Machine learning model outperforms the ACS Risk Calculator in predicting non-home discharge following primary total knee arthroplasty.

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Blake M Bacevich, Tony Lin-Wei Chen, Anirudh Buddhiraju, Michelle R Shimizu, Henry H Seo, Young-Min Kwon
{"title":"Machine learning model outperforms the ACS Risk Calculator in predicting non-home discharge following primary total knee arthroplasty.","authors":"Blake M Bacevich, Tony Lin-Wei Chen, Anirudh Buddhiraju, Michelle R Shimizu, Henry H Seo, Young-Min Kwon","doi":"10.1002/ksa.12492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Despite the increase in outpatient total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedures, many patients are still discharged to non-home locations following index surgery. The ability to accurately predict non-home discharge (NHD) following TKAs has the potential to promote a reduction in associated adverse events and excess healthcare costs. This study aimed to evaluate whether a machine learning (ML) model could outperform the American College of Surgeons (ACS) Risk Calculator in predicting NHD following TKA, using the same set of clinical variables. We hypothesised that the ML model would outperform the ACS Risk Calculator.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 365,240 patients who underwent a primary TKA between 2013 and 2020 were extracted from the ACS-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database and used to develop an artificial neural network (ANN) to predict discharge disposition following primary TKA. The ANN and ACS calculator were assessed and compared using discrimination, calibration and decision curve analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Age (>68 years), BMI (>35.5 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) and ASA Class (≥2) were found to be the most important variables in predicting NHD following TKA. When compared to the ACS calculator, the ANN model demonstrated a significantly superior ability to distinguish the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) among NHD patients and provided probability predictions well aligned with the true outcomes (AUC<sub>ANN</sub> = 0.69, AUC<sub>ACS</sub> = 0.50, p = 0.002, slope<sub>ANN</sub> = 0.85, slope<sub>ACS</sub> = 4.46, intercept<sub>ANN</sub> = 0.04, and intercept<sub>ACS</sub> = 0.06).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings support the hypothesis that machine learning models outperform the ACS Risk Calculator in predicting non-home discharge after TKA, even when constrained to the same clinical variables. Our findings underscore the potential benefits of integrating machine learning models into clinical practice for improving preoperative patient risk identification, optimisation, counselling and clinical decision-making.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>III.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.12492","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Despite the increase in outpatient total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedures, many patients are still discharged to non-home locations following index surgery. The ability to accurately predict non-home discharge (NHD) following TKAs has the potential to promote a reduction in associated adverse events and excess healthcare costs. This study aimed to evaluate whether a machine learning (ML) model could outperform the American College of Surgeons (ACS) Risk Calculator in predicting NHD following TKA, using the same set of clinical variables. We hypothesised that the ML model would outperform the ACS Risk Calculator.

Methods: Data from 365,240 patients who underwent a primary TKA between 2013 and 2020 were extracted from the ACS-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database and used to develop an artificial neural network (ANN) to predict discharge disposition following primary TKA. The ANN and ACS calculator were assessed and compared using discrimination, calibration and decision curve analysis.

Results: Age (>68 years), BMI (>35.5 kg/m2) and ASA Class (≥2) were found to be the most important variables in predicting NHD following TKA. When compared to the ACS calculator, the ANN model demonstrated a significantly superior ability to distinguish the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) among NHD patients and provided probability predictions well aligned with the true outcomes (AUCANN = 0.69, AUCACS = 0.50, p = 0.002, slopeANN = 0.85, slopeACS = 4.46, interceptANN = 0.04, and interceptACS = 0.06).

Conclusion: Our findings support the hypothesis that machine learning models outperform the ACS Risk Calculator in predicting non-home discharge after TKA, even when constrained to the same clinical variables. Our findings underscore the potential benefits of integrating machine learning models into clinical practice for improving preoperative patient risk identification, optimisation, counselling and clinical decision-making.

Level of evidence: III.

在预测初级全膝关节置换术后非居家出院方面,机器学习模型优于 ACS 风险计算器。
目的:尽管门诊全膝关节置换术(TKA)手术有所增加,但仍有许多患者在指数手术后出院到非居家地点。准确预测全膝关节置换术后非居家出院(NHD)的能力有可能促进相关不良事件和超额医疗费用的减少。本研究旨在评估机器学习(ML)模型在使用同一组临床变量预测 TKA 术后非居家出院方面是否优于美国外科学院(ACS)风险计算器。我们假设 ML 模型的预测结果将优于 ACS 风险计算器:从 ACS--国家外科质量改进计划数据库中提取了 2013 年至 2020 年间接受初级 TKA 的 365,240 名患者的数据,并利用这些数据开发了一个人工神经网络 (ANN),用于预测初级 TKA 术后的出院处置。通过判别、校准和决策曲线分析,对人工神经网络和 ACS 计算器进行了评估和比较:结果发现,年龄(>68 岁)、体重指数(>35.5 kg/m2)和 ASA 分级(≥2 级)是预测 TKA 术后 NHD 的最重要变量。与ACS计算器相比,ANN模型在区分NHD患者的接收器工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)方面表现出明显的优势,并提供了与真实结果非常一致的概率预测(AUCANN = 0.69,AUCACS = 0.50,p = 0.002,slopeANN = 0.85,slopeACS = 4.46,interceptANN = 0.04,interceptACS = 0.06):我们的研究结果支持这样的假设,即机器学习模型在预测 TKA 术后非居家出院方面优于 ACS 风险计算器,即使受限于相同的临床变量。我们的研究结果强调了将机器学习模型融入临床实践的潜在益处,以改善术前患者风险识别、优化、咨询和临床决策:证据等级:III。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信