Sara W Quist, Hidde Nab, Maarten Postma, Sankha Amarakoon, Freekje van Asten, Roel Freriks
{"title":"A cost-minimization analysis of anti-VEGFs for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration in the Netherlands.","authors":"Sara W Quist, Hidde Nab, Maarten Postma, Sankha Amarakoon, Freekje van Asten, Roel Freriks","doi":"10.1007/s00417-024-06588-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the main cause of severe vision loss globally. Neovascular AMD (nAMD) is an advanced stage of AMD treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factors (anti-VEGFs). Although anti-VEGF treatment is effective, the frequent intravitreal injections place a burden on patients, (in)formal caregivers, and clinics. This study assesses the health-economic impact of anti-VEGF agents with lower injection frequency that have the potential to reduce treatment burden and compares it to the standard of care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed a cost-minimization model to evaluate the direct medical costs associated with first-line unilateral anti-VEGF treatment across a 3-year time horizon in the Netherlands. The analysis compared aflibercept 8 mg, aflibercept 2 mg, bevacizumab, faricimab, and ranibizumab. Our model adopted a treat-and-extend (T&E) regimen for aflibercept 2 mg, bevacizumab, and ranibizumab. For aflibercept 8 mg, a flexible regimen that was extendable up to 24 weeks was applied, while faricimab followed a flexible regimen that was extendable up to 16 weeks. Additionally, since list prices may vary from net prices, we calculated the break-even price for each anti-VEGF in comparison to bevacizumab, which is the recommended first-line treatment due to its low medication price.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on list prices, aflibercept 8 mg led to the lowest treatment costs (€16,251 per patient over a 3-year time horizon), closely followed by bevacizumab (€17,616 per patient over a 3-year time horizon). Ranibizumab led to the highest per-patient costs (€31,746 over a 3-year time horizon). For bevacizumab, most costs were attributable to administration, while for the other anti-VEGFs, most were attributable to medication. Aflibercept 8 mg is cost-saving compared to bevacizumab at their medication prices at the time of writing. Aflibercept 2 mg, faricimab, and ranibizumab should be priced below €488, €591, and €75, respectively. To be cost-equal to bevacizumab with current list prices, anti-VEGFs should be administered with a maximum of 12.7 to 13.8 injections over a 3-year time horizon.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>According to the injection frequency observed in clinical trials, aflibercept 8 mg would be the anti-VEGF that generates the lowest per-patient healthcare costs for the treatment of nAMD in the Netherlands after a treatment period of three years. Our study indicates that anti-VEGF drugs with a lower injection frequency might provide a cost-saving solution to the increasing burden of anti-VEGF treatment on the healthcare system.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-024-06588-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the main cause of severe vision loss globally. Neovascular AMD (nAMD) is an advanced stage of AMD treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factors (anti-VEGFs). Although anti-VEGF treatment is effective, the frequent intravitreal injections place a burden on patients, (in)formal caregivers, and clinics. This study assesses the health-economic impact of anti-VEGF agents with lower injection frequency that have the potential to reduce treatment burden and compares it to the standard of care.
Methods: We developed a cost-minimization model to evaluate the direct medical costs associated with first-line unilateral anti-VEGF treatment across a 3-year time horizon in the Netherlands. The analysis compared aflibercept 8 mg, aflibercept 2 mg, bevacizumab, faricimab, and ranibizumab. Our model adopted a treat-and-extend (T&E) regimen for aflibercept 2 mg, bevacizumab, and ranibizumab. For aflibercept 8 mg, a flexible regimen that was extendable up to 24 weeks was applied, while faricimab followed a flexible regimen that was extendable up to 16 weeks. Additionally, since list prices may vary from net prices, we calculated the break-even price for each anti-VEGF in comparison to bevacizumab, which is the recommended first-line treatment due to its low medication price.
Results: Based on list prices, aflibercept 8 mg led to the lowest treatment costs (€16,251 per patient over a 3-year time horizon), closely followed by bevacizumab (€17,616 per patient over a 3-year time horizon). Ranibizumab led to the highest per-patient costs (€31,746 over a 3-year time horizon). For bevacizumab, most costs were attributable to administration, while for the other anti-VEGFs, most were attributable to medication. Aflibercept 8 mg is cost-saving compared to bevacizumab at their medication prices at the time of writing. Aflibercept 2 mg, faricimab, and ranibizumab should be priced below €488, €591, and €75, respectively. To be cost-equal to bevacizumab with current list prices, anti-VEGFs should be administered with a maximum of 12.7 to 13.8 injections over a 3-year time horizon.
Conclusion: According to the injection frequency observed in clinical trials, aflibercept 8 mg would be the anti-VEGF that generates the lowest per-patient healthcare costs for the treatment of nAMD in the Netherlands after a treatment period of three years. Our study indicates that anti-VEGF drugs with a lower injection frequency might provide a cost-saving solution to the increasing burden of anti-VEGF treatment on the healthcare system.