Pharmacotherapy guideline concordance for major depressive disorder and its link to functioning via symptom change.

IF 2.1 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science Pub Date : 2024-09-16 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1017/cts.2024.562
Mason T Breitzig, Fan He, Lan Kong, Guodong Liu, Daniel A Waschbusch, Jeff D Yanosky, Duanping Liao, Erika F H Saunders
{"title":"Pharmacotherapy guideline concordance for major depressive disorder and its link to functioning via symptom change.","authors":"Mason T Breitzig, Fan He, Lan Kong, Guodong Liu, Daniel A Waschbusch, Jeff D Yanosky, Duanping Liao, Erika F H Saunders","doi":"10.1017/cts.2024.562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Alleviation of symptom severity for major depressive disorder (MDD) is known to be associated with a lagged improvement of functioning. Pharmacotherapy guidelines support algorithms for MDD treatment. However, it is currently unclear whether concordance with guidelines influences functional recovery. A guideline concordance algorithm (GCA-8) was used to measure this pathway in a naturalistic clinical setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 1403 adults (67% female, 84% non-Hispanic/Latino White, mean age of 43 years) with nonpsychotic MDD from the Penn State Psychiatry Clinical Assessment and Rating Evaluation System registry (visits from 02/01/2015 to 04/13/2021) were evaluated. Multivariable linear regression measured associations between GCA-8 and World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS) scores. Mediation by MDD symptom severity using the Patient Health Questionnaire depression module (PHQ-9) was also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study found a statistically significant improvement in WHODAS scores (functioning) between baseline and final measures (-2 points, <i>P</i> < .001) within one year. A one standard deviation increase in the GCA-8 score was associated with a 0.48-point reduction in mean disability score (total effect; <i>P</i> = .02) with significant mediation by the change in MDD symptom severity (coefficient = -0.51, <i>P</i> < .001) and a nonsignificant natural direct effect of the GCA-8 independent of PHQ-9 change (coefficient = -0.02, <i>P</i> = .92).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Higher pharmacotherapy guideline concordance is associated with better functioning for MDD patients; this association likely occurs through improvement in MDD symptom severity rather than directly.</p>","PeriodicalId":15529,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","volume":"8 1","pages":"e123"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11428114/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2024.562","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Alleviation of symptom severity for major depressive disorder (MDD) is known to be associated with a lagged improvement of functioning. Pharmacotherapy guidelines support algorithms for MDD treatment. However, it is currently unclear whether concordance with guidelines influences functional recovery. A guideline concordance algorithm (GCA-8) was used to measure this pathway in a naturalistic clinical setting.

Methods: Data from 1403 adults (67% female, 84% non-Hispanic/Latino White, mean age of 43 years) with nonpsychotic MDD from the Penn State Psychiatry Clinical Assessment and Rating Evaluation System registry (visits from 02/01/2015 to 04/13/2021) were evaluated. Multivariable linear regression measured associations between GCA-8 and World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS) scores. Mediation by MDD symptom severity using the Patient Health Questionnaire depression module (PHQ-9) was also evaluated.

Results: This study found a statistically significant improvement in WHODAS scores (functioning) between baseline and final measures (-2 points, P < .001) within one year. A one standard deviation increase in the GCA-8 score was associated with a 0.48-point reduction in mean disability score (total effect; P = .02) with significant mediation by the change in MDD symptom severity (coefficient = -0.51, P < .001) and a nonsignificant natural direct effect of the GCA-8 independent of PHQ-9 change (coefficient = -0.02, P = .92).

Conclusions: Higher pharmacotherapy guideline concordance is associated with better functioning for MDD patients; this association likely occurs through improvement in MDD symptom severity rather than directly.

重度抑郁障碍的药物治疗指南一致性及其通过症状变化与功能的联系。
简介众所周知,缓解重度抑郁障碍(MDD)的症状严重程度与功能改善的滞后性有关。药物治疗指南支持重度抑郁症的治疗算法。然而,目前还不清楚与指南的一致性是否会影响功能恢复。我们使用了指南一致性算法(GCA-8)来测量自然临床环境中的这一途径:评估了宾夕法尼亚州立精神病学临床评估和分级评价系统登记处的 1403 名非精神病性 MDD 成人(67% 为女性,84% 为非西班牙裔/拉美裔白人,平均年龄为 43 岁)的数据(就诊时间为 2015 年 1 月 2 日至 2021 年 3 月 4 日)。多变量线性回归测量了 GCA-8 和世界卫生组织残疾评估表 2.0 (WHODAS) 评分之间的关联。此外,还评估了患者健康问卷抑郁模块(PHQ-9)对 MDD 症状严重程度的调节作用:该研究发现,在一年内,基线与最终测量之间的 WHODAS 评分(功能)有了统计学意义上的显著改善(-2 分,P < .001)。GCA-8得分每增加一个标准差,平均残疾评分就会降低0.48分(总效应;P = .02),MDD症状严重程度的变化对其有明显的中介作用(系数 = -0.51,P < .001),GCA-8的自然直接效应与PHQ-9的变化无关(系数 = -0.02,P = .92):结论:药物治疗指南的一致性越高,MDD 患者的功能越好;这种关联可能是通过改善 MDD 症状的严重程度而非直接作用产生的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
26.90%
发文量
437
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信