Towards precision dosing in psychiatry: Population pharmacokinetics meta-modelling of clozapine and lithium.

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Psychopharmacology Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-29 DOI:10.1177/02698811241275630
Aurélie Lereclus, Julien Welzel, Raoul Belzeaux, Théo Korchia, Frédéric Dayan, Olivier Blin, Sylvain Benito, Romain Guilhaumou
{"title":"Towards precision dosing in psychiatry: Population pharmacokinetics meta-modelling of clozapine and lithium.","authors":"Aurélie Lereclus, Julien Welzel, Raoul Belzeaux, Théo Korchia, Frédéric Dayan, Olivier Blin, Sylvain Benito, Romain Guilhaumou","doi":"10.1177/02698811241275630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Treatment optimization is mandatory in psychiatric diseases and the use of population pharmacokinetics (popPK) models through model informed precision dosing (MIPD) has the potential to improve patient medical care. In this perspective, meta-modelling methods could provide popPK models with improved predictive performances and most of covariates of interest. The aims of this study were to develop meta-models of clozapine and lithium, assess their predictability and propose optimized dosing regimens for both drugs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two popPK models for each drug were retained to develop the meta-models. For clozapine, the model with the best predictive performances and gender as a covariate and one with smoking status were retained. For lithium, the model with the best predictive performances and fat-free mass as covariate and one with glomerular filtration rate were retained.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both meta-models showed improved predictability compared to the original models. Clozapine meta-model simulations allowed us to propose dosing regimen according to gender and smoking status. Steady-state doses ranged from 375 to 725 mg/day for clozapine once daily, and from 350 to 650 mg/day for clozapine twice daily. Lithium meta-model simulations allowed us to propose dosing regimen according to weight, body mass index, gender and GFR. Our steady-state dose propositions ranged from 625 to 1125 mg/day for males, and from 375 to 750 mg/day for females.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both meta-models met the acceptability criteria for use in clinical practice on all subpopulations of interest. Those models could be used in the perspective of MIPD for clozapine and lithium.</p>","PeriodicalId":16892,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychopharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"1054-1062"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02698811241275630","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Treatment optimization is mandatory in psychiatric diseases and the use of population pharmacokinetics (popPK) models through model informed precision dosing (MIPD) has the potential to improve patient medical care. In this perspective, meta-modelling methods could provide popPK models with improved predictive performances and most of covariates of interest. The aims of this study were to develop meta-models of clozapine and lithium, assess their predictability and propose optimized dosing regimens for both drugs.

Methods: Two popPK models for each drug were retained to develop the meta-models. For clozapine, the model with the best predictive performances and gender as a covariate and one with smoking status were retained. For lithium, the model with the best predictive performances and fat-free mass as covariate and one with glomerular filtration rate were retained.

Results: Both meta-models showed improved predictability compared to the original models. Clozapine meta-model simulations allowed us to propose dosing regimen according to gender and smoking status. Steady-state doses ranged from 375 to 725 mg/day for clozapine once daily, and from 350 to 650 mg/day for clozapine twice daily. Lithium meta-model simulations allowed us to propose dosing regimen according to weight, body mass index, gender and GFR. Our steady-state dose propositions ranged from 625 to 1125 mg/day for males, and from 375 to 750 mg/day for females.

Conclusion: Both meta-models met the acceptability criteria for use in clinical practice on all subpopulations of interest. Those models could be used in the perspective of MIPD for clozapine and lithium.

在精神病学中实现精确用药:氯氮平和锂的群体药代动力学元模型。
背景:在精神疾病中,优化治疗是必须的,而通过模型告知精确用药(MIPD)使用群体药代动力学(popPK)模型有可能改善患者的医疗护理。从这个角度来看,元建模方法可以提供具有更好预测性能和大多数相关协变量的 popPK 模型。本研究的目的是开发氯氮平和锂的元模型,评估它们的可预测性,并提出这两种药物的优化给药方案:每种药物都保留了两个 popPK 模型来建立元模型。对于氯氮平,保留了预测性能最好、以性别为协变量的模型,以及一个以吸烟状况为协变量的模型。对于锂,保留了预测效果最好的、以去脂体重为协变量的模型和以肾小球滤过率为协变量的模型:结果:与原始模型相比,两个元模型的预测能力都有所提高。通过氯氮平元模型模拟,我们可以根据性别和吸烟状况提出用药方案。氯氮平每日一次的稳定状态剂量为 375 至 725 毫克/天,氯氮平每日两次的稳定状态剂量为 350 至 650 毫克/天。通过锂元模型模拟,我们可以根据体重、体重指数、性别和肾小球滤过率提出用药方案。我们的稳态剂量建议男性为 625 至 1125 毫克/天,女性为 375 至 750 毫克/天:两个元模型都符合在临床实践中用于所有相关亚人群的可接受性标准。这些模型可用于氯氮平和锂的 MIPD。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Psychopharmacology
Journal of Psychopharmacology 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
4.90%
发文量
126
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Psychopharmacology is a fully peer-reviewed, international journal that publishes original research and review articles on preclinical and clinical aspects of psychopharmacology. The journal provides an essential forum for researchers and practicing clinicians on the effects of drugs on animal and human behavior, and the mechanisms underlying these effects. The Journal of Psychopharmacology is truly international in scope and readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信