Comparison of obstetrical and neonatal outcomes between fresh versus frozen-thawed testicular sperm derived from microTESE.

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
ACS Applied Electronic Materials Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-27 DOI:10.1007/s10815-024-03265-9
Nagawkar Perlov Sima Simcha, Deri Noy, Eldar-Geva Talia, Gal Michael, Reichman Orna, Or Yuval, Ben-Ami Ido
{"title":"Comparison of obstetrical and neonatal outcomes between fresh versus frozen-thawed testicular sperm derived from microTESE.","authors":"Nagawkar Perlov Sima Simcha, Deri Noy, Eldar-Geva Talia, Gal Michael, Reichman Orna, Or Yuval, Ben-Ami Ido","doi":"10.1007/s10815-024-03265-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare obstetrical and neonatal outcomes of embryo transfer cycles using fresh vs. frozen-thawed testicular sperm derived from microTESE in non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) patients.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The retrospective cohort study included a total of 48 couples diagnosed with NOA who underwent 93 ET cycles, both fresh and frozen-thawed embryos, and resulted in pregnancy. ET cycles were divided into two groups according to sperm type, fresh (46 cycles, 49.5%) or frozen (47 cycles, 50.5%) testicular sperm. The primary outcome was the birth weight of newborns correlated with gestational week (birth weight percentile).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A comparison of patients' basic characteristics and ET cycle parameters showed no significant clinical differences between the groups. A total of 172 embryos were transferred, 86 (50%) in each group. A higher rate of good-quality blastocysts was found in the fresh testicular group (83.3% vs. 50%, p = 0.046). A comparison of pregnancy outcomes showed no significant differences in clinical pregnancy, implantation, or live birth rates. A total of 53 cycles resulted in live birth, 26 (49%) and 27 (51%) in the fresh and frozen groups, respectively. No difference was found in pregnancy length, delivery mode, or obstetrical complications. A total of 61 newborns were included, 31 (51%) and 30 (49%) in fresh and frozen testicular groups, respectively. No significant differences were found in mean birth weight or birth weight percentile between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No significant differences were found in obstetrical outcomes when comparing ET cycles using fresh or frozen-thawed testicular sperm retrieved from microTESE. Moreover, there is no association between the sperm source and the birth weight of newborns.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11535137/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-024-03265-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare obstetrical and neonatal outcomes of embryo transfer cycles using fresh vs. frozen-thawed testicular sperm derived from microTESE in non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) patients.

Design: The retrospective cohort study included a total of 48 couples diagnosed with NOA who underwent 93 ET cycles, both fresh and frozen-thawed embryos, and resulted in pregnancy. ET cycles were divided into two groups according to sperm type, fresh (46 cycles, 49.5%) or frozen (47 cycles, 50.5%) testicular sperm. The primary outcome was the birth weight of newborns correlated with gestational week (birth weight percentile).

Results: A comparison of patients' basic characteristics and ET cycle parameters showed no significant clinical differences between the groups. A total of 172 embryos were transferred, 86 (50%) in each group. A higher rate of good-quality blastocysts was found in the fresh testicular group (83.3% vs. 50%, p = 0.046). A comparison of pregnancy outcomes showed no significant differences in clinical pregnancy, implantation, or live birth rates. A total of 53 cycles resulted in live birth, 26 (49%) and 27 (51%) in the fresh and frozen groups, respectively. No difference was found in pregnancy length, delivery mode, or obstetrical complications. A total of 61 newborns were included, 31 (51%) and 30 (49%) in fresh and frozen testicular groups, respectively. No significant differences were found in mean birth weight or birth weight percentile between the groups.

Conclusion: No significant differences were found in obstetrical outcomes when comparing ET cycles using fresh or frozen-thawed testicular sperm retrieved from microTESE. Moreover, there is no association between the sperm source and the birth weight of newborns.

新鲜与冷冻解冻睾丸精子的产科和新生儿预后比较。
目的:比较在非梗阻性无精子症(NOA)患者中使用从显微TESE中提取的新鲜睾丸精子与冷冻解冻睾丸精子进行胚胎移植周期的产科和新生儿结局:这项回顾性队列研究共纳入了 48 对确诊为 NOA 的夫妇,他们接受了 93 次 ET 周期(包括新鲜胚胎和冷冻解冻胚胎)并最终怀孕。ET周期根据精子类型分为两组:新鲜精子(46个周期,49.5%)或冷冻精子(47个周期,50.5%)。主要结果是新生儿出生体重与孕周的相关性(出生体重百分位数):对患者的基本特征和 ET 周期参数进行比较后发现,两组之间没有明显的临床差异。共移植了 172 个胚胎,每组各 86 个(50%)。新鲜睾丸组的优质囊胚率更高(83.3% 对 50%,P = 0.046)。妊娠结果比较显示,临床妊娠率、植入率和活产率无显著差异。共有 53 个周期获得活产,新鲜组和冷冻组分别有 26 例(49%)和 27 例(51%)。在妊娠时间、分娩方式或产科并发症方面没有发现差异。共纳入了 61 名新生儿,新鲜睾丸组和冷冻睾丸组分别有 31 名(51%)和 30 名(49%)。两组新生儿的平均出生体重和出生体重百分位数无明显差异:结论:比较使用从显微睾丸取精术(microTESE)中取出的新鲜或冷冻解冻睾丸精子进行的ET周期,产科结果无明显差异。此外,精子来源与新生儿出生体重之间也没有关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信