Abandonment of paediatric peripheral intravenous catheter insertion in the emergency department: A retrospective cohort study.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Zoe Clarke, Clayton Lam, Amy L Sweeny, Peter J Snelling
{"title":"Abandonment of paediatric peripheral intravenous catheter insertion in the emergency department: A retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Zoe Clarke, Clayton Lam, Amy L Sweeny, Peter J Snelling","doi":"10.1111/jpc.16675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Children and their families have reported peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) insertion as the most stressful part of their emergency department (ED) encounter, with some enduring multiple attempts without a successful insertion. The purpose of this study was to identify factors associated with abandonment of paediatric PIVC insertion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted at the Gold Coast University Hospital. All patients 16 years of age and younger, presented in 2019 with a PIVC insertion attempted in the ED were eligible. The electronic medical records were screened by two reviewers to identify those who required a PIVC insertion. Logistic regression analysis was performed to assess variables associated with PIVC insertion abandonment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 6394 records screened, 2401 (8.3%) had a PIVC insertion attempted, with 99 (4.1%) being abandoned. Age <12 months was the strongest predictor of PIVC abandonment at a rate of 11.3% (38/336), with a >10-fold increased risk for infants less than 3 months old and 3-12 months old; adjusted odds ratio (95% confidence interval) 12.4 (5.1-30.2) and 14.8 (5.8-37.4), respectively. Indications of 'infection' or 'rehydration' were associated with a decreased likelihood of abandonment when compared to 'investigation only' in multivariate modelling (odds ratio (95% confidence interval): 0.181 (0.099-0.332) and 0.262 (0.100-0.686), respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study suggests the rate of PIVC insertion abandonment in children is relatively infrequent. However, more than one in 10 children aged <12 months had PIVC attempts without successful insertion. PIVC abandonment was less likely when there was an indication that necessitated PIVC insertion, such as a serious bacterial infection.</p>","PeriodicalId":16648,"journal":{"name":"Journal of paediatrics and child health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of paediatrics and child health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jpc.16675","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Children and their families have reported peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) insertion as the most stressful part of their emergency department (ED) encounter, with some enduring multiple attempts without a successful insertion. The purpose of this study was to identify factors associated with abandonment of paediatric PIVC insertion.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at the Gold Coast University Hospital. All patients 16 years of age and younger, presented in 2019 with a PIVC insertion attempted in the ED were eligible. The electronic medical records were screened by two reviewers to identify those who required a PIVC insertion. Logistic regression analysis was performed to assess variables associated with PIVC insertion abandonment.

Results: Of 6394 records screened, 2401 (8.3%) had a PIVC insertion attempted, with 99 (4.1%) being abandoned. Age <12 months was the strongest predictor of PIVC abandonment at a rate of 11.3% (38/336), with a >10-fold increased risk for infants less than 3 months old and 3-12 months old; adjusted odds ratio (95% confidence interval) 12.4 (5.1-30.2) and 14.8 (5.8-37.4), respectively. Indications of 'infection' or 'rehydration' were associated with a decreased likelihood of abandonment when compared to 'investigation only' in multivariate modelling (odds ratio (95% confidence interval): 0.181 (0.099-0.332) and 0.262 (0.100-0.686), respectively).

Conclusions: This study suggests the rate of PIVC insertion abandonment in children is relatively infrequent. However, more than one in 10 children aged <12 months had PIVC attempts without successful insertion. PIVC abandonment was less likely when there was an indication that necessitated PIVC insertion, such as a serious bacterial infection.

急诊科放弃儿科外周静脉导管插入术:一项回顾性队列研究。
目的:据儿童及其家人反映,外周静脉导管(PIVC)插入是他们在急诊科(ED)就诊过程中压力最大的部分,有些人多次尝试都没有成功插入。本研究旨在确定与放弃儿科 PIVC 插管相关的因素:方法:黄金海岸大学医院开展了一项回顾性队列研究。所有于 2019 年在急诊室尝试插入 PIVC 的 16 岁及以下患者均符合条件。两名审查员对电子病历进行筛选,以确定需要插入 PIVC 的患者。进行了逻辑回归分析,以评估与放弃插入 PIVC 相关的变量:结果:在筛选出的 6394 份记录中,有 2401 份(8.3%)曾尝试插入 PIVC,其中 99 份(4.1%)被放弃。年龄小于 3 个月和 3-12 个月的婴儿的风险增加了 10 倍;调整后的几率比(95% 置信区间)分别为 12.4(5.1-30.2)和 14.8(5.8-37.4)。在多变量模型中,与 "仅调查 "相比,"感染 "或 "补液 "与放弃的可能性降低相关(几率比(95% 置信区间):0.181(0.0.0%)):结论:本研究表明,儿童放弃插入 PIVC 的情况相对较少。然而,每 10 名儿童中就有超过一名
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
487
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health publishes original research articles of scientific excellence in paediatrics and child health. Research Articles, Case Reports and Letters to the Editor are published, together with invited Reviews, Annotations, Editorial Comments and manuscripts of educational interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信