Efficacy, Safety and Acceptability of a Very-Low-Energy Diet in Adolescents with Obesity: A Fast Track to Health Sub-Study.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Nutrients Pub Date : 2024-09-16 DOI:10.3390/nu16183125
Megan L Gow, Hiba Jebeile, Eve T House, Shirley Alexander, Louise A Baur, Justin Brown, Clare E Collins, Chris T Cowell, Kaitlin Day, Sarah P Garnett, Alicia Grunseit, Mary-Kate Inkster, Cathy Kwok, Sarah Lang, Susan J Paxton, Helen Truby, Krista A Varady, Natalie B Lister
{"title":"Efficacy, Safety and Acceptability of a Very-Low-Energy Diet in Adolescents with Obesity: A Fast Track to Health Sub-Study.","authors":"Megan L Gow, Hiba Jebeile, Eve T House, Shirley Alexander, Louise A Baur, Justin Brown, Clare E Collins, Chris T Cowell, Kaitlin Day, Sarah P Garnett, Alicia Grunseit, Mary-Kate Inkster, Cathy Kwok, Sarah Lang, Susan J Paxton, Helen Truby, Krista A Varady, Natalie B Lister","doi":"10.3390/nu16183125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy, safety and acceptability of a 4-week very-low-energy diet (VLED) program for adolescents with obesity. Adolescents (13-17 years) with obesity and ≥1 obesity-related complication were Fast Track to Health 52-week randomized controlled trial participants. Adolescents undertook a 4-week micronutrient-complete VLED (800 kcal/day), with weekly dietitian support. Anthropometric data were recorded at baseline and week-4 and side-effects at day 3-4, week-1, -2, -3 and -4. Adolescents completed an acceptability survey at week-4. A total of 134 adolescents (14.9 ± 1.2 years, 50% male) had a 5.5 ± 2.9 kg (<i>p</i> < 0.001) mean weight loss at week-4: 95% experienced ≥1 and 70% experienced ≥3 side-effects during the VLED program, especially during the first week. Hunger, fatigue, headache, irritability, loose stools, constipation and nausea were most common. Reporting more side-effects at day 3-4 correlated with greater weight loss at week-4 (r = -0.188, <i>p</i> = 0.03). Adolescents reported 'losing weight' (34%) and 'prescriptive structure' (28%) as the most positive aspects of VLED, while 'restrictive nature' (45%) and 'meal replacement taste' (20%) were least liked. A dietitian-monitored short-term VLED can be implemented safely and is acceptable for many adolescents seeking weight loss, despite frequent side-effects. Investigating predictors of acceptability and effectiveness could determine adolescents most suited to VLED programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":19486,"journal":{"name":"Nutrients","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11435242/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrients","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16183125","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy, safety and acceptability of a 4-week very-low-energy diet (VLED) program for adolescents with obesity. Adolescents (13-17 years) with obesity and ≥1 obesity-related complication were Fast Track to Health 52-week randomized controlled trial participants. Adolescents undertook a 4-week micronutrient-complete VLED (800 kcal/day), with weekly dietitian support. Anthropometric data were recorded at baseline and week-4 and side-effects at day 3-4, week-1, -2, -3 and -4. Adolescents completed an acceptability survey at week-4. A total of 134 adolescents (14.9 ± 1.2 years, 50% male) had a 5.5 ± 2.9 kg (p < 0.001) mean weight loss at week-4: 95% experienced ≥1 and 70% experienced ≥3 side-effects during the VLED program, especially during the first week. Hunger, fatigue, headache, irritability, loose stools, constipation and nausea were most common. Reporting more side-effects at day 3-4 correlated with greater weight loss at week-4 (r = -0.188, p = 0.03). Adolescents reported 'losing weight' (34%) and 'prescriptive structure' (28%) as the most positive aspects of VLED, while 'restrictive nature' (45%) and 'meal replacement taste' (20%) were least liked. A dietitian-monitored short-term VLED can be implemented safely and is acceptable for many adolescents seeking weight loss, despite frequent side-effects. Investigating predictors of acceptability and effectiveness could determine adolescents most suited to VLED programs.

超低能量饮食对肥胖青少年的疗效、安全性和可接受性:健康快车道子研究。
本研究旨在确定针对肥胖症青少年的 4 周极低能量饮食(VLED)计划的有效性、安全性和可接受性。青少年(13-17 岁)患有肥胖症且与肥胖相关的并发症≥1 种,他们是 "健康快车道 "52 周随机对照试验的参与者。青少年接受了为期4周的微量营养素全面VLED(800千卡/天)治疗,每周由营养师提供支持。在基线和第 4 周记录人体测量数据,在第 3-4 天、第 1 周、第 2 周、第 3 周和第 4 周记录副作用。青少年在第 4 周完成了一项可接受性调查。共有 134 名青少年(14.9 ± 1.2 岁,50% 为男性)在第 4 周时的平均体重减轻了 5.5 ± 2.9 千克(p < 0.001):95% 的青少年在 VLED 计划期间出现了≥1 种副作用,70% 的青少年出现了≥3 种副作用,尤其是在第一周。最常见的副作用是饥饿、疲劳、头痛、烦躁、便稀、便秘和恶心。在第 3-4 天报告较多副作用与第 4 周体重下降较多相关(r = -0.188,p = 0.03)。青少年认为 "减轻体重"(34%)和 "规定性结构"(28%)是 VLED 最积极的方面,而 "限制性"(45%)和 "代餐口味"(20%)则是最不受欢迎的方面。由营养师监控的短期VLED可以安全实施,尽管经常出现副作用,但对于许多寻求减肥的青少年来说是可以接受的。对可接受性和有效性的预测因素进行调查,可以确定哪些青少年最适合VLED计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nutrients
Nutrients NUTRITION & DIETETICS-
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
15.30%
发文量
4599
审稿时长
16.74 days
期刊介绍: Nutrients (ISSN 2072-6643) is an international, peer-reviewed open access advanced forum for studies related to Human Nutrition. It publishes reviews, regular research papers and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信