Pedro Henrique da Hora Sales, Demóstenes Alves Diniz, Paulo Goberlânio de Barros Silva, Alessandra de Albuquerque Tavares Carvalho, Paolo Vescovi, Marco Meleti, Jair Carneiro Leão
{"title":"Effectiveness of trans-sinus dental implants in the complete arch rehabilitation of the edentulous maxilla: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Pedro Henrique da Hora Sales, Demóstenes Alves Diniz, Paulo Goberlânio de Barros Silva, Alessandra de Albuquerque Tavares Carvalho, Paolo Vescovi, Marco Meleti, Jair Carneiro Leão","doi":"10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.08.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Statement of problem: </strong>Systematic reviews to determine the effectiveness of oral rehabilitation with trans-sinus dental implants in patients with an atrophic maxilla are lacking.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this systematic review was to determine the effectiveness of trans-sinus dental implants installed in patients with an atrophic maxilla.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Searches were conducted in 5 databases including the nonpeer-reviewed literature up to March 2024 by 2 independent reviewers according to established inclusion and exclusion criteria and according to the question: Can trans-sinus implants be a suitable option for the rehabilitation of the atrophic maxilla? The meta-analysis was carried out using the Revman software program for the variables implant loss and marginal bone loss using a 95% confidence interval. The risk of bias in the studies was determined using the ROBINS I tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1884 articles were initially found in the researched databases, of which 4 were included in this systematic review. Three were observational studies, and 1 a randomized clinical trial. A total of 144 participants with 658 implants were evaluated (207 trans-sinus) with a 97.2% effectiveness. No statistically significant difference was found in effectiveness when comparing trans-sinus implants and conventional implants (P=.14, I2: 0%), and also no statistically significant difference was found in relation to marginal bone loss between the groups (P=.47, I2: 91%). None of the studies analyzed presented a low risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of trans-sinus implants in the rehabilitation of atrophic edentulous jaws represents a suitable option with a high success rate. However, the small number of controlled studies on the subject and the high risk of bias are important factors that must be considered before choosing this therapy. New controlled studies with high methodological rigor must be carried out to determine the effectiveness of trans-sinus implants in the rehabilitation of atrophic jaws.</p>","PeriodicalId":16866,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.08.003","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Statement of problem: Systematic reviews to determine the effectiveness of oral rehabilitation with trans-sinus dental implants in patients with an atrophic maxilla are lacking.
Purpose: The purpose of this systematic review was to determine the effectiveness of trans-sinus dental implants installed in patients with an atrophic maxilla.
Material and methods: Searches were conducted in 5 databases including the nonpeer-reviewed literature up to March 2024 by 2 independent reviewers according to established inclusion and exclusion criteria and according to the question: Can trans-sinus implants be a suitable option for the rehabilitation of the atrophic maxilla? The meta-analysis was carried out using the Revman software program for the variables implant loss and marginal bone loss using a 95% confidence interval. The risk of bias in the studies was determined using the ROBINS I tool.
Results: A total of 1884 articles were initially found in the researched databases, of which 4 were included in this systematic review. Three were observational studies, and 1 a randomized clinical trial. A total of 144 participants with 658 implants were evaluated (207 trans-sinus) with a 97.2% effectiveness. No statistically significant difference was found in effectiveness when comparing trans-sinus implants and conventional implants (P=.14, I2: 0%), and also no statistically significant difference was found in relation to marginal bone loss between the groups (P=.47, I2: 91%). None of the studies analyzed presented a low risk of bias.
Conclusions: The use of trans-sinus implants in the rehabilitation of atrophic edentulous jaws represents a suitable option with a high success rate. However, the small number of controlled studies on the subject and the high risk of bias are important factors that must be considered before choosing this therapy. New controlled studies with high methodological rigor must be carried out to determine the effectiveness of trans-sinus implants in the rehabilitation of atrophic jaws.
期刊介绍：
The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry is the leading professional journal devoted exclusively to prosthetic and restorative dentistry. The Journal is the official publication for 24 leading U.S. international prosthodontic organizations. The monthly publication features timely, original peer-reviewed articles on the newest techniques, dental materials, and research findings. The Journal serves prosthodontists and dentists in advanced practice, and features color photos that illustrate many step-by-step procedures. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry is included in Index Medicus and CINAHL.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
