Stapled enterectomy reduces surgical time when compared with sutured enterectomy: a retrospective review of 54 cats.

IF 1.9 2区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Sorcha Costello, Benjamin McRae, Melanie Olive, Thomas A Marks, Benjamin Mielke, Jean-Philippe Billet, Andrew Levien, Rachel M Basa
{"title":"Stapled enterectomy reduces surgical time when compared with sutured enterectomy: a retrospective review of 54 cats.","authors":"Sorcha Costello, Benjamin McRae, Melanie Olive, Thomas A Marks, Benjamin Mielke, Jean-Philippe Billet, Andrew Levien, Rachel M Basa","doi":"10.1177/1098612X241264723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Feline enterectomy is commonly performed in referral and general veterinary practice; however, existing studies in the veterinary literature lack significant case numbers to guide clinical decision-making. In addition, no studies have evaluated the use of surgical staplers in cats for this procedure. This study aimed to compare the use of surgical staplers for functional end-to-end anastomosis (SFEEA) with hand-sewn end-to-end anastomosis (EEA) in cats. Additional aims included investigating the feasibility of surgical staplers in cats as well as assessing short- and long-term complications and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The medical records of four referral hospitals were retrospectively searched for cats that had undergone enterectomy between 2003 and 2022. Preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative data were compared between the SFEEA and EEA groups, with a median long-term follow-up time of 488 days (interquartile range 255-1030).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 54 cats met the inclusion criteria for this study, with 24 undergoing an SFEEA while 30 underwent EEA. There was a significant difference in surgical time between the two groups. The SFEEA group had a mean surgical time 34.3 ± 9.274 mins faster than the EEA group (<i>P</i> <0.001). Unique complications reported for the SFEEA group included haemo abdomen and anastomotic stricture.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>SFEEA should be considered in cats where anaesthetic time should be kept as short as possible, such as patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists scores of 3-4. Stricture at the anastomotic site may be seen in the long term for cats undergoing SFEEA.</p>","PeriodicalId":15851,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11457274/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1098612X241264723","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Feline enterectomy is commonly performed in referral and general veterinary practice; however, existing studies in the veterinary literature lack significant case numbers to guide clinical decision-making. In addition, no studies have evaluated the use of surgical staplers in cats for this procedure. This study aimed to compare the use of surgical staplers for functional end-to-end anastomosis (SFEEA) with hand-sewn end-to-end anastomosis (EEA) in cats. Additional aims included investigating the feasibility of surgical staplers in cats as well as assessing short- and long-term complications and outcomes.

Methods: The medical records of four referral hospitals were retrospectively searched for cats that had undergone enterectomy between 2003 and 2022. Preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative data were compared between the SFEEA and EEA groups, with a median long-term follow-up time of 488 days (interquartile range 255-1030).

Results: In total, 54 cats met the inclusion criteria for this study, with 24 undergoing an SFEEA while 30 underwent EEA. There was a significant difference in surgical time between the two groups. The SFEEA group had a mean surgical time 34.3 ± 9.274 mins faster than the EEA group (P <0.001). Unique complications reported for the SFEEA group included haemo abdomen and anastomotic stricture.

Conclusions and relevance: SFEEA should be considered in cats where anaesthetic time should be kept as short as possible, such as patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists scores of 3-4. Stricture at the anastomotic site may be seen in the long term for cats undergoing SFEEA.

与缝合内膜切除术相比,缝合内膜切除术缩短了手术时间:对 54 只猫的回顾性研究。
目的:猫肠道切除术通常在转诊和普通兽医诊所进行;但是,兽医文献中的现有研究缺乏重要的病例数来指导临床决策。此外,还没有研究评估过在猫科动物中使用手术订书机进行这种手术的情况。本研究旨在比较在猫科动物中使用手术订书机进行功能性端端吻合术(SFEEA)和手缝端端吻合术(EEA)的效果。其他目的还包括调查手术订书机在猫科动物中的可行性,以及评估短期和长期并发症和结果:方法:对四家转诊医院 2003 年至 2022 年间接受过肠道切除术的猫咪的病历进行回顾性检索。比较了 SFEEA 组和 EEA 组的术前、术中和术后数据,中位长期随访时间为 488 天(四分位间范围为 255-1030 天):共有 54 只猫符合本研究的纳入标准,其中 24 只接受了 SFEEA,30 只接受了 EEA。两组的手术时间存在明显差异。SFEEA 组的平均手术时间比 EEA 组快 34.3 ± 9.274 分钟(P 结论和意义:对于需要尽可能缩短麻醉时间的猫,如美国麻醉医师协会评分为 3-4 分的患者,应考虑使用 SFEEA。长期而言,接受 SFEEA 的猫可能会在吻合口部位出现狭窄。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
17.60%
发文量
254
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: JFMS is an international, peer-reviewed journal aimed at both practitioners and researchers with an interest in the clinical veterinary healthcare of domestic cats. The journal is published monthly in two formats: ‘Classic’ editions containing high-quality original papers on all aspects of feline medicine and surgery, including basic research relevant to clinical practice; and dedicated ‘Clinical Practice’ editions primarily containing opinionated review articles providing state-of-the-art information for feline clinicians, along with other relevant articles such as consensus guidelines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信