Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the perceived barriers of mammography scale

IF 1.6 4区医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY

Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research Pub Date : 2024-09-30 DOI:10.1111/jog.16090

Menekşe Nazlı Aker, Neslihan Yılmaz Sezer, Hatice Öner Cengiz

{"title":"Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the perceived barriers of mammography scale","authors":"Menekşe Nazlı Aker, Neslihan Yılmaz Sezer, Hatice Öner Cengiz","doi":"10.1111/jog.16090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Early diagnosis and screening of breast cancer are of vital importance in the fight against the disease. It is crucial to identify the underlying barriers that prevent women from undergoing mammography and to develop necessary strategies to overcome these obstacles. The purpose of this study was to adapt “The Perceived Barriers of Mammography Scale (PBMS-23)” into Turkish and to conduct a validity and reliability study.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This study used a methodological approach. The study was conducted with 233 women admitted to the Gynecology Outpatient Clinic of a university hospital. Data were collected by using the Introductory Information Form, PBMS-23, Champion's Health Belief Model Scale for Mammography Screening (CHBMS-MS). Psychometric properties of the scale were tested with content validity, confirmatory factor analysis, convergent validity, and test–retest reliability coefficient.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Content validity confirmatory factor analysis resulted in 𝜒<sup>2</sup>/SD = 1.67; CFI = 0.97, NFI = 0.92, GFI = 0.86, RMSEA = 0.054. The scale had a Cronbach's alpha of 0.87, while the subscales had Cronbach's alpha values of 0.34 to 0.80. The intraclass correlation coefficient values calculated for the test–retest reliability were between 0.83 and 0.96 for the subscales and 0.96 for the overall scale. There is a positive and statistically significant relationship (<i>p</i> < 0.01) between the CHBMS-MS barriers dimension and prejudices dimension scores and all subdimensions and the total of the PBMS-23.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The PBMS-23 was accepted as a valid and reliable tool with 23 items and eight-factor structure that can be useful in measuring Turkish women's barriers to mammography.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16593,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research","volume":"50 11","pages":"2113-2120"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jog.16090","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

Early diagnosis and screening of breast cancer are of vital importance in the fight against the disease. It is crucial to identify the underlying barriers that prevent women from undergoing mammography and to develop necessary strategies to overcome these obstacles. The purpose of this study was to adapt “The Perceived Barriers of Mammography Scale (PBMS-23)” into Turkish and to conduct a validity and reliability study.

Methods

This study used a methodological approach. The study was conducted with 233 women admitted to the Gynecology Outpatient Clinic of a university hospital. Data were collected by using the Introductory Information Form, PBMS-23, Champion's Health Belief Model Scale for Mammography Screening (CHBMS-MS). Psychometric properties of the scale were tested with content validity, confirmatory factor analysis, convergent validity, and test–retest reliability coefficient.

Results

Content validity confirmatory factor analysis resulted in 𝜒²/SD = 1.67; CFI = 0.97, NFI = 0.92, GFI = 0.86, RMSEA = 0.054. The scale had a Cronbach's alpha of 0.87, while the subscales had Cronbach's alpha values of 0.34 to 0.80. The intraclass correlation coefficient values calculated for the test–retest reliability were between 0.83 and 0.96 for the subscales and 0.96 for the overall scale. There is a positive and statistically significant relationship (p < 0.01) between the CHBMS-MS barriers dimension and prejudices dimension scores and all subdimensions and the total of the PBMS-23.

Conclusion

The PBMS-23 was accepted as a valid and reliable tool with 23 items and eight-factor structure that can be useful in measuring Turkish women's barriers to mammography.

查看原文本刊更多论文

土耳其版乳腺 X 射线照相术障碍感知量表的心理测量特性。

目的：乳腺癌的早期诊断和筛查对防治乳腺癌至关重要。找出阻碍妇女接受乳房 X 射线照相术的潜在障碍并制定必要的策略来克服这些障碍至关重要。本研究的目的是将 "乳腺 X 射线照相术感知障碍量表（PBMS-23）"改编成土耳其语，并进行有效性和可靠性研究：本研究采用了方法学方法。研究对象为某大学医院妇科门诊的 233 名妇女。数据收集采用了介绍性信息表、PBMS-23、冠军乳腺摄影筛查健康信念模式量表（CHBMS-MS）。通过内容效度、确认性因素分析、收敛效度和测试-再测信度系数对量表的心理特性进行了测试：内容效度确认性因素分析的结果为：𝜒2/SD = 1.67；CFI = 0.97，NFI = 0.92，GFI = 0.86，RMSEA = 0.054。量表的 Cronbach's alpha 值为 0.87，而子量表的 Cronbach's alpha 值为 0.34 至 0.80。计算得出的测试-重测信度的类内相关系数值为：分量表为 0.83 至 0.96，总量表为 0.96。两者之间存在统计学意义上的显著正相关关系（p 结论：PBMS-23 被认为是一种有效的测验工具：PBMS-23是一个有效且可靠的工具，有23个项目和8个因素结构，可用于测量土耳其妇女的乳房X光检查障碍。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research 医学-妇产科学

CiteScore

3.10

自引率

0.00%

发文量

376

审稿时长

3-6 weeks

期刊介绍： The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research is the official Journal of the Asia and Oceania Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology and of the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and aims to provide a medium for the publication of articles in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology. The Journal publishes original research articles, case reports, review articles and letters to the editor. The Journal will give publication priority to original research articles over case reports. Accepted papers become the exclusive licence of the Journal. Manuscripts are peer reviewed by at least two referees and/or Associate Editors expert in the field of the submitted paper.