Responsiveness of the Australian Spasticity Assessment Scale to botulinum neurotoxin injection into spastic wrist flexors after acquired brain injury.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 REHABILITATION
Korhan Bariş Bayram, İlker Şengül, Nazrin Aghazada, Ayhan Aşkin, Ferhan Elmali
{"title":"Responsiveness of the Australian Spasticity Assessment Scale to botulinum neurotoxin injection into spastic wrist flexors after acquired brain injury.","authors":"Korhan Bariş Bayram, İlker Şengül, Nazrin Aghazada, Ayhan Aşkin, Ferhan Elmali","doi":"10.1097/MRR.0000000000000644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Australian Spasticity Assessment Scale (ASAS) is a relatively new scale used to rate the severity of spasticity. Although the reliability of the ASAS has been investigated, its ability to detect a clinically important change (responsiveness) has not. The objective of this study was to investigate the responsiveness of the ASAS in adult patients with acquired brain injury-related wrist flexor spasticity treated with botulinum neurotoxin A. The responsiveness of the ASAS was assessed by the standardized response mean at the group level. At the individual level, responsiveness was assessed by the percentage of responders and nonresponders. Those who had at least a 1 grade reduction in spasticity severity were considered responders. In addition, the magnitude of the goniometric change in R1 (angle of catch response) across the responders and nonresponders was studied as a distribution of frequency. Significant improvements in R1 and ASAS were achieved with the treatment. The standardized response mean based on the ASAS grades was 1.50 with a 95% confidence interval of 1.16-1.89. At the individual level, 40 of all cases (78.4%) were responders, and 11 (21.6%) were nonresponders. Three of the 11 nonresponders (27.3%) improved R1 beyond the 10 ° margin of error (20, 50, and 50 °). In contrast, the percentage of responders who had a change within the margin of error was 27.5% (11 out of 40). Although ASAS can reveal a decrease in wrist flexor spasticity, it has some shortcomings in detecting the potentially clinically important response at the individual level.</p>","PeriodicalId":14301,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Rehabilitation Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Rehabilitation Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0000000000000644","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Australian Spasticity Assessment Scale (ASAS) is a relatively new scale used to rate the severity of spasticity. Although the reliability of the ASAS has been investigated, its ability to detect a clinically important change (responsiveness) has not. The objective of this study was to investigate the responsiveness of the ASAS in adult patients with acquired brain injury-related wrist flexor spasticity treated with botulinum neurotoxin A. The responsiveness of the ASAS was assessed by the standardized response mean at the group level. At the individual level, responsiveness was assessed by the percentage of responders and nonresponders. Those who had at least a 1 grade reduction in spasticity severity were considered responders. In addition, the magnitude of the goniometric change in R1 (angle of catch response) across the responders and nonresponders was studied as a distribution of frequency. Significant improvements in R1 and ASAS were achieved with the treatment. The standardized response mean based on the ASAS grades was 1.50 with a 95% confidence interval of 1.16-1.89. At the individual level, 40 of all cases (78.4%) were responders, and 11 (21.6%) were nonresponders. Three of the 11 nonresponders (27.3%) improved R1 beyond the 10 ° margin of error (20, 50, and 50 °). In contrast, the percentage of responders who had a change within the margin of error was 27.5% (11 out of 40). Although ASAS can reveal a decrease in wrist flexor spasticity, it has some shortcomings in detecting the potentially clinically important response at the individual level.

澳大利亚痉挛评估量表对后天性脑损伤后痉挛性腕屈肌注射肉毒杆菌神经毒素的反应。
澳大利亚痉挛评估量表(ASAS)是一种相对较新的量表,用于评定痉挛的严重程度。虽然已对 ASAS 的可靠性进行了研究,但尚未对其检测临床重要变化(反应性)的能力进行研究。本研究旨在调查接受肉毒杆菌神经毒素A治疗的后天性脑损伤相关腕屈肌痉挛成年患者对ASAS的反应性。在个人层面上,反应性通过有反应者和无反应者的百分比来评估。痉挛严重程度至少降低一个等级的患者被视为应答者。此外,还以频率分布的形式研究了有反应者和无反应者在 R1(捕捉反应角度)上的动态关节角度变化幅度。治疗后,R1 和 ASAS 均有明显改善。根据 ASAS 评分得出的标准化反应平均值为 1.50,95% 置信区间为 1.16-1.89。就个体而言,所有病例中有 40 例(78.4%)有反应,11 例(21.6%)无反应。在这 11 例无应答者中,有 3 例(27.3%)的 R1 改善幅度超过了 10 ° 的误差范围(20 °、50 ° 和 50 °)。相比之下,变化幅度在误差范围内的应答者比例为 27.5%(40 人中有 11 人)。虽然 ASAS 可以显示腕屈肌痉挛的减少,但在检测个体水平上具有潜在临床意义的反应方面存在一些缺陷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
88
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Rehabilitation Research is a quarterly, peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary forum for the publication of research into functioning, disability and contextual factors experienced by persons of all ages in both developed and developing societies. The wealth of information offered makes the journal a valuable resource for researchers, practitioners, and administrators in such fields as rehabilitation medicine, outcome measurement nursing, social and vocational rehabilitation/case management, return to work, special education, social policy, social work and social welfare, sociology, psychology, psychiatry assistive technology and environmental factors/disability. Areas of interest include functioning and disablement throughout the life cycle; rehabilitation programmes for persons with physical, sensory, mental and developmental disabilities; measurement of functioning and disability; special education and vocational rehabilitation; equipment access and transportation; information technology; independent living; consumer, legal, economic and sociopolitical aspects of functioning, disability and contextual factors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信