Karin E M Diderich, Hennie T Bruggenwirth, Marieke Joosten, Florentine Thurik, Jona Mijalkovic, Marike Polak, Joan Kromosoeto, Galhana M Somers-Bolman, Myrthe van den Born, Mark Drost, Robert Jan H Galjaard, Sander Galjaard, Lies H Hoefsloot, Maarten F C M Knapen, Rick van Minkelen, Vyne van der Schoot, Marjon A van Slegtenhorst, Frank Sleutels, Kyra E Stuurman, Marjolein J A Weerts, Attie T J I Go, Martina Wilke, Malgorzata I Srebniak
{"title":"The High Diagnostic Yield of Prenatal Exome Sequencing Followed by 3400 Gene Panel Analysis in 629 Ongoing Pregnancies With Ultrasound Anomalies.","authors":"Karin E M Diderich, Hennie T Bruggenwirth, Marieke Joosten, Florentine Thurik, Jona Mijalkovic, Marike Polak, Joan Kromosoeto, Galhana M Somers-Bolman, Myrthe van den Born, Mark Drost, Robert Jan H Galjaard, Sander Galjaard, Lies H Hoefsloot, Maarten F C M Knapen, Rick van Minkelen, Vyne van der Schoot, Marjon A van Slegtenhorst, Frank Sleutels, Kyra E Stuurman, Marjolein J A Weerts, Attie T J I Go, Martina Wilke, Malgorzata I Srebniak","doi":"10.1002/pd.6676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic yield of routine exome sequencing (ES) in fetuses with ultrasound anomalies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective analysis of the ES results of 629 fetuses with isolated or multiple anomalies referred in 2019-2022. Variants in a gene panel consisting of approximately 3400 genes associated with multiple congenital anomalies and/or intellectual disability were analyzed. We used trio analysis and filtering for de novo variants, compound heterozygous variants, homozygous variants, X-linked variants, variants in imprinted genes, and known pathogenic variants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants (class five and four, respectively) were identified in 14.0% (88/629, 95% CI 11.5%-16.9%) of cases. In the current cohort, the probability of detecting a monogenetic disorder was ∼1:7 (88/629, 95% CI 1:8.7-1:5.9), ranging from 1:9 (49/424) in cases with one major anomaly to 1:5 (32/147) in cases with multiple system anomalies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results indicate that a notable number of fetuses (1:7) with ultrasound anomalies and a normal chromosomal microarray have a (likely) pathogenic variant that can be detected through prenatal ES. These results warrant implementation of exome sequencing in selected cases, including those with an isolated anomaly on prenatal ultrasound.</p>","PeriodicalId":20387,"journal":{"name":"Prenatal Diagnosis","volume":" ","pages":"1444-1450"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prenatal Diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.6676","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic yield of routine exome sequencing (ES) in fetuses with ultrasound anomalies.
Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of the ES results of 629 fetuses with isolated or multiple anomalies referred in 2019-2022. Variants in a gene panel consisting of approximately 3400 genes associated with multiple congenital anomalies and/or intellectual disability were analyzed. We used trio analysis and filtering for de novo variants, compound heterozygous variants, homozygous variants, X-linked variants, variants in imprinted genes, and known pathogenic variants.
Results: Pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants (class five and four, respectively) were identified in 14.0% (88/629, 95% CI 11.5%-16.9%) of cases. In the current cohort, the probability of detecting a monogenetic disorder was ∼1:7 (88/629, 95% CI 1:8.7-1:5.9), ranging from 1:9 (49/424) in cases with one major anomaly to 1:5 (32/147) in cases with multiple system anomalies.
Conclusions: Our results indicate that a notable number of fetuses (1:7) with ultrasound anomalies and a normal chromosomal microarray have a (likely) pathogenic variant that can be detected through prenatal ES. These results warrant implementation of exome sequencing in selected cases, including those with an isolated anomaly on prenatal ultrasound.
背景:本研究旨在评估常规外显子测序(ES)对超声异常胎儿的诊断率:本研究旨在评估常规外显子组测序(ES)对超声异常胎儿的诊断率:我们对2019-2022年转诊的629名孤立或多发性异常胎儿的ES结果进行了回顾性分析。分析了由约 3400 个与多发性先天性异常和/或智力障碍相关的基因组成的基因面板中的变异。我们采用了三元分析法,并对新发变异、复合杂合变异、同源变异、X连锁变异、印记基因中的变异以及已知致病变异进行了筛选:14.0%的病例(88/629,95% CI 11.5%-16.9%)发现了致病变异和可能致病变异(分别为五级和四级)。在目前的队列中,发现单基因遗传疾病的概率为1:7(88/629,95% CI 1:8.7-1:5.9),从一个主要异常病例的1:9(49/424)到多个系统异常病例的1:5(32/147)不等:我们的研究结果表明,在超声异常和染色体微阵列正常的胎儿中,有相当多的胎儿(1:7)存在可通过产前 ES 检测到的(可能的)致病变异。这些结果证明,有必要对部分病例(包括产前超声检查有孤立异常的病例)进行外显子组测序。
期刊介绍:
Prenatal Diagnosis welcomes submissions in all aspects of prenatal diagnosis with a particular focus on areas in which molecular biology and genetics interface with prenatal care and therapy, encompassing: all aspects of fetal imaging, including sonography and magnetic resonance imaging; prenatal cytogenetics, including molecular studies and array CGH; prenatal screening studies; fetal cells and cell-free nucleic acids in maternal blood and other fluids; preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD); prenatal diagnosis of single gene disorders, including metabolic disorders; fetal therapy; fetal and placental development and pathology; development and evaluation of laboratory services for prenatal diagnosis; psychosocial, legal, ethical and economic aspects of prenatal diagnosis; prenatal genetic counseling