No substantial neurocognitive impact of COVID-19 across ages and disease severity: a multicenter biomarker study of SARS-CoV-2 positive and negative adult and pediatric patients with acute respiratory tract infections.

IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Johannes Ehler, Felix Klawitter, Friedrich von Möllendorff, Maike Zacharias, Dagmar-Christiane Fischer, Lena Danckert, Rika Bajorat, Johanna Hackenberg, Astrid Bertsche, Micha Loebermann, Hilte Geerdes-Fenge, Robert Fleischmann, Gerd Klinkmann, Patrick Schramm, Sarah Schober, Axel Petzold, Robert Perneczky, Thomas Saller
{"title":"No substantial neurocognitive impact of COVID-19 across ages and disease severity: a multicenter biomarker study of SARS-CoV-2 positive and negative adult and pediatric patients with acute respiratory tract infections.","authors":"Johannes Ehler, Felix Klawitter, Friedrich von Möllendorff, Maike Zacharias, Dagmar-Christiane Fischer, Lena Danckert, Rika Bajorat, Johanna Hackenberg, Astrid Bertsche, Micha Loebermann, Hilte Geerdes-Fenge, Robert Fleischmann, Gerd Klinkmann, Patrick Schramm, Sarah Schober, Axel Petzold, Robert Perneczky, Thomas Saller","doi":"10.1007/s15010-024-02406-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Compared to intensive care unit patients with SARS-CoV-2 negative acute respiratory tract infections, patients with SARS-CoV-2 are supposed to develop more frequently and more severely neurologic sequelae. Delirium and subsequent neurocognitive deficits (NCD) have implications for patients' morbidity and mortality. However, the extent of brain injury during acute COVID-19 and subsequent NCD still remain largely unexplored. Body-fluid biomarkers may offer valuable insights into the quantification of acute delirium, brain injury and may help to predict subsequent NCD following COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a multicenter, observational case-control study, conducted across four German University Hospitals, hospitalized adult and pediatric patients with an acute COVID-19 and SARS-CoV-2 negative controls presenting with acute respiratory tract infections were included. Study procedures comprised the assessment of pre-existing neurocognitive function, daily screening for delirium, neurological examination and blood sampling. Fourteen biomarkers indicative of neuroaxonal, glial, neurovascular injury and inflammation were analyzed. Neurocognitive functions were re-evaluated after three months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We enrolled 118 participants (90 adults, 28 children). The incidence of delirium [85 out of 90 patients (94.4%) were assessable for delirium) was comparable between patients with COVID-19 [16 out of 61 patients (26.2%)] and SARS-CoV-2 negative controls [8 out of 24 patients (33.3%); p > 0.05] across adults and children. No differences in outcomes as measured by the modified Rankin Scale, the Short-Blessed Test, the Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly, and the pediatrics cerebral performance category scale were observed after three months. Levels of body-fluid biomarkers were generally elevated in both adult and pediatric cohorts, without significant differences between SARS-CoV-2 negative controls and COVID-19. In COVID-19 patients experiencing delirium, levels of GFAP and MMP-9 were significantly higher compared to those without delirium.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Delirium and subsequent NCD are not more frequent in COVID-19 as compared to SARS-CoV-2 negative patients with acute respiratory tract infections. Consistently, biomarker levels of brain injury indicated no differences between COVID-19 cases and SARS-CoV-2 negative controls. Our data suggest that delirium in COVID-19 does not distinctly trigger substantial and persistent subsequent NCD compared to patients with other acute respiratory tract infections.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04359914; date of registration 24-APR 2020.</p>","PeriodicalId":13600,"journal":{"name":"Infection","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-024-02406-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Compared to intensive care unit patients with SARS-CoV-2 negative acute respiratory tract infections, patients with SARS-CoV-2 are supposed to develop more frequently and more severely neurologic sequelae. Delirium and subsequent neurocognitive deficits (NCD) have implications for patients' morbidity and mortality. However, the extent of brain injury during acute COVID-19 and subsequent NCD still remain largely unexplored. Body-fluid biomarkers may offer valuable insights into the quantification of acute delirium, brain injury and may help to predict subsequent NCD following COVID-19.

Methods: In a multicenter, observational case-control study, conducted across four German University Hospitals, hospitalized adult and pediatric patients with an acute COVID-19 and SARS-CoV-2 negative controls presenting with acute respiratory tract infections were included. Study procedures comprised the assessment of pre-existing neurocognitive function, daily screening for delirium, neurological examination and blood sampling. Fourteen biomarkers indicative of neuroaxonal, glial, neurovascular injury and inflammation were analyzed. Neurocognitive functions were re-evaluated after three months.

Results: We enrolled 118 participants (90 adults, 28 children). The incidence of delirium [85 out of 90 patients (94.4%) were assessable for delirium) was comparable between patients with COVID-19 [16 out of 61 patients (26.2%)] and SARS-CoV-2 negative controls [8 out of 24 patients (33.3%); p > 0.05] across adults and children. No differences in outcomes as measured by the modified Rankin Scale, the Short-Blessed Test, the Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly, and the pediatrics cerebral performance category scale were observed after three months. Levels of body-fluid biomarkers were generally elevated in both adult and pediatric cohorts, without significant differences between SARS-CoV-2 negative controls and COVID-19. In COVID-19 patients experiencing delirium, levels of GFAP and MMP-9 were significantly higher compared to those without delirium.

Conclusions: Delirium and subsequent NCD are not more frequent in COVID-19 as compared to SARS-CoV-2 negative patients with acute respiratory tract infections. Consistently, biomarker levels of brain injury indicated no differences between COVID-19 cases and SARS-CoV-2 negative controls. Our data suggest that delirium in COVID-19 does not distinctly trigger substantial and persistent subsequent NCD compared to patients with other acute respiratory tract infections.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04359914; date of registration 24-APR 2020.

COVID-19对不同年龄和疾病严重程度的神经认知没有实质性影响:一项针对SARS-CoV-2阳性和阴性成人及儿童急性呼吸道感染患者的多中心生物标记物研究。
背景:与 SARS-CoV-2 阴性急性呼吸道感染的重症监护病房患者相比,SARS-CoV-2 患者应该会更频繁、更严重地出现神经系统后遗症。谵妄和随后的神经认知障碍(NCD)对患者的发病率和死亡率都有影响。然而,急性 COVID-19 期间的脑损伤程度以及随后的 NCD 在很大程度上仍未得到研究。体液生物标志物可为量化急性谵妄、脑损伤提供有价值的见解,并有助于预测 COVID-19 之后的 NCD:在德国四所大学医院开展的一项多中心病例对照观察研究中,纳入了急性 COVID-19 的住院成人和儿童患者,以及 SARS-CoV-2 阴性对照组急性呼吸道感染患者。研究程序包括评估原有的神经认知功能、每日谵妄筛查、神经系统检查和血液采样。研究分析了表明神经轴突、神经胶质、神经血管损伤和炎症的 14 种生物标记物。三个月后重新评估神经认知功能:我们共招募了 118 名参与者(90 名成人,28 名儿童)。在成人和儿童中,COVID-19 患者的谵妄发生率[90 名患者中有 85 名(94.4%)可评估谵妄][61 名患者中有 16 名(26.2%)]与 SARS-CoV-2 阴性对照组[24 名患者中有 8 名(33.3%);P > 0.05]相当。三个月后,通过改良兰金量表、短福测试、老年人认知功能衰退信息问卷和儿科脑功能分类量表测量的结果未发现差异。成人和儿童群体的体液生物标志物水平普遍升高,SARS-CoV-2 阴性对照组和 COVID-19 之间没有明显差异。在出现谵妄的 COVID-19 患者中,GFAP 和 MMP-9 的水平明显高于未出现谵妄的患者:结论:与 SARS-CoV-2 阴性的急性呼吸道感染患者相比,COVID-19 患者的谵妄和随后的非传染性疾病发生率并不高。同样,脑损伤的生物标志物水平在 COVID-19 病例和 SARS-CoV-2 阴性对照组之间没有差异。我们的数据表明,与其他急性呼吸道感染患者相比,COVID-19患者的谵妄并不会明显引发严重和持续的后续非传染性疾病:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT04359914;注册日期:2020年4月24日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Infection
Infection 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
1.30%
发文量
224
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Infection is a journal dedicated to serving as a global forum for the presentation and discussion of clinically relevant information on infectious diseases. Its primary goal is to engage readers and contributors from various regions around the world in the exchange of knowledge about the etiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of infectious diseases, both in outpatient and inpatient settings. The journal covers a wide range of topics, including: Etiology: The study of the causes of infectious diseases. Pathogenesis: The process by which an infectious agent causes disease. Diagnosis: The methods and techniques used to identify infectious diseases. Treatment: The medical interventions and strategies employed to treat infectious diseases. Public Health: Issues of local, regional, or international significance related to infectious diseases, including prevention, control, and management strategies. Hospital Epidemiology: The study of the spread of infectious diseases within healthcare settings and the measures to prevent nosocomial infections. In addition to these, Infection also includes a specialized "Images" section, which focuses on high-quality visual content, such as images, photographs, and microscopic slides, accompanied by brief abstracts. This section is designed to highlight the clinical and diagnostic value of visual aids in the field of infectious diseases, as many conditions present with characteristic clinical signs that can be diagnosed through inspection, and imaging and microscopy are crucial for accurate diagnosis. The journal's comprehensive approach ensures that it remains a valuable resource for healthcare professionals and researchers in the field of infectious diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信