Position-Specific Differences in Speed Profiles Among National Football League Scouting Combine Participants.

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Zachary M Gillen
{"title":"Position-Specific Differences in Speed Profiles Among National Football League Scouting Combine Participants.","authors":"Zachary M Gillen","doi":"10.1519/JSC.0000000000004958","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Gillen, ZM. Position-specific differences in speed profiles among NFL scouting combine participants. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2024-This study examined the relationships between speed profiles and athletic performance measurements from the National Football League (NFL) Scouting Combine, and position-specific differences in speed profiles. Subjects included NFL Scouting Combines participants with valid scores for the 40-yard dash, as well as the 10- and 20-yard splits of the 40-yard dash (n = 2,156). Subjects were divided into the following position groups: defensive backs (DBs, n = 421), defensive linemen (DL, n = 356), linebackers (LBs, n = 261), offensive linemen (OL, n = 354), running backs (RBs, n = 217), tight ends (TEs, n = 122), quarterbacks (QBs, n = 108), and wide receivers (WRs, n = 317). Performance measures included 40-yard dash time (with 10- and 20-yard split times), bench press repetitions to failure, vertical jump height, broad jump distance, pro-agility time, and L-cone drill time. The 40-yard dash and its splits calculated vmax, τ, and amax to reflect speed profiles. One-way analysis of variances examined position-related differences. Pearson's product moment correlation coefficients examined relationships between performance measures and speed profile variables. Skill positions (DB and WR) had the greatest vmax and amax, and lowest τ, followed by big skill positions (LB, RB, TE, QB), followed by DL, then OL with the lowest vmax and amax, and highest τ. For skill and big skill positions, vmax, τ, and amax exhibited greater relationships with combine measures, whereas OL generally had the lowest relationships. The position-specific differences in this study demonstrate potential areas of strength and weakness for certain positions. This may help guide strength and conditioning coaches desiring to improve position-specific speed and acceleration capabilities for American football players.</p>","PeriodicalId":17129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000004958","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Gillen, ZM. Position-specific differences in speed profiles among NFL scouting combine participants. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2024-This study examined the relationships between speed profiles and athletic performance measurements from the National Football League (NFL) Scouting Combine, and position-specific differences in speed profiles. Subjects included NFL Scouting Combines participants with valid scores for the 40-yard dash, as well as the 10- and 20-yard splits of the 40-yard dash (n = 2,156). Subjects were divided into the following position groups: defensive backs (DBs, n = 421), defensive linemen (DL, n = 356), linebackers (LBs, n = 261), offensive linemen (OL, n = 354), running backs (RBs, n = 217), tight ends (TEs, n = 122), quarterbacks (QBs, n = 108), and wide receivers (WRs, n = 317). Performance measures included 40-yard dash time (with 10- and 20-yard split times), bench press repetitions to failure, vertical jump height, broad jump distance, pro-agility time, and L-cone drill time. The 40-yard dash and its splits calculated vmax, τ, and amax to reflect speed profiles. One-way analysis of variances examined position-related differences. Pearson's product moment correlation coefficients examined relationships between performance measures and speed profile variables. Skill positions (DB and WR) had the greatest vmax and amax, and lowest τ, followed by big skill positions (LB, RB, TE, QB), followed by DL, then OL with the lowest vmax and amax, and highest τ. For skill and big skill positions, vmax, τ, and amax exhibited greater relationships with combine measures, whereas OL generally had the lowest relationships. The position-specific differences in this study demonstrate potential areas of strength and weakness for certain positions. This may help guide strength and conditioning coaches desiring to improve position-specific speed and acceleration capabilities for American football players.

全美橄榄球联盟球探联合试训参赛选手在速度特征方面的特定位置差异。
摘要: Gillen, ZM.美国国家橄榄球联盟球探联合试训参加者在速度特征方面的位置差异。J Strength Cond Res XX(X):000-000,2024-这项研究考察了美国国家橄榄球联盟(NFL)球探联合试训中速度曲线与运动表现测量值之间的关系,以及速度曲线的位置特异性差异。研究对象包括在 40 码短跑以及 40 码短跑的 10 码和 20 码劈叉中获得有效成绩的 NFL 球探联合试训参与者(n = 2,156 人)。受试者被分为以下位置组:防守后卫(DBs,n = 421)、防守后卫(DLs,n = 356)、后卫(LBs,n = 261)、进攻后卫(OLs,n = 354)、跑卫(RBs,n = 217)、近端(TEs,n = 122)、四分卫(QBs,n = 108)和外接手(WRs,n = 317)。成绩测量指标包括 40 码短跑时间(10 码和 20 码分段时间)、卧推至失败次数、纵跳高度、宽跳距离、亲身敏捷时间和 L 型锥体训练时间。40 码短跑及其劈叉计算出了 vmax、τ 和 amax,以反映速度曲线。单因子方差分析检验了与位置有关的差异。皮尔逊积矩相关系数检验了成绩测量和速度曲线变量之间的关系。技能位置(DB 和 WR)的 vmax 和 amax 最大,τ 最低,其次是大技能位置(LB、RB、TE、QB),再次是 DL,然后是 OL,其 vmax 和 amax 最低,τ 最高。本研究中特定位置的差异表明了某些位置的潜在优势和劣势领域。这可能有助于指导希望提高美式橄榄球运动员特定位置速度和加速能力的力量和体能教练。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
9.40%
发文量
384
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The editorial mission of The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research (JSCR) is to advance the knowledge about strength and conditioning through research. A unique aspect of this journal is that it includes recommendations for the practical use of research findings. While the journal name identifies strength and conditioning as separate entities, strength is considered a part of conditioning. This journal wishes to promote the publication of peer-reviewed manuscripts which add to our understanding of conditioning and sport through applied exercise science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信