiveness of acute Intermittent hypoxia (AIH) at a low, high, and control fractional inspired oxygen (FiO2) dosage

Methods

Thirteen human participants performed 30-min of AIH in 60-s intervals at FiO2’s of 0.21 (AIH21), 0.15 (AIH15), and 0.09 (AIH9). Heart rate variability (root mean squared of successive differences; RMSSD), heart rate, oxygen saturation (SpO2), blood pressure, muscular strength, neuromuscular activation, cerebral hemodynamic responses, cognition, symptomology, and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) responses were measured before (Pre-AIH), after (post-AIH), and at 20-min of recovery (Recovery-AIH)

Results

There were no differences between AIH protocols for heart rate, RMSSD, blood pressure, or SpO2. Muscular strength improved Post-AIH for AIH15 (10 %) and AIH9 (14 %) and remained elevated (6 %) at Recovery-AIH. Neuromuscular activation increased Pre-AIH to Post-AIH for AIH15 (10 %) and AIH9 (11 %). Cerebral hemodynamic responses were not impacted between conditions. Both AIH15 and AIH9 increased BDNF Post-AIH (62 %) and Recovery-AIH (63 %)

Conclusion

Acute intermittent hypoxia is generally safe and effective at producing neural plastic responses, but further examination of co-occurring cardiovascular diseases is needed. This study provides safety focused findings which will widen the adoption and refinement of AIH protocols
不同缺氧严重程度下单次急性间歇性缺氧治疗的安全性和有效性
目的:检查心血管、肌肉功能、认知和神经可塑性反应,以确定在低、高和控制分数吸入氧(FiO2)剂量下进行急性间歇性缺氧(AIH)的安全性和有效性 方法:13 名人类参与者在 FiO2 为 0.21(AIH21)、0.15(AIH15)和 0.09(AIH9)的条件下,以 60 秒为间隔进行了 30 分钟的 AIH。测量了心率变异性(连续差值的均方根;RMSSD)、心率、血氧饱和度(SpO2)、血压、肌肉力量、神经肌肉活化、脑血流动力学反应、认知、症状和脑源性神经营养因子(BDNF)反应,分别在治疗前(Pre-AIH)、治疗后(post-AIH)和恢复 20 分钟后(Recovery-AIH)进行 结果:不同的 AIH 方案在心率、RMSSD、血压或 SpO2 方面没有差异。AIH15(10%)和 AIH9(14%)在恢复-AIH 后的肌肉强度有所提高,但在恢复-AIH 时仍保持较高水平(6%)。AIH15(10%)和 AIH9(11%)的神经肌肉激活从恢复前增加到恢复后。不同条件下的脑血流动力学反应没有受到影响。AIH15和AIH9都能在AIH后(62%)和恢复期AIH(63%)增加BDNF 结论:急性间歇性缺氧在产生神经可塑性反应方面通常是安全有效的,但还需要进一步检查并发的心血管疾病。本研究提供了以安全性为重点的研究结果,这将扩大急性间歇缺氧方案的采用范围并使其更加完善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
104
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology (RESPNB) publishes original articles and invited reviews concerning physiology and pathophysiology of respiration in its broadest sense. Although a special focus is on topics in neurobiology, high quality papers in respiratory molecular and cellular biology are also welcome, as are high-quality papers in traditional areas, such as: -Mechanics of breathing- Gas exchange and acid-base balance- Respiration at rest and exercise- Respiration in unusual conditions, like high or low pressure or changes of temperature, low ambient oxygen- Embryonic and adult respiration- Comparative respiratory physiology. Papers on clinical aspects, original methods, as well as theoretical papers are also considered as long as they foster the understanding of respiratory physiology and pathophysiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信