What can I do for my low back pain? The Work In Progress questionnaire!

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Marco Monticone, Federico Arippa, Roberto Garri, Andrea Pibiri, Maicol Formentelli, Barbara Rocca
{"title":"What can I do for my low back pain? The Work In Progress questionnaire!","authors":"Marco Monticone, Federico Arippa, Roberto Garri, Andrea Pibiri, Maicol Formentelli, Barbara Rocca","doi":"10.23736/S1973-9087.24.08572-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is growing evidence on Commitment Therapy for people with low back pain (LBP). A self-reported questionnaire is lacking which evaluates commitment by relying on the most recommended actions, the most important core outcome domains, and the most evidenced treatment options.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To describe the development and psychometric validation of the Work In Progress (WIP) questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Development and psychometric validation of the WIP questionnaire in the context of people with LBP, as a means to evaluate Commitment.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Outpatient facilities.</p><p><strong>Population: </strong>People with LBP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The new instrument was created by item generation and selection. Face validity, appropriateness, acceptability and feasibility were investigated. Psychometric testing was carried out in a cross-sectional study and included: 1) exploratory factor analysis; 2) reliability by internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) and test-retest measurement (Intra-class Correlation Coefficient, ICC<inf>2.1</inf>); and 3) construct validity by hypothesis testing the correlation of the WIP questionnaire with the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and a pain intensity Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) (Pearson's r correlations).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The WIP questionnaire was successfully developed based on international guidelines and the testing of face validity, appropriateness, acceptability and feasibility were satisfactory. The instrument was administered to 102 people with LBP (39 females, mean age of 49.7±14.6 years [range 20-80], pain median duration of 42.1 weeks [range 3-360]). Factor analysis revealed a two-factor 10-item solution (57% of explained variance). The internal consistency was good (α=0.70-85) and test-retest assessment was excellent (ICC<inf>2.1</inf>=0.91-94). Construct validity was good, as ≥75% of hypotheses were confirmed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The WIP questionnaire is a self-reported tool to evaluate commitment in persons with LBP showing satisfactory psychometric properties. It can be recommended for clinical and research purposes.</p><p><strong>Clinical rehabilitation impact: </strong>This study adds original new data to the existing knowledge in the field of Commitment within the bio-psychosocial paradigm for disabled people. It is expected to contribute to the evaluative, clinical and rehabilitative approach of individuals with low back pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":12044,"journal":{"name":"European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.24.08572-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is growing evidence on Commitment Therapy for people with low back pain (LBP). A self-reported questionnaire is lacking which evaluates commitment by relying on the most recommended actions, the most important core outcome domains, and the most evidenced treatment options.

Aim: To describe the development and psychometric validation of the Work In Progress (WIP) questionnaire.

Design: Development and psychometric validation of the WIP questionnaire in the context of people with LBP, as a means to evaluate Commitment.

Setting: Outpatient facilities.

Population: People with LBP.

Methods: The new instrument was created by item generation and selection. Face validity, appropriateness, acceptability and feasibility were investigated. Psychometric testing was carried out in a cross-sectional study and included: 1) exploratory factor analysis; 2) reliability by internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) and test-retest measurement (Intra-class Correlation Coefficient, ICC2.1); and 3) construct validity by hypothesis testing the correlation of the WIP questionnaire with the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and a pain intensity Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) (Pearson's r correlations).

Results: The WIP questionnaire was successfully developed based on international guidelines and the testing of face validity, appropriateness, acceptability and feasibility were satisfactory. The instrument was administered to 102 people with LBP (39 females, mean age of 49.7±14.6 years [range 20-80], pain median duration of 42.1 weeks [range 3-360]). Factor analysis revealed a two-factor 10-item solution (57% of explained variance). The internal consistency was good (α=0.70-85) and test-retest assessment was excellent (ICC2.1=0.91-94). Construct validity was good, as ≥75% of hypotheses were confirmed.

Conclusions: The WIP questionnaire is a self-reported tool to evaluate commitment in persons with LBP showing satisfactory psychometric properties. It can be recommended for clinical and research purposes.

Clinical rehabilitation impact: This study adds original new data to the existing knowledge in the field of Commitment within the bio-psychosocial paradigm for disabled people. It is expected to contribute to the evaluative, clinical and rehabilitative approach of individuals with low back pain.

我该如何治疗腰痛?工作进展问卷
背景:越来越多的证据表明,承诺疗法适用于腰背痛患者。目的:描述 "工作进展"(WIP)问卷的开发和心理测量验证:设计:在腰椎间盘突出症患者的背景下开发 WIP 问卷并进行心理测试验证,以此作为评估 "承诺 "的一种手段:人群:枸杞多糖症患者:人群:枸杞多糖症患者:方法:通过项目生成和选择创建新工具。对表面效度、适当性、可接受性和可行性进行了调查。心理测试在一项横断面研究中进行,包括1) 探索性因子分析;2) 通过内部一致性(Cronbach's alpha)和重测(类内相关系数,ICC2.1)进行可靠性测试;3) 通过假设检验 WIP 问卷与疼痛灾难化量表(PCS)、Oswestry 残疾指数(ODI)和疼痛强度数字评定量表(NRS)的相关性(Pearson's r 相关性)进行建构效度测试:根据国际指南成功编制了 WIP 问卷,其面效度、适当性、可接受性和可行性测试结果令人满意。对 102 名腰椎间盘突出症患者(39 名女性,平均年龄(49.7±14.6)岁[20-80 岁],疼痛持续时间中位数为 42.1 周[3-360 周])进行了问卷调查。因子分析显示了一个由 10 个项目组成的双因子解决方案(占解释方差的 57%)。内部一致性良好(α=0.70-85),重复测试评估结果极佳(ICC2.1=0.91-94)。结构效度良好,≥75%的假设得到证实:WIP问卷是评估腰椎间盘突出症患者承诺的自我报告工具,其心理测量学特性令人满意。结论:WIP 问卷是评估腰椎间盘突出症患者承诺的自我报告工具,其心理测量学特性令人满意,可推荐用于临床和研究目的:临床康复影响:这项研究为残疾人生物-心理-社会范式中承诺领域的现有知识增添了新的原始数据。它有望为腰背痛患者的评估、临床和康复方法做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
4.40%
发文量
162
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine publishes papers of clinical interest in physical and rehabilitation medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信