Elise M. Weerts, Bryan W. Jenkins, Robbie Y. Kuang, Alma Hausker, Catherine F. Moore
{"title":"Orally administered Cannabigerol (CBG) in rats: Cannabimimetic actions, anxiety-like behavior, and inflammation-induced pain","authors":"Elise M. Weerts, Bryan W. Jenkins, Robbie Y. Kuang, Alma Hausker, Catherine F. Moore","doi":"10.1016/j.pbb.2024.173883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cannabigerol (CBG) is a phytocannabinoid found in cannabis that is promoted for medical use and other health benefits, but current empirical data on the behavioral effects of CBG are lacking. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of a wide dose range of orally administered CBG on outcomes related to its potential cannabimimetic effects (cannabinoid tetrad), as well as effects on anxiety-like behavior, inflammation and related pain hypersensitivity. In a series of experiments, male and female Sprague Dawley rats received oral CBG (per os [p.o.]) or vehicle prior to testing of effects on 1) the cannabinoid tetrad (30–600 mg/kg, p.o.): assessments of locomotor activity, body temperature, antinociception (tail flick test), and catalepsy (bar test); 2) acoustic startle response (ASR) test of anxiety-like behavior (30–300 mg/kg, p.o.); 3) carrageenan-induced inflammation (paw edema), hyperalgesia (Hargreaves test), and allodynia (von Frey test) tests (10–60 mg/kg, p.o.). Positive control groups were administered THC (0–30 mg/kg, p.o.) for the cannabinoid tetrad assay, the benzodiazepine lorazepam (0–3 mg/kg, intraperitoneal [i.p.]) for the ASR test, or the opioid analgesic morphine (0–10 mg/kg, i.p.) for the carrageenan-induced inflammation and pain hypersensitivity tests. CBG did not produce cannabimimetic actions in the tetrad, but increased locomotor activity at the highest doses (300–600 mg/kg). THC produced typical dose-related cannabimimetic effects. CBG did not produce anxiolytic effects in the ASR test, while groups pretreated with lorazepam showed reductions in ASR. Finally, pretreatment with CBG prior to an intraplantar injection of carrageenan did not prevent the induction of an acute inflammatory state (i.e., increased paw edema and associated hyperalgesia and allodynia). In contrast, morphine alleviated hyperalgesia and allodynia induced by intraplantar carrageenan but did not affect the development of paw edema. In sum, these data do not support the use of oral CBG for anxiety or inflammatory pain.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19893,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior","volume":"245 ","pages":"Article 173883"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0091305724001771","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Cannabigerol (CBG) is a phytocannabinoid found in cannabis that is promoted for medical use and other health benefits, but current empirical data on the behavioral effects of CBG are lacking. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of a wide dose range of orally administered CBG on outcomes related to its potential cannabimimetic effects (cannabinoid tetrad), as well as effects on anxiety-like behavior, inflammation and related pain hypersensitivity. In a series of experiments, male and female Sprague Dawley rats received oral CBG (per os [p.o.]) or vehicle prior to testing of effects on 1) the cannabinoid tetrad (30–600 mg/kg, p.o.): assessments of locomotor activity, body temperature, antinociception (tail flick test), and catalepsy (bar test); 2) acoustic startle response (ASR) test of anxiety-like behavior (30–300 mg/kg, p.o.); 3) carrageenan-induced inflammation (paw edema), hyperalgesia (Hargreaves test), and allodynia (von Frey test) tests (10–60 mg/kg, p.o.). Positive control groups were administered THC (0–30 mg/kg, p.o.) for the cannabinoid tetrad assay, the benzodiazepine lorazepam (0–3 mg/kg, intraperitoneal [i.p.]) for the ASR test, or the opioid analgesic morphine (0–10 mg/kg, i.p.) for the carrageenan-induced inflammation and pain hypersensitivity tests. CBG did not produce cannabimimetic actions in the tetrad, but increased locomotor activity at the highest doses (300–600 mg/kg). THC produced typical dose-related cannabimimetic effects. CBG did not produce anxiolytic effects in the ASR test, while groups pretreated with lorazepam showed reductions in ASR. Finally, pretreatment with CBG prior to an intraplantar injection of carrageenan did not prevent the induction of an acute inflammatory state (i.e., increased paw edema and associated hyperalgesia and allodynia). In contrast, morphine alleviated hyperalgesia and allodynia induced by intraplantar carrageenan but did not affect the development of paw edema. In sum, these data do not support the use of oral CBG for anxiety or inflammatory pain.
期刊介绍:
Pharmacology Biochemistry & Behavior publishes original reports in the areas of pharmacology and biochemistry in which the primary emphasis and theoretical context are behavioral. Contributions may involve clinical, preclinical, or basic research. Purely biochemical or toxicology studies will not be published. Papers describing the behavioral effects of novel drugs in models of psychiatric, neurological and cognitive disorders, and central pain must include a positive control unless the paper is on a disease where such a drug is not available yet. Papers focusing on physiological processes (e.g., peripheral pain mechanisms, body temperature regulation, seizure activity) are not accepted as we would like to retain the focus of Pharmacology Biochemistry & Behavior on behavior and its interaction with the biochemistry and neurochemistry of the central nervous system. Papers describing the effects of plant materials are generally not considered, unless the active ingredients are studied, the extraction method is well described, the doses tested are known, and clear and definite experimental evidence on the mechanism of action of the active ingredients is provided.