Optimal visual gaze pattern of endoscopists for improving adenoma detection during colonoscopy (with video)

IF 6.7 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Mizuki Nagai MD , Fumiaki Ishibashi MD, PhD , Kosuke Okusa DrEng , Kentaro Mochida MD , Eri Ozaki MD, PhD , Tetsuo Morishita MD, PhD , Sho Suzuki MD, PhD
{"title":"Optimal visual gaze pattern of endoscopists for improving adenoma detection during colonoscopy (with video)","authors":"Mizuki Nagai MD ,&nbsp;Fumiaki Ishibashi MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Kosuke Okusa DrEng ,&nbsp;Kentaro Mochida MD ,&nbsp;Eri Ozaki MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Tetsuo Morishita MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Sho Suzuki MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.gie.2024.09.028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Aims</h3><div>Visual gaze pattern (VGP) analysis quantifies endoscopists’ specific eye movements. VGP during colonoscopy may be associated with polyp detection. However, the optimal VGP to maximize detection performance remains unclear. This study evaluated the optimal endoscopic VGP that enabled the highest colorectal adenoma detection rate.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This randomized controlled trial was conducted between July and December 2023. We developed an eye-tracking and feedback (ETF) system that instructed endoscopists to correct their gaze toward the periphery of an endoscope screen with an audible alert. Patients who underwent colonoscopy were randomly assigned to 4 groups: 3 intervention groups, in which the endoscopist’s gaze was instructed to a different level of the peripheral screen area using the ETF system (the periphery of 4 × 4, 5 × 5, and 6 × 6 divisions of the screen), and a control group in which the endoscopist did not receive instructions. The primary outcome was the number of adenomas detected per colonoscopy (APC).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In total, 189 patients were enrolled. The APC and adenoma detection rate were significantly higher in the 6 × 6 group than in the control group (1.82 ± 2.41 vs 0.59 ± 1.17, <em>P</em> = .002; 68.9% vs 30.8%, <em>P</em> = .002). The APC and the number of screen divisions were positively correlated (<em>R</em> = 0.985, <em>P</em> = .0152). The rate at which the endoscopist gazed at the periphery of the screen was positively correlated with the number of divisions (<em>R</em> = 0.964, <em>P</em> = .0363).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Colorectal adenoma detection was improved by correcting the endoscopist’s gaze to the periphery of the screen, especially by dividing the screen into 6 × 6 segments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12542,"journal":{"name":"Gastrointestinal endoscopy","volume":"101 3","pages":"Pages 639-646.e3"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastrointestinal endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016510724035107","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aims

Visual gaze pattern (VGP) analysis quantifies endoscopists’ specific eye movements. VGP during colonoscopy may be associated with polyp detection. However, the optimal VGP to maximize detection performance remains unclear. This study evaluated the optimal endoscopic VGP that enabled the highest colorectal adenoma detection rate.

Methods

This randomized controlled trial was conducted between July and December 2023. We developed an eye-tracking and feedback (ETF) system that instructed endoscopists to correct their gaze toward the periphery of an endoscope screen with an audible alert. Patients who underwent colonoscopy were randomly assigned to 4 groups: 3 intervention groups, in which the endoscopist’s gaze was instructed to a different level of the peripheral screen area using the ETF system (the periphery of 4 × 4, 5 × 5, and 6 × 6 divisions of the screen), and a control group in which the endoscopist did not receive instructions. The primary outcome was the number of adenomas detected per colonoscopy (APC).

Results

In total, 189 patients were enrolled. The APC and adenoma detection rate were significantly higher in the 6 × 6 group than in the control group (1.82 ± 2.41 vs 0.59 ± 1.17, P = .002; 68.9% vs 30.8%, P = .002). The APC and the number of screen divisions were positively correlated (R = 0.985, P = .0152). The rate at which the endoscopist gazed at the periphery of the screen was positively correlated with the number of divisions (R = 0.964, P = .0363).

Conclusions

Colorectal adenoma detection was improved by correcting the endoscopist’s gaze to the periphery of the screen, especially by dividing the screen into 6 × 6 segments.

Abstract Image

提高结肠镜检查腺瘤检出率的最佳内镜医师视觉注视模式。
背景和目的:视觉注视模式(VGP)分析可量化内镜医师的特定眼球运动。结肠镜检查过程中的视觉注视模式可能与息肉检测有关。然而,使检测效果最大化的最佳 VGP 仍不明确。本研究评估了能使大肠腺瘤检出率最高的最佳内镜 VGP:这项随机对照试验于 2023 年 7 月至 12 月进行。我们开发了一种眼动跟踪和反馈(ETF)系统,指导内镜医师将视线转向内镜屏幕的外围,并发出声音提示。接受结肠镜检查的患者被随机分配到四个组:三个干预组,其中内镜医师的视线通过 ETF 系统被指示到屏幕外围区域的不同水平(屏幕 4×4 、5×5 和 6×6 分区的外围);一个对照组,其中内镜医师没有接受指示。主要结果是每次结肠镜检查发现的腺瘤数量(APC):结果:共有 189 名患者接受了检查。6×6组的APC和腺瘤检出率明显高于对照组(1.82±2.41 vs. 0.59±1.17,P=0.002;68.9% vs. 30.8%,P=0.002)。APC 与筛分次数呈正相关(R=0.985,P=0.0152)。内镜医师注视屏幕外围的比率与屏幕分割数呈正相关(R=0.964,P=0.0363):结论:通过纠正内镜医师对屏幕外围的注视,尤其是将屏幕划分为 6×6 段,可提高大肠腺瘤的检测率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gastrointestinal endoscopy
Gastrointestinal endoscopy 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
7.80%
发文量
1441
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy is a journal publishing original, peer-reviewed articles on endoscopic procedures for studying, diagnosing, and treating digestive diseases. It covers outcomes research, prospective studies, and controlled trials of new endoscopic instruments and treatment methods. The online features include full-text articles, video and audio clips, and MEDLINE links. The journal serves as an international forum for the latest developments in the specialty, offering challenging reports from authorities worldwide. It also publishes abstracts of significant articles from other clinical publications, accompanied by expert commentaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信