Prognostic Value of Estimated Glucose Disposal Rate and Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index in Non-Diabetic Patients Undergoing PCI for Chronic Total Occlusion.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Wenjie Chen, Yiming Liu, Yuchen Shi, Jinghua Liu
{"title":"Prognostic Value of Estimated Glucose Disposal Rate and Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index in Non-Diabetic Patients Undergoing PCI for Chronic Total Occlusion.","authors":"Wenjie Chen, Yiming Liu, Yuchen Shi, Jinghua Liu","doi":"10.3390/jcdd11090261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Chronic total occlusion (CTO) is a complex lesion of coronary artery disease (CAD) with a detection rate of approximately 25% on coronary angiography. CTO patients generally experience poor quality of life and prognosis. This study aims to evaluate the association between the estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR), a surrogate marker for insulin resistance (IR), and the prognosis of CTO PCI patients, as well as to investigate the potential role of the systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) in this process.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively included 1482 non-diabetic patients who underwent successful CTO PCI at Anzhen Hospital between January 2018 and December 2021. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). Clinical characteristics, biochemical markers, and interventional records were collected, and the eGDR and SII were calculated. Cox regression, restricted cubic splines (RCSs), receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, and Kaplan-Meier curves were used to assess associations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MACEs occurred in 158 patients (10.67%). Patients with MACEs had lower eGDR and higher SII levels. A high eGDR significantly reduced MACE risk (Q4 vs. Q1: HR 0.06, 95% CI 0.03-0.12), while a high SII increased it (Q4 vs. Q1: HR 3.32, 95% CI 1.78-6.33). The combination of low eGDRs and high SIIs predicted the highest MACE risk (HR 4.36, 95% CI 2.71-6.01). The SII partially mediated the relationship between eGDR and MACEs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A low eGDR and high SII are significant predictors of poor prognosis in non-diabetic CTO PCI patients. Combining the eGDR and the SII provides a comprehensive assessment for better predicting cardiovascular outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":15197,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11432108/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd11090261","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Chronic total occlusion (CTO) is a complex lesion of coronary artery disease (CAD) with a detection rate of approximately 25% on coronary angiography. CTO patients generally experience poor quality of life and prognosis. This study aims to evaluate the association between the estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR), a surrogate marker for insulin resistance (IR), and the prognosis of CTO PCI patients, as well as to investigate the potential role of the systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) in this process.

Methods: We retrospectively included 1482 non-diabetic patients who underwent successful CTO PCI at Anzhen Hospital between January 2018 and December 2021. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). Clinical characteristics, biochemical markers, and interventional records were collected, and the eGDR and SII were calculated. Cox regression, restricted cubic splines (RCSs), receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, and Kaplan-Meier curves were used to assess associations.

Results: MACEs occurred in 158 patients (10.67%). Patients with MACEs had lower eGDR and higher SII levels. A high eGDR significantly reduced MACE risk (Q4 vs. Q1: HR 0.06, 95% CI 0.03-0.12), while a high SII increased it (Q4 vs. Q1: HR 3.32, 95% CI 1.78-6.33). The combination of low eGDRs and high SIIs predicted the highest MACE risk (HR 4.36, 95% CI 2.71-6.01). The SII partially mediated the relationship between eGDR and MACEs.

Conclusions: A low eGDR and high SII are significant predictors of poor prognosis in non-diabetic CTO PCI patients. Combining the eGDR and the SII provides a comprehensive assessment for better predicting cardiovascular outcomes.

因慢性全闭塞而接受 PCI 治疗的非糖尿病患者的估计葡萄糖排出率和全身免疫炎症指数的预后价值
背景和目的:慢性全闭塞(CTO)是冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的一种复杂病变,冠状动脉造影的检出率约为 25%。CTO 患者的生活质量和预后普遍较差。本研究旨在评估作为胰岛素抵抗(IR)替代指标的估计葡萄糖处置率(eGDR)与 CTO PCI 患者预后之间的关联,并探讨全身免疫炎症指数(SII)在这一过程中的潜在作用:我们回顾性纳入了2018年1月至2021年12月期间在安贞医院成功接受CTO PCI的1482例非糖尿病患者。主要终点为主要不良心血管事件(MACE)。收集临床特征、生化指标和介入记录,并计算 eGDR 和 SII。采用 Cox 回归、限制性三次样条(RCS)、接收器操作特征(ROC)分析和 Kaplan-Meier 曲线评估相关性:158名患者(10.67%)发生了MACE。发生 MACE 的患者 eGDR 较低,SII 水平较高。高 eGDR 能明显降低 MACE 风险(Q4 vs. Q1:HR 0.06,95% CI 0.03-0.12),而高 SII 会增加 MACE 风险(Q4 vs. Q1:HR 3.32,95% CI 1.78-6.33)。低 eGDR 和高 SII 的组合可预测最高的 MACE 风险(HR 4.36,95% CI 2.71-6.01)。SII部分介导了eGDR与MACE之间的关系:结论:低eGDR和高SII是非糖尿病CTO PCI患者不良预后的重要预测因素。结合 eGDR 和 SII 可以进行综合评估,更好地预测心血管预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease
Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
381
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信