The association between preserved ratio impaired spirometry and adverse outcomes of depression and anxiety: evidence from the UK Biobank.

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Kai Yang, Lingwei Wang, Jun Shen, Shuyu Chen, Yuanyuan Liu, Rongchang Chen
{"title":"The association between preserved ratio impaired spirometry and adverse outcomes of depression and anxiety: evidence from the UK Biobank.","authors":"Kai Yang, Lingwei Wang, Jun Shen, Shuyu Chen, Yuanyuan Liu, Rongchang Chen","doi":"10.1017/S0033291724002162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Preserved ratio impaired spirometry (PRISm) is a new lung function impairment phenotype and has been recognized as a risk factor for various adverse outcomes. We aimed to examine the associations of this new lung function impairment phenotype with depression and anxiety in longitudinal studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included 369 597 participants from the UK Biobank cohort, and divided them into population 1 without depression or anxiety and population 2 with depression or anxiety at baseline. Cox proportional hazard models were performed to evaluate the associations of lung function impairment phenotype with adverse outcomes of depression and anxiety, as well as their subtypes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At baseline, 38 879 (10.5%) participants were diagnosed with PRISm. In population 1, the adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for PRISm (<i>v.</i> normal spirometry) were 1.12 (95% CI 1.07-1.18) for incident depression, and 1.11 (95% CI 1.06-1.15) for incident anxiety, respectively. In population 2, PRISm was a risk factor for mortality in participants with depression (HR: 1.46; 95% CI 1.31-1.62) and anxiety (HR: 1.70; 95% CI 1.44-2.02), compared with normal spirometry. The magnitudes of these associations were similar in the phenotypes of lung function impairment and the subtypes of mental disorders. Trajectory analysis showed that the transition from normal spirometry to PRISm was associated with a higher risk of mortality in participants with depression and anxiety.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PRISm and airflow obstruction have similar risks of depression and anxiety. PRISm recognition may contribute to the prevention of depression and anxiety.</p>","PeriodicalId":20891,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11496235/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291724002162","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Preserved ratio impaired spirometry (PRISm) is a new lung function impairment phenotype and has been recognized as a risk factor for various adverse outcomes. We aimed to examine the associations of this new lung function impairment phenotype with depression and anxiety in longitudinal studies.

Methods: We included 369 597 participants from the UK Biobank cohort, and divided them into population 1 without depression or anxiety and population 2 with depression or anxiety at baseline. Cox proportional hazard models were performed to evaluate the associations of lung function impairment phenotype with adverse outcomes of depression and anxiety, as well as their subtypes.

Results: At baseline, 38 879 (10.5%) participants were diagnosed with PRISm. In population 1, the adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for PRISm (v. normal spirometry) were 1.12 (95% CI 1.07-1.18) for incident depression, and 1.11 (95% CI 1.06-1.15) for incident anxiety, respectively. In population 2, PRISm was a risk factor for mortality in participants with depression (HR: 1.46; 95% CI 1.31-1.62) and anxiety (HR: 1.70; 95% CI 1.44-2.02), compared with normal spirometry. The magnitudes of these associations were similar in the phenotypes of lung function impairment and the subtypes of mental disorders. Trajectory analysis showed that the transition from normal spirometry to PRISm was associated with a higher risk of mortality in participants with depression and anxiety.

Conclusions: PRISm and airflow obstruction have similar risks of depression and anxiety. PRISm recognition may contribute to the prevention of depression and anxiety.

肺活量保留率受损与抑郁和焦虑的不良后果之间的关系:英国生物库提供的证据。
背景:肺活量保留比值受损(PRISm)是一种新的肺功能受损表型,已被认为是导致各种不良后果的风险因素。我们的目的是在纵向研究中考察这种新的肺功能损伤表型与抑郁和焦虑的关系:我们纳入了英国生物库队列中的 369 597 名参与者,并将他们分为基线时无抑郁或焦虑症的人群 1 和有抑郁或焦虑症的人群 2。采用 Cox 比例危险模型评估肺功能损伤表型与抑郁和焦虑不良结局及其亚型的相关性:基线时,38 879 名参与者(10.5%)被诊断为 PRISm。在人群 1 中,PRISm(与正常肺活量相比)与抑郁症和焦虑症的调整危险比(HRs)分别为 1.12(95% CI 1.07-1.18)和 1.11(95% CI 1.06-1.15)。在人群 2 中,与正常肺活量相比,PRISm 是抑郁症参与者(HR:1.46;95% CI 1.31-1.62)和焦虑症参与者(HR:1.70;95% CI 1.44-2.02)的死亡风险因素。在肺功能受损的表型和精神障碍的亚型中,这些关联的程度相似。轨迹分析表明,从肺活量正常到 PRISm 的转变与抑郁症和焦虑症患者较高的死亡风险有关:结论:PRISm 和气流阻塞具有类似的抑郁和焦虑风险。结论:PRISm 和气流阻塞具有相似的抑郁和焦虑风险,识别 PRISm 可能有助于预防抑郁和焦虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychological Medicine
Psychological Medicine 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
711
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Now in its fifth decade of publication, Psychological Medicine is a leading international journal in the fields of psychiatry, related aspects of psychology and basic sciences. From 2014, there are 16 issues a year, each featuring original articles reporting key research being undertaken worldwide, together with shorter editorials by distinguished scholars and an important book review section. The journal''s success is clearly demonstrated by a consistently high impact factor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信