Efficacy of a whole slide image-based prediction model for lymph node metastasis in T1 colorectal cancer: A systematic review.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Katsuro Ichimasa, Yuta Kouyama, Shin-Ei Kudo, Yuki Takashina, Tetsuo Nemoto, Jun Watanabe, Manabu Takamatsu, Yasuharu Maeda, Khay Guan Yeoh, Hideyuki Miyachi, Masashi Misawa
{"title":"Efficacy of a whole slide image-based prediction model for lymph node metastasis in T1 colorectal cancer: A systematic review.","authors":"Katsuro Ichimasa, Yuta Kouyama, Shin-Ei Kudo, Yuki Takashina, Tetsuo Nemoto, Jun Watanabe, Manabu Takamatsu, Yasuharu Maeda, Khay Guan Yeoh, Hideyuki Miyachi, Masashi Misawa","doi":"10.1111/jgh.16748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Accurate stratification of the risk of lymph node metastasis (LNM) following endoscopic resection of submucosal invasive (T1) colorectal cancer (CRC) is imperative for determining the necessity for additional surgery. In this systematic review, we evaluated the efficacy of prediction of LNM by artificial intelligence (AI) models utilizing whole slide image (WSI) in patients with T1 CRC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a systematic review was conducted through searches in PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, and the Cochrane Library for relevant studies published up to December 2023. The inclusion criteria were studies assessing the accuracy of hematoxylin and eosin-stained WSI-based AI models for predicting LNM in patients with T1 CRC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four studies met the criteria for inclusion in this systematic review. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for these AI models ranged from 0.57 to 0.76. In the three studies in which AI performance was compared directly with current treatment guidelines, AI consistently exhibited a higher area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. At a fixed sensitivity of 100%, specificities ranged from 18.4% to 45.0%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Artificial intelligence models based on WSI can potentially address the issue of diagnostic variability between pathologists and exceed the predictive accuracy of current guidelines. However, these findings require confirmation by larger studies that incorporate external validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":15877,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.16748","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aim: Accurate stratification of the risk of lymph node metastasis (LNM) following endoscopic resection of submucosal invasive (T1) colorectal cancer (CRC) is imperative for determining the necessity for additional surgery. In this systematic review, we evaluated the efficacy of prediction of LNM by artificial intelligence (AI) models utilizing whole slide image (WSI) in patients with T1 CRC.

Methods: In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a systematic review was conducted through searches in PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, and the Cochrane Library for relevant studies published up to December 2023. The inclusion criteria were studies assessing the accuracy of hematoxylin and eosin-stained WSI-based AI models for predicting LNM in patients with T1 CRC.

Results: Four studies met the criteria for inclusion in this systematic review. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for these AI models ranged from 0.57 to 0.76. In the three studies in which AI performance was compared directly with current treatment guidelines, AI consistently exhibited a higher area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. At a fixed sensitivity of 100%, specificities ranged from 18.4% to 45.0%.

Conclusions: Artificial intelligence models based on WSI can potentially address the issue of diagnostic variability between pathologists and exceed the predictive accuracy of current guidelines. However, these findings require confirmation by larger studies that incorporate external validation.

基于全切片图像的 T1 结直肠癌淋巴结转移预测模型的有效性:系统综述。
背景和目的:对粘膜下浸润性(T1)结直肠癌(CRC)内镜切除术后淋巴结转移(LNM)的风险进行准确分层是确定是否有必要进行额外手术的当务之急。在这篇系统性综述中,我们评估了人工智能(AI)模型利用全切片图像(WSI)预测 T1 CRC 患者 LNM 的效果:根据《系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目》指南,我们在 PubMed (MEDLINE)、Embase 和 Cochrane 图书馆中搜索了截至 2023 年 12 月发表的相关研究,并进行了系统综述。纳入标准是评估基于苏木精和伊红染色的 WSI AI 模型预测 T1 CRC 患者 LNM 准确性的研究:四项研究符合本系统综述的纳入标准。这些 AI 模型的接收器操作特征曲线下面积在 0.57 到 0.76 之间。在将人工智能性能与现行治疗指南进行直接比较的三项研究中,人工智能的接收器操作特征曲线下面积一直较高。在灵敏度固定为 100%的情况下,特异性从 18.4% 到 45.0% 不等:基于 WSI 的人工智能模型有可能解决病理学家之间的诊断差异问题,并超越现行指南的预测准确性。不过,这些发现还需要结合外部验证的大型研究来证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
2.40%
发文量
326
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology is produced 12 times per year and publishes peer-reviewed original papers, reviews and editorials concerned with clinical practice and research in the fields of hepatology, gastroenterology and endoscopy. Papers cover the medical, radiological, pathological, biochemical, physiological and historical aspects of the subject areas. All submitted papers are reviewed by at least two referees expert in the field of the submitted paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信