A cost-minimization analysis of anti-VEGFs for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration in the Netherlands.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Sara W Quist, Hidde Nab, Maarten Postma, Sankha Amarakoon, Freekje van Asten, Roel Freriks
{"title":"A cost-minimization analysis of anti-VEGFs for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration in the Netherlands.","authors":"Sara W Quist, Hidde Nab, Maarten Postma, Sankha Amarakoon, Freekje van Asten, Roel Freriks","doi":"10.1007/s00417-024-06588-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the main cause of severe vision loss globally. Neovascular AMD (nAMD) is an advanced stage of AMD treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factors (anti-VEGFs). Although anti-VEGF treatment is effective, the frequent intravitreal injections place a burden on patients, (in)formal caregivers, and clinics. This study assesses the health-economic impact of anti-VEGF agents with lower injection frequency that have the potential to reduce treatment burden and compares it to the standard of care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed a cost-minimization model to evaluate the direct medical costs associated with first-line unilateral anti-VEGF treatment across a 3-year time horizon in the Netherlands. The analysis compared aflibercept 8 mg, aflibercept 2 mg, bevacizumab, faricimab, and ranibizumab. Our model adopted a treat-and-extend (T&E) regimen for aflibercept 2 mg, bevacizumab, and ranibizumab. For aflibercept 8 mg, a flexible regimen that was extendable up to 24 weeks was applied, while faricimab followed a flexible regimen that was extendable up to 16 weeks. Additionally, since list prices may vary from net prices, we calculated the break-even price for each anti-VEGF in comparison to bevacizumab, which is the recommended first-line treatment due to its low medication price.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on list prices, aflibercept 8 mg led to the lowest treatment costs (€16,251 per patient over a 3-year time horizon), closely followed by bevacizumab (€17,616 per patient over a 3-year time horizon). Ranibizumab led to the highest per-patient costs (€31,746 over a 3-year time horizon). For bevacizumab, most costs were attributable to administration, while for the other anti-VEGFs, most were attributable to medication. Aflibercept 8 mg is cost-saving compared to bevacizumab at their medication prices at the time of writing. Aflibercept 2 mg, faricimab, and ranibizumab should be priced below €488, €591, and €75, respectively. To be cost-equal to bevacizumab with current list prices, anti-VEGFs should be administered with a maximum of 12.7 to 13.8 injections over a 3-year time horizon.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>According to the injection frequency observed in clinical trials, aflibercept 8 mg would be the anti-VEGF that generates the lowest per-patient healthcare costs for the treatment of nAMD in the Netherlands after a treatment period of three years. Our study indicates that anti-VEGF drugs with a lower injection frequency might provide a cost-saving solution to the increasing burden of anti-VEGF treatment on the healthcare system.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-024-06588-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the main cause of severe vision loss globally. Neovascular AMD (nAMD) is an advanced stage of AMD treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factors (anti-VEGFs). Although anti-VEGF treatment is effective, the frequent intravitreal injections place a burden on patients, (in)formal caregivers, and clinics. This study assesses the health-economic impact of anti-VEGF agents with lower injection frequency that have the potential to reduce treatment burden and compares it to the standard of care.

Methods: We developed a cost-minimization model to evaluate the direct medical costs associated with first-line unilateral anti-VEGF treatment across a 3-year time horizon in the Netherlands. The analysis compared aflibercept 8 mg, aflibercept 2 mg, bevacizumab, faricimab, and ranibizumab. Our model adopted a treat-and-extend (T&E) regimen for aflibercept 2 mg, bevacizumab, and ranibizumab. For aflibercept 8 mg, a flexible regimen that was extendable up to 24 weeks was applied, while faricimab followed a flexible regimen that was extendable up to 16 weeks. Additionally, since list prices may vary from net prices, we calculated the break-even price for each anti-VEGF in comparison to bevacizumab, which is the recommended first-line treatment due to its low medication price.

Results: Based on list prices, aflibercept 8 mg led to the lowest treatment costs (€16,251 per patient over a 3-year time horizon), closely followed by bevacizumab (€17,616 per patient over a 3-year time horizon). Ranibizumab led to the highest per-patient costs (€31,746 over a 3-year time horizon). For bevacizumab, most costs were attributable to administration, while for the other anti-VEGFs, most were attributable to medication. Aflibercept 8 mg is cost-saving compared to bevacizumab at their medication prices at the time of writing. Aflibercept 2 mg, faricimab, and ranibizumab should be priced below €488, €591, and €75, respectively. To be cost-equal to bevacizumab with current list prices, anti-VEGFs should be administered with a maximum of 12.7 to 13.8 injections over a 3-year time horizon.

Conclusion: According to the injection frequency observed in clinical trials, aflibercept 8 mg would be the anti-VEGF that generates the lowest per-patient healthcare costs for the treatment of nAMD in the Netherlands after a treatment period of three years. Our study indicates that anti-VEGF drugs with a lower injection frequency might provide a cost-saving solution to the increasing burden of anti-VEGF treatment on the healthcare system.

荷兰抗血管内皮生长因子用于治疗新生血管性老年黄斑变性的成本最小化分析。
目的:老年性黄斑变性(AMD)是全球视力严重下降的主要原因。新生血管性黄斑变性(nAMD)是抗血管内皮生长因子(anti-VEGFs)治疗黄斑变性的晚期阶段。虽然抗血管内皮生长因子治疗有效,但频繁的玻璃体内注射给患者、(非)正式护理人员和诊所带来了负担。本研究评估了注射频率较低且有可能减轻治疗负担的抗血管内皮生长因子药物对健康经济的影响,并将其与标准护理进行了比较:我们建立了一个成本最小化模型,以评估荷兰一线单侧抗血管内皮生长因子治疗在 3 年时间跨度内的直接医疗成本。分析比较了阿弗利百普 8 毫克、阿弗利百普 2 毫克、贝伐珠单抗、法利单抗和雷尼珠单抗。我们的模型对阿弗利百普 2 毫克、贝伐珠单抗和雷尼珠单抗采用了治疗和延长(T&E)方案。对于阿弗利百普 8 毫克,我们采用了可延长至 24 周的灵活治疗方案,而法尼单抗则采用了可延长至 16 周的灵活治疗方案。此外,由于上市价格可能与净价格不同,我们计算了每种抗血管内皮生长因子的盈亏平衡价格与贝伐珠单抗的比较,贝伐珠单抗因其低廉的药价而被推荐为一线治疗药物:根据清单价格,阿夫利拜因 8 毫克的治疗成本最低(3 年内每名患者 16,251 欧元),贝伐珠单抗紧随其后(3 年内每名患者 17,616 欧元)。拉尼珠单抗的人均治疗成本最高(3 年期 31,746 欧元)。贝伐珠单抗的大部分成本来自于管理,而其他抗血管内皮生长因子的大部分成本来自于药物。与贝伐珠单抗相比,按本文撰写时的药价计算,Aflibercept 8 毫克可节省成本。Aflibercept 2 毫克、法利西单抗和雷尼珠单抗的价格应分别低于 488 欧元、591 欧元和 75 欧元。以目前的上市价格计算,抗血管内皮生长因子药物的成本效益应与贝伐珠单抗相当,3 年内最多应注射 12.7 至 13.8 次:根据临床试验中观察到的注射频率,阿弗利百普(aflibercept)8 毫克将是荷兰治疗 nAMD 的抗血管内皮生长因子药物,在三年治疗期后,每位患者的医疗成本最低。我们的研究表明,注射频率较低的抗血管内皮生长因子药物可为医疗系统提供一种节约成本的解决方案,以解决抗血管内皮生长因子治疗给医疗系统带来的日益沉重的负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信