Peyman Razavi, Filippos Vingopoulos, Mauricio Garcia, Francesco Romano, Hanna Choi, Xinyi Ding, Itika Garg, Grace Baldwin, Rebecca Zeng, Matthew Finn, Augustine Bannerman, Hannah Wescott, Leo A Kim, Deeba Husain, Demetrios Vavvas, John B Miller
{"title":"Impaired Visual Function in Posterior Vitreous Detachment Assessed With the Active-Learning Quantitative Contrast Sensitivity Function Test.","authors":"Peyman Razavi, Filippos Vingopoulos, Mauricio Garcia, Francesco Romano, Hanna Choi, Xinyi Ding, Itika Garg, Grace Baldwin, Rebecca Zeng, Matthew Finn, Augustine Bannerman, Hannah Wescott, Leo A Kim, Deeba Husain, Demetrios Vavvas, John B Miller","doi":"10.1177/24741264241259245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> To investigate whether there is visual function impairment in patients with posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) using the active-learning quantitative contrast sensitivity function test. <b>Methods:</b> In this cross-sectional study, contrast sensitivity was measured in eyes with PVD and eyes without PVD using the quantitative contrast sensitivity function algorithm on the Adaptive Sensory Technology platform. Outcomes included the area under the log contrast sensitivity function curve, contrast acuity, and contrast sensitivity thresholds at 1 to 18 cycles per degree (cpd). Snellen visual acuity (VA) was also measured. Mixed-effects multiple linear regression analyses were performed to evaluate the association between the presence of PVD and visual function, controlling for age and lens status. <b>Results:</b> The cohort comprised 232 healthy eyes of 205 participants; of these, 80 eyes of 69 patients had PVD. There was no significant association between VA and PVD presence. However, PVD was significantly associated with decreased contrast sensitivity thresholds at 1.5 cpd (β, -0.058; <i>P</i> = .003) and 3 cpd (β, -0.067; <i>P</i> = .004). Contrast sensitivity thresholds at lower (1 cpd) or higher (6, 12, 18 cpd) spatial frequencies did not significantly correlate with PVD presence. Even in the subgroup of symptomatic PVD eyes, VA was not significantly decreased, while quantitative contrast sensitivity function outcomes showed visual function deficits at low spatial frequencies (1.5 cpd and 3 cpd). <b>Conclusions:</b> Contrast sensitivity measured with the quantitative contrast sensitivity function test showed visual function deficits in eyes with PVD that would have been missed with VA testing alone. Incorporating this test in the retina clinic might offer a more comprehensive functional assessment of eyes with PVD, serving as an adjunct outcome metric in clinical decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":17919,"journal":{"name":"Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases","volume":"8 5","pages":"533-539"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11439180/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/24741264241259245","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: To investigate whether there is visual function impairment in patients with posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) using the active-learning quantitative contrast sensitivity function test. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, contrast sensitivity was measured in eyes with PVD and eyes without PVD using the quantitative contrast sensitivity function algorithm on the Adaptive Sensory Technology platform. Outcomes included the area under the log contrast sensitivity function curve, contrast acuity, and contrast sensitivity thresholds at 1 to 18 cycles per degree (cpd). Snellen visual acuity (VA) was also measured. Mixed-effects multiple linear regression analyses were performed to evaluate the association between the presence of PVD and visual function, controlling for age and lens status. Results: The cohort comprised 232 healthy eyes of 205 participants; of these, 80 eyes of 69 patients had PVD. There was no significant association between VA and PVD presence. However, PVD was significantly associated with decreased contrast sensitivity thresholds at 1.5 cpd (β, -0.058; P = .003) and 3 cpd (β, -0.067; P = .004). Contrast sensitivity thresholds at lower (1 cpd) or higher (6, 12, 18 cpd) spatial frequencies did not significantly correlate with PVD presence. Even in the subgroup of symptomatic PVD eyes, VA was not significantly decreased, while quantitative contrast sensitivity function outcomes showed visual function deficits at low spatial frequencies (1.5 cpd and 3 cpd). Conclusions: Contrast sensitivity measured with the quantitative contrast sensitivity function test showed visual function deficits in eyes with PVD that would have been missed with VA testing alone. Incorporating this test in the retina clinic might offer a more comprehensive functional assessment of eyes with PVD, serving as an adjunct outcome metric in clinical decision-making.