Clients prefer collaborative decision-making with veterinarians regardless of appointment type.

IF 1.6 2区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Catherine N H Groves, Jason B Coe, Katja A Sutherland, Cathy Bauman, Lauren E Grant
{"title":"Clients prefer collaborative decision-making with veterinarians regardless of appointment type.","authors":"Catherine N H Groves, Jason B Coe, Katja A Sutherland, Cathy Bauman, Lauren E Grant","doi":"10.2460/javma.24.06.0421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine clients' preferences for veterinarians' communication during decision-making in relation to 3 clinical contexts: preventive care, general problem (eg, illness or injury), and urgent appointments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional online questionnaire was distributed by use of snowball sampling to veterinary clients owning a pet. Demographic information was collected, and participants were then randomly assigned to a scenario reflecting one of the following clinical contexts (appointment types): preventive, general problem, or urgent. Discrete choice exercises were used to solicit client preferences for 5 aspects of veterinarians' communication approach to decision-making with clients in clinical contexts: amount of information, presentation of plan (options or a recommendation), communication of value, nature of client involvement, and communication of financial cost. Relative-preference scores were calculated using hierarchical bayesian modeling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Responses for 1,614 participants were included in the final analysis. The majority were female, lived in Canada, and were financially stable. Across clinical decision-making contexts, participants preferred to collaborate with the veterinarian, be offered options with a clear recommendation, be informed of present and future costs, and have benefits of any action regarding their pet's health explained to them. For the general-problem context, participants preferred veterinarians' communication to focus solely on concerns; in contrast, in preventive care and urgent contexts, participants preferred that communication include both normal findings and concerns.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Irrespective of clinical decision-making context, participants preferred collaborative decision-making with a veterinarian.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Veterinary professionals should consider, when possible, communication that supports a collaborative approach to decision-making with clients.</p>","PeriodicalId":14658,"journal":{"name":"Javma-journal of The American Veterinary Medical Association","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Javma-journal of The American Veterinary Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.24.06.0421","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To determine clients' preferences for veterinarians' communication during decision-making in relation to 3 clinical contexts: preventive care, general problem (eg, illness or injury), and urgent appointments.

Methods: A cross-sectional online questionnaire was distributed by use of snowball sampling to veterinary clients owning a pet. Demographic information was collected, and participants were then randomly assigned to a scenario reflecting one of the following clinical contexts (appointment types): preventive, general problem, or urgent. Discrete choice exercises were used to solicit client preferences for 5 aspects of veterinarians' communication approach to decision-making with clients in clinical contexts: amount of information, presentation of plan (options or a recommendation), communication of value, nature of client involvement, and communication of financial cost. Relative-preference scores were calculated using hierarchical bayesian modeling.

Results: Responses for 1,614 participants were included in the final analysis. The majority were female, lived in Canada, and were financially stable. Across clinical decision-making contexts, participants preferred to collaborate with the veterinarian, be offered options with a clear recommendation, be informed of present and future costs, and have benefits of any action regarding their pet's health explained to them. For the general-problem context, participants preferred veterinarians' communication to focus solely on concerns; in contrast, in preventive care and urgent contexts, participants preferred that communication include both normal findings and concerns.

Conclusions: Irrespective of clinical decision-making context, participants preferred collaborative decision-making with a veterinarian.

Clinical relevance: Veterinary professionals should consider, when possible, communication that supports a collaborative approach to decision-making with clients.

无论预约类型如何,客户都更喜欢与兽医合作决策。
目的确定客户对兽医在决策过程中就三种临床情况进行沟通的偏好:预防性护理、一般问题(如疾病或受伤)和紧急预约:采用滚雪球抽样法向拥有宠物的兽医客户发放横向在线问卷。在收集了人口统计学信息后,参与者被随机分配到反映以下临床环境(预约类型)之一的情景中:预防性护理、一般问题或紧急预约。通过离散选择练习来征求客户对兽医在临床情境中与客户进行决策沟通的 5 个方面的偏好:信息量、计划介绍(选项或建议)、价值沟通、客户参与的性质以及财务成本沟通。采用分层贝叶斯模型计算相对偏好得分:最终分析包括 1,614 名参与者的回复。大部分参与者为女性,居住在加拿大,经济状况稳定。在不同的临床决策情境中,参与者更希望与兽医合作、获得有明确建议的选择方案、了解当前和未来的成本,以及获得对宠物健康采取任何行动的好处解释。在一般问题的情况下,参与者希望兽医的沟通只集中在关注的问题上;相比之下,在预防性护理和紧急状况的情况下,参与者希望沟通既包括正常的检查结果,也包括关注的问题:结论:无论在何种临床决策环境下,参与者都倾向于与兽医合作决策:临床相关性:兽医专业人员应尽可能考虑在与客户沟通时采用合作决策的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
15.80%
发文量
539
审稿时长
6-16 weeks
期刊介绍: Published twice monthly, this peer-reviewed, general scientific journal provides reports of clinical research, feature articles and regular columns of interest to veterinarians in private and public practice. The News and Classified Ad sections are posted online 10 days to two weeks before they are delivered in print.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信