Hepatic vein Doppler ultrasound to estimate central venous pressure in mechanically ventilated children.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
European Journal of Pediatrics Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-26 DOI:10.1007/s00431-024-05792-0
Nayara Hillebrand Franzon, Lívia da Silva Krzesinski, Victoria Carneiro Lintz, Isabel de Siqueira Ferraz, Ana Paula Damiano, Roberto José Negrão Nogueira, Tiago Henrique De Souza
{"title":"Hepatic vein Doppler ultrasound to estimate central venous pressure in mechanically ventilated children.","authors":"Nayara Hillebrand Franzon, Lívia da Silva Krzesinski, Victoria Carneiro Lintz, Isabel de Siqueira Ferraz, Ana Paula Damiano, Roberto José Negrão Nogueira, Tiago Henrique De Souza","doi":"10.1007/s00431-024-05792-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Monitoring central venous pressure (CVP) is crucial for managing critically ill patients yet poses challenges in pediatric cases. This study aimed to correlate CVP with hepatic vein Doppler and IVC ultrasound variables in children. Mechanically ventilated children underwent simultaneous ultrasound and CVP measurements. Hepatic vein Doppler assessed peak velocities (A, S, V, D) and systolic filling fraction. IVC ultrasound included respiratory variability indices, IVC/aorta ratio, and IVC/body surface area ratio. Fifty-three children were included (median age of 8.3 months and weight of 6.3 kg). Significant correlations were found between CVP values and all hepatic vein Doppler-based variables. The strongest correlation was found between CVP and the sum of the absolute values of the A- and D-wave peak velocities (AD velocity), with a ρ = 0.61 (95% confidence interval [CI] of 0.40 to 0.75; p < 0.001). The AD velocity > 38.55 cm/s was able to discriminate patients with CPV > 12 mmHg with a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 95.3%, positive predictive value of 83.3%, and negative predictive value of 100%. No correlations were observed between CVP and variables derived from IVC respiratory variability indices or the IVC/aorta ratio. Conclusion: Hepatic vein Doppler ultrasound provides variables that significantly correlate with CVP and may be useful for estimating cardiac preload in mechanically ventilated children. Indices derived from IVC ultrasound were not reliable for estimating CVP. What is known? • Increased central venous pressure (CVP) can cause interstitial edema and reduce vital organ perfusion, leading to organic dysfunctions, with encapsulated organs such as the kidneys and liver being at higher risk. • However, measuring CVP in children poses challenges due to the difficulties and risks of central venous catheterization, frequent partial or total luminal obstructions in venous catheters, and potential technical errors in measurements. What is new? • Variables obtained through hepatic vein Doppler ultrasonography outperformed those obtained by inferior vena cava ultrasound for estimating CVP in this population. • Hepatic vein Doppler ultrasonography holds potential as an accurate, safe, and non-invasive method for discriminating patients with increased cardiac preload.</p>","PeriodicalId":11997,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"5139-5147"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-024-05792-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Monitoring central venous pressure (CVP) is crucial for managing critically ill patients yet poses challenges in pediatric cases. This study aimed to correlate CVP with hepatic vein Doppler and IVC ultrasound variables in children. Mechanically ventilated children underwent simultaneous ultrasound and CVP measurements. Hepatic vein Doppler assessed peak velocities (A, S, V, D) and systolic filling fraction. IVC ultrasound included respiratory variability indices, IVC/aorta ratio, and IVC/body surface area ratio. Fifty-three children were included (median age of 8.3 months and weight of 6.3 kg). Significant correlations were found between CVP values and all hepatic vein Doppler-based variables. The strongest correlation was found between CVP and the sum of the absolute values of the A- and D-wave peak velocities (AD velocity), with a ρ = 0.61 (95% confidence interval [CI] of 0.40 to 0.75; p < 0.001). The AD velocity > 38.55 cm/s was able to discriminate patients with CPV > 12 mmHg with a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 95.3%, positive predictive value of 83.3%, and negative predictive value of 100%. No correlations were observed between CVP and variables derived from IVC respiratory variability indices or the IVC/aorta ratio. Conclusion: Hepatic vein Doppler ultrasound provides variables that significantly correlate with CVP and may be useful for estimating cardiac preload in mechanically ventilated children. Indices derived from IVC ultrasound were not reliable for estimating CVP. What is known? • Increased central venous pressure (CVP) can cause interstitial edema and reduce vital organ perfusion, leading to organic dysfunctions, with encapsulated organs such as the kidneys and liver being at higher risk. • However, measuring CVP in children poses challenges due to the difficulties and risks of central venous catheterization, frequent partial or total luminal obstructions in venous catheters, and potential technical errors in measurements. What is new? • Variables obtained through hepatic vein Doppler ultrasonography outperformed those obtained by inferior vena cava ultrasound for estimating CVP in this population. • Hepatic vein Doppler ultrasonography holds potential as an accurate, safe, and non-invasive method for discriminating patients with increased cardiac preload.

用肝静脉多普勒超声估测机械通气患儿的中心静脉压力。
监测中心静脉压(CVP)对重症患者的管理至关重要,但在儿科病例中却面临挑战。本研究旨在将儿童的 CVP 与肝静脉多普勒和 IVC 超声波变量相关联。接受机械通气的儿童同时接受了超声和 CVP 测量。肝静脉多普勒评估峰值速度(A、S、V、D)和收缩期充盈分数。IVC 超声波包括呼吸变异指数、IVC/主动脉比率和 IVC/体表面积比率。共纳入 53 名儿童(中位年龄为 8.3 个月,体重为 6.3 千克)。研究发现,CVP 值与所有基于肝静脉多普勒的变量之间均存在显著相关性。CVP 与 A 波和 D 波峰值速度绝对值之和(AD 速度)之间的相关性最强,ρ = 0.61(95% 置信区间 [CI] 为 0.40 至 0.75;P 38.55 cm/s 能够区分 CPV > 12 mmHg 的患者,灵敏度为 100%,特异性为 95.3%,阳性预测值为 83.3%,阴性预测值为 100%。未观察到 CVP 与根据 IVC 呼吸变异性指数或 IVC/ 主动脉比值得出的变量之间存在相关性。结论肝静脉多普勒超声提供了与 CVP 显著相关的变量,可用于估计机械通气儿童的心脏前负荷。从 IVC 超声波得出的指标对于估计 CVP 并不可靠。已知信息- 中心静脉压(CVP)升高可引起间质水肿,减少重要器官的灌注,导致器质性功能障碍,肾脏和肝脏等包裹性器官的风险更高。- 然而,由于中心静脉导管插入术的困难和风险、静脉导管经常出现部分或全部管腔阻塞以及测量中可能出现的技术误差,测量儿童的 CVP 是一项挑战。新技术是什么?- 通过肝静脉多普勒超声检查获得的变量在估算该人群的 CVP 方面优于通过下腔静脉超声检查获得的变量。- 肝静脉多普勒超声检查有望成为一种准确、安全、无创的方法,用于鉴别心脏前负荷增加的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
2.80%
发文量
367
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Pediatrics (EJPE) is a leading peer-reviewed medical journal which covers the entire field of pediatrics. The editors encourage authors to submit original articles, reviews, short communications, and correspondence on all relevant themes and topics. EJPE is particularly committed to the publication of articles on important new clinical research that will have an immediate impact on clinical pediatric practice. The editorial office very much welcomes ideas for publications, whether individual articles or article series, that fit this goal and is always willing to address inquiries from authors regarding potential submissions. Invited review articles on clinical pediatrics that provide comprehensive coverage of a subject of importance are also regularly commissioned. The short publication time reflects both the commitment of the editors and publishers and their passion for new developments in the field of pediatrics. EJPE is active on social media (@EurJPediatrics) and we invite you to participate. EJPE is the official journal of the European Academy of Paediatrics (EAP) and publishes guidelines and statements in cooperation with the EAP.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信