Parental perceptions and knowledge toward Asthma Action Plans.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 ALLERGY
Journal of Asthma Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-10 DOI:10.1080/02770903.2024.2408758
Ryan Mackle, Mei Chan, Monica Lay, Michael Purcell, Nicole Campbell, Adam Jaffe, Louisa Owens, Melinda Gray, Nusrat Homaira
{"title":"Parental perceptions and knowledge toward Asthma Action Plans.","authors":"Ryan Mackle, Mei Chan, Monica Lay, Michael Purcell, Nicole Campbell, Adam Jaffe, Louisa Owens, Melinda Gray, Nusrat Homaira","doi":"10.1080/02770903.2024.2408758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Personalized Asthma Action Plans (AAPs) are a cornerstone of pediatric asthma management. We aimed to assess parental knowledge and perceptions of the use of AAPs in managing their child's asthma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In 2023 we conducted a cross-sectional survey to assess knowledge and perceptions of AAPs in parents/caregivers of children aged 0-17 years with asthma who had an AAP and attended respiratory clinics at Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick. The questionnaire included parental perceptions on the utility of AAPs, parental asthma management self-efficacy (PAMSE), and an adapted version of the Asthma Action Plan Knowledge Interview tool (AAPKI). Descriptive statistics and regression analyses were used to assess associations between AAPKI, PAMSE and other outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-one parents completed the survey. Mean PAMSE score was 4.2/5 (SD 0.5). Median AAPKI score was 70.2% out of 100% (IQR 20.4%). Most parents (80.0%, <i>n</i> = 56) were satisfied/very satisfied with using AAPs to manage their child's asthma. Most agreed/strongly agreed that AAPs were helpful in knowing when to seek medical attention for their child's asthma (81.7%, <i>n</i> = 58), helped their understanding of asthma severity (81.7%, <i>n</i> = 58), and increased their confidence in asthma management (76.0%, <i>n</i> = 54). Over half of parents (55.7%, <i>n</i> = 39) would prefer AAPs digitally and majority (78.6%, <i>n</i> = 55) would like color-coded AAPs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>High levels of AAP knowledge and self-efficacy scores were demonstrated. Most parents expressed understanding of the benefits of AAPs. Our findings suggest parents of children with asthma prefer AAPs in color and in digital version which may help guide standardization of AAPs across Australia.</p>","PeriodicalId":15076,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asthma","volume":" ","pages":"435-444"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Asthma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02770903.2024.2408758","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Personalized Asthma Action Plans (AAPs) are a cornerstone of pediatric asthma management. We aimed to assess parental knowledge and perceptions of the use of AAPs in managing their child's asthma.

Methods: In 2023 we conducted a cross-sectional survey to assess knowledge and perceptions of AAPs in parents/caregivers of children aged 0-17 years with asthma who had an AAP and attended respiratory clinics at Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick. The questionnaire included parental perceptions on the utility of AAPs, parental asthma management self-efficacy (PAMSE), and an adapted version of the Asthma Action Plan Knowledge Interview tool (AAPKI). Descriptive statistics and regression analyses were used to assess associations between AAPKI, PAMSE and other outcomes.

Results: Seventy-one parents completed the survey. Mean PAMSE score was 4.2/5 (SD 0.5). Median AAPKI score was 70.2% out of 100% (IQR 20.4%). Most parents (80.0%, n = 56) were satisfied/very satisfied with using AAPs to manage their child's asthma. Most agreed/strongly agreed that AAPs were helpful in knowing when to seek medical attention for their child's asthma (81.7%, n = 58), helped their understanding of asthma severity (81.7%, n = 58), and increased their confidence in asthma management (76.0%, n = 54). Over half of parents (55.7%, n = 39) would prefer AAPs digitally and majority (78.6%, n = 55) would like color-coded AAPs.

Conclusion: High levels of AAP knowledge and self-efficacy scores were demonstrated. Most parents expressed understanding of the benefits of AAPs. Our findings suggest parents of children with asthma prefer AAPs in color and in digital version which may help guide standardization of AAPs across Australia.

家长对哮喘行动计划的看法和知识。
导言:个性化哮喘行动计划(AAPs)是儿科哮喘管理的基石。我们旨在评估家长对使用个性化哮喘行动计划管理其子女哮喘的了解和看法:2023 年,我们进行了一项横断面调查,以评估 0-17 岁哮喘患儿的父母/监护人对哮喘行动计划的了解和看法,这些患儿已制定了哮喘行动计划,并在兰德威克的悉尼儿童医院呼吸科门诊就诊。问卷内容包括家长对哮喘行动计划效用的看法、家长哮喘管理自我效能(PAMSE)以及哮喘行动计划知识访谈工具(AAPKI)的改编版。采用描述性统计和回归分析评估 AAPKI、PAMSE 和其他结果之间的关联:71名家长完成了调查。PAMSE 平均分为 4.2/5(SD 0.5)。AAPKI 评分中位数为 70.2%(满分 100 分,IQR 为 20.4%)。大多数家长(80.0%,n = 56)对使用 AAPs 控制孩子的哮喘表示满意/非常满意。大多数家长同意/非常同意 "哮喘辅助治疗方案 "有助于他们了解孩子的哮喘何时就医(81.7%,n = 58),有助于他们了解哮喘的严重程度(81.7%,n = 58),并增强了他们管理哮喘的信心(76.0%,n = 54)。超过半数的家长(55.7%,n = 39)希望获得数字版的哮喘辅助用药指南,大多数家长(78.6%,n = 55)希望获得彩色编码的哮喘辅助用药指南:结论:家长对儿童辅助器具的了解程度和自我效能得分都很高。大多数家长都表示了解适宜儿童用药的好处。我们的研究结果表明,哮喘儿童的家长更喜欢彩色和电子版的哮喘儿童行动计划,这可能有助于指导全澳大利亚哮喘儿童行动计划的标准化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Asthma
Journal of Asthma 医学-过敏
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
158
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Providing an authoritative open forum on asthma and related conditions, Journal of Asthma publishes clinical research around such topics as asthma management, critical and long-term care, preventative measures, environmental counselling, and patient education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信