Gözde Işik, İrem A Kafadar-Gürbüz, Fulya Elgün, Remziye U Kara, Buse Berber, Semiha Özgül, Tayfun Günbay
{"title":"Is Artificial Intelligence a Useful Tool for Clinical Practice of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery?","authors":"Gözde Işik, İrem A Kafadar-Gürbüz, Fulya Elgün, Remziye U Kara, Buse Berber, Semiha Özgül, Tayfun Günbay","doi":"10.1097/SCS.0000000000010686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to assess the usefulness of ChatGPT Plus generated responses to clinical-specific questions in oral and maxillofacial surgery. This cross-sectional study was conducted with questions composed according to the Clinical Practise Guide of Ege University, School of Dentistry, and with different subjects of oral and maxillofacial surgery at the undergraduate level. These questions were classified according to their difficulty level (easy, medium, and hard) and inputted into ChatGPT Plus. Three researchers evaluated the responses using a 7-point Likert-type accuracy scale and a modified global quality scale (range: 1-5). Also, error analysis was carried out for the questions scored ≤4 according to the accuracy assessment. A total of 66 questions were enrolled in this study. The questions included dental anesthesia, tooth extraction, preoperative and postoperative complications, suturing, writing prescriptions, and temporomandibular joint examination. The median accuracy score of ChatGPT Plus responses was 5, with 75% of the responses scoring 4 or above. The median quality score was 4, with 75% of the responses scoring 3 or above. There was a significant difference among the 3 difficulty levels, both in accuracy and quality scores (P<0.001 and 0.001, respectively). The median scores of hard-level questions were found to be lower than the easy-level and medium-level questions. The study outcomes emphasized high accuracy and quality in ChatGPT Plus's responses, except for the questions requiring a detailed response or a comment.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000010686","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study aimed to assess the usefulness of ChatGPT Plus generated responses to clinical-specific questions in oral and maxillofacial surgery. This cross-sectional study was conducted with questions composed according to the Clinical Practise Guide of Ege University, School of Dentistry, and with different subjects of oral and maxillofacial surgery at the undergraduate level. These questions were classified according to their difficulty level (easy, medium, and hard) and inputted into ChatGPT Plus. Three researchers evaluated the responses using a 7-point Likert-type accuracy scale and a modified global quality scale (range: 1-5). Also, error analysis was carried out for the questions scored ≤4 according to the accuracy assessment. A total of 66 questions were enrolled in this study. The questions included dental anesthesia, tooth extraction, preoperative and postoperative complications, suturing, writing prescriptions, and temporomandibular joint examination. The median accuracy score of ChatGPT Plus responses was 5, with 75% of the responses scoring 4 or above. The median quality score was 4, with 75% of the responses scoring 3 or above. There was a significant difference among the 3 difficulty levels, both in accuracy and quality scores (P<0.001 and 0.001, respectively). The median scores of hard-level questions were found to be lower than the easy-level and medium-level questions. The study outcomes emphasized high accuracy and quality in ChatGPT Plus's responses, except for the questions requiring a detailed response or a comment.
期刊介绍:
Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance.
Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.