Is single-port laparoscopy or vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery the better option for salpingo-oophorectomy?

Abstract

Aim

To compare postoperative pain and recovery in patients undergoing oophorectomy with single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) versus vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES).

Method

Patients who underwent salpingo-oophorectomy with SPLS or vNOTES between 2016 and 2023 were analyzed retrospectively. Oophorectomy was performed based on the presence of an adnexal mass or breast cancer susceptibility gene mutation.

Results

Fifty-two patients underwent oophorectomy with SPLS and 35 underwent vNOTES. Although the mean mass size was slightly larger in the SPLS group than in the vNOTES group (8.0 ± 4.1 vs. 6.8 ± 3.3 cm), the difference was not significant. There was no difference in operating times between SPLS and vNOTES. The mean visual analog scale and faces pain scale scores 2 and 6 h postoperatively were lower in the vNOTES group. The mean quality of recovery-40 (QoR-40) score was higher in the vNOTES group (156 ± 14 vs. 148 ± 11; p = 0.009). This analysis identified vNOTES as an independent predictor of a high QoR-40 score.

Conclusion

The vNOTES group experienced less pain during the early postoperative period than the SPLS group. Although the operating and removal times were similar, the port setup time was longer for the vNOTES group.