Association Between Perceived Noise Pollution and Sleep Quality: Findings from the 2018 Community Health Survey.

IF 1.3 4区医学 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY

Noise & Health Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-30 DOI:10.4103/nah.nah_42_24

Sujin Lee, Jae Ho Chung

{"title":"Association Between Perceived Noise Pollution and Sleep Quality: Findings from the 2018 Community Health Survey.","authors":"Sujin Lee, Jae Ho Chung","doi":"10.4103/nah.nah_42_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the potential relationship between sleep quality and perceived noise.Methods: A cross-sectional study involving 185,246 adults (81,854 men and 103,392 women) participating in the 2018 Korea Community Health Survey (KCHS) was conducted. Subjective sleep quality was assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), while perceived noise pollutants were categorized into two groups: perceived noise pollution (n = 43,638) and perceived non-noise pollution (n = 141,608). We used chi-square tests and independent sample t tests to compare differences between the perceived noise group and the non-perceived noise group, as well as multivariate logistic regression analysis to calculate adjusted odds ratios (OR) for sleep quality variables.Results: The perceived noise pollution group had significantly poor psychosocial variables (stress, depression assessed by Patient health questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)) than the perceived non-noise pollution group. Poor sleep quality (PSQI > 5) was associated with perceived noise pollution (OR 1.33, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.30-1.36, P < 0.001). In addition, sleep quality (OR 1.09; 95% CI 1.06-1.13, P < 0.001); sleep latency (OR 1.11; 95% CI 1.09-1.14, P < 0.001); sleep duration (OR 1.10; 95% CI 1.07-1.13, P < 0.001); sleep efficiency (OR 1.20; 95% CI 1.16-1.25, P < 0.001); sleep disturbance (OR 1.46; 95% CI 1.42-1.51, P < 0.001); sleep medication use (OR 1.13; 95% CI 1.07-1.20, P = 0.002); and daytime dysfunction (OR 1.23; 95% CI 1.20-1.26, P < 0.001) were associated with perceived noise pollution after confounding variables.Conclusion: Perceived noise pollution was significantly associated with poor sleep quality. Perceived noise annoyance could be used as a signal of health effects in the public community.","PeriodicalId":19195,"journal":{"name":"Noise & Health","volume":"26 122","pages":"346-353"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11539994/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Noise & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/nah.nah_42_24","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the potential relationship between sleep quality and perceived noise.

Methods: A cross-sectional study involving 185,246 adults (81,854 men and 103,392 women) participating in the 2018 Korea Community Health Survey (KCHS) was conducted. Subjective sleep quality was assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), while perceived noise pollutants were categorized into two groups: perceived noise pollution (n = 43,638) and perceived non-noise pollution (n = 141,608). We used chi-square tests and independent sample t tests to compare differences between the perceived noise group and the non-perceived noise group, as well as multivariate logistic regression analysis to calculate adjusted odds ratios (OR) for sleep quality variables.

Results: The perceived noise pollution group had significantly poor psychosocial variables (stress, depression assessed by Patient health questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)) than the perceived non-noise pollution group. Poor sleep quality (PSQI > 5) was associated with perceived noise pollution (OR 1.33, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.30-1.36, P < 0.001). In addition, sleep quality (OR 1.09; 95% CI 1.06-1.13, P < 0.001); sleep latency (OR 1.11; 95% CI 1.09-1.14, P < 0.001); sleep duration (OR 1.10; 95% CI 1.07-1.13, P < 0.001); sleep efficiency (OR 1.20; 95% CI 1.16-1.25, P < 0.001); sleep disturbance (OR 1.46; 95% CI 1.42-1.51, P < 0.001); sleep medication use (OR 1.13; 95% CI 1.07-1.20, P = 0.002); and daytime dysfunction (OR 1.23; 95% CI 1.20-1.26, P < 0.001) were associated with perceived noise pollution after confounding variables.

Conclusion: Perceived noise pollution was significantly associated with poor sleep quality. Perceived noise annoyance could be used as a signal of health effects in the public community.

查看原文本刊更多论文

感知噪音污染与睡眠质量之间的关系：2018年社区健康调查的结果。

研究目的本研究旨在调查睡眠质量与感知噪音之间的潜在关系：这项横断面研究涉及参加2018年韩国社区健康调查（KCHS）的185246名成年人（男性81854人，女性103392人）。主观睡眠质量采用匹兹堡睡眠质量指数（PSQI）进行评估，而感知到的噪声污染物分为两组：感知到的噪声污染（n = 43638）和感知到的非噪声污染（n = 141608）。我们使用卡方检验和独立样本 t 检验来比较感知噪声组和非感知噪声组之间的差异，并使用多变量逻辑回归分析来计算睡眠质量变量的调整几率比（OR）：结果：感知噪音污染组的心理社会变量（压力、抑郁，由患者健康问卷-9（PHQ-9）评估）明显低于非噪音污染组。睡眠质量差（PSQI > 5）与感知噪音污染有关（OR 1.33，95% 置信区间（CI）1.30-1.36，P < 0.001）。此外，睡眠质量（OR 1.09；95% CI 1.06-1.13，P <0.001）；睡眠潜伏期（OR 1.11；95% CI 1.09-1.14，P <0.001）；睡眠持续时间（OR 1.10；95% CI 1.07-1.13，P <0.001）；睡眠效率（OR 1.20；95% CI 1.16-1.25，P <0.001）；睡眠障碍（OR 1.46；95% CI 1.42-1.51，P <0.001）；睡眠药物使用（OR 1.13；95% CI 1.07-1.20，P =0.002）；日间功能障碍（OR 1.23；95% CI 1.20-1.26，P <0.001）与混杂变量后的感知噪声污染相关：结论：感知到的噪声污染与睡眠质量差密切相关。结论：感知噪声污染与睡眠质量差有明显关系，可将感知噪声骚扰作为影响公众健康的信号。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Noise & Health AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH

CiteScore

2.10

自引率

14.30%

发文量

审稿时长

6-12 weeks

期刊介绍： Noise and Health is the only International Journal devoted to research on all aspects of noise and its effects on human health. An inter-disciplinary journal for all professions concerned with auditory and non-auditory effects of occupational, environmental, and leisure noise. It aims to provide a forum for presentation of novel research material on a broad range of topics associated with noise pollution, its control and its detrimental effects on hearing and health. It will cover issues from basic experimental science through clinical evaluation and management, technical aspects of noise reduction systems and solutions to environmental issues relating to social and public health policy.