Clinicoeconomic burden among heart failure patients with severely reduced ejection fraction after hospital admission: HF-RESTORE.

IF 5.4 3区 材料科学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
Heidi T May, Jeffrey L Anderson, Michael Butzner, Punag H Divanji, Joseph B Muhlestein
{"title":"Clinicoeconomic burden among heart failure patients with severely reduced ejection fraction after hospital admission: HF-RESTORE.","authors":"Heidi T May, Jeffrey L Anderson, Michael Butzner, Punag H Divanji, Joseph B Muhlestein","doi":"10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An estimated two-thirds of heart failure (HF) patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) hospitalized in the United States have a severely reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF < 30%). Few studies have categorized patients according to their severity of left ventricular dysfunction beyond an LVEF of < 30%.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Intermountain Health patients (≥18 years), with a primary HF diagnosis, ≥1 inpatient hospitalization with a primary discharge diagnosis of HF, a documented LVEF of < 30%, and a BNP > 100 pg/mL within one year of hospitalization were studied. Patients were stratified by LVEF levels (≤15%, 16-25%, and 26-29%) and evaluated for death, HF hospitalization, healthcare resource utilization, and medical costs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 2 184 patients (mean age 64.2 ± 15.5 years, 72.5% male) were stratified by LVEF (≤15%, n = 468 [21.4%]; 16-25%, n = 1399 [64.1%]; and 26-29%, n = 317 [14.5%]). Lower LVEF was associated with younger age, male sex, and fewer comorbidities. Although one-year mortality differed significantly between LVEF stratifications, which remained after adjustment by risk factors (vs. LVEF 26-29% [referent]): ≤15%, hazard ratio (HR)=1.92, p < 0.0001; and 16-25%, HR = 1.42, p = 0.01), mortality was similar by 3-years. HF hospitalizations at 1- and 3-years were similar among LVEF groups. Total HF costs-driven by increased HF outpatient costs-were significantly higher among LVEF of ≤ 15%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with an LVEF of ≤ 15% had a modestly increased risk of 1-year mortality, as well as significantly higher total HF costs. Patients with HFrEF and a severely reduced LVEF continue to face an increased clinicoeconomic burden, and novel therapies to treat this unmet medical need are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":4,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Energy Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Energy Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae081","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: An estimated two-thirds of heart failure (HF) patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) hospitalized in the United States have a severely reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF < 30%). Few studies have categorized patients according to their severity of left ventricular dysfunction beyond an LVEF of < 30%.

Methods: Intermountain Health patients (≥18 years), with a primary HF diagnosis, ≥1 inpatient hospitalization with a primary discharge diagnosis of HF, a documented LVEF of < 30%, and a BNP > 100 pg/mL within one year of hospitalization were studied. Patients were stratified by LVEF levels (≤15%, 16-25%, and 26-29%) and evaluated for death, HF hospitalization, healthcare resource utilization, and medical costs.

Results: Overall, 2 184 patients (mean age 64.2 ± 15.5 years, 72.5% male) were stratified by LVEF (≤15%, n = 468 [21.4%]; 16-25%, n = 1399 [64.1%]; and 26-29%, n = 317 [14.5%]). Lower LVEF was associated with younger age, male sex, and fewer comorbidities. Although one-year mortality differed significantly between LVEF stratifications, which remained after adjustment by risk factors (vs. LVEF 26-29% [referent]): ≤15%, hazard ratio (HR)=1.92, p < 0.0001; and 16-25%, HR = 1.42, p = 0.01), mortality was similar by 3-years. HF hospitalizations at 1- and 3-years were similar among LVEF groups. Total HF costs-driven by increased HF outpatient costs-were significantly higher among LVEF of ≤ 15%.

Conclusions: Patients with an LVEF of ≤ 15% had a modestly increased risk of 1-year mortality, as well as significantly higher total HF costs. Patients with HFrEF and a severely reduced LVEF continue to face an increased clinicoeconomic burden, and novel therapies to treat this unmet medical need are warranted.

入院后射血分数严重降低的心衰患者的临床经济负担:HF-RESTORE。
背景:据估计,美国三分之二的射血分数降低型心力衰竭(HF)住院患者的左心室射血分数(LVEF)严重降低:研究对象为 Intermountain Health 的患者(≥18 岁),主要诊断为心力衰竭,住院≥1 次且主要出院诊断为心力衰竭,住院一年内记录的 LVEF 为 100 pg/mL。根据 LVEF 水平(≤15%、16-25% 和 26-29%)对患者进行分层,并对死亡、HF 住院、医疗资源使用和医疗费用进行评估:共有 2 184 名患者(平均年龄为 64.2 ± 15.5 岁,72.5% 为男性)按 LVEF 分层(≤15%,468 人 [21.4%];16-25%,1399 人 [64.1%];26-29%,317 人 [14.5%])。LVEF 较低与年龄较小、男性和较少合并症有关。虽然 LVEF 分级之间的一年死亡率存在显著差异,但在根据风险因素进行调整后,这一差异依然存在(与 LVEF 26-29% [参考值]相比):≤15%,危险比 (HR)=1.92, p 结论:LVEF ≤ 15% 的患者死亡率较低,而 LVEF 26-29% [参考值]的患者死亡率较高:LVEF≤15%的患者1年死亡风险略有增加,HF总费用也显著增加。HFrEF 和 LVEF 严重减低的患者继续面临着更大的临床经济负担,因此需要新型疗法来治疗这一尚未满足的医疗需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Energy Materials
ACS Applied Energy Materials Materials Science-Materials Chemistry
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
1368
期刊介绍: ACS Applied Energy Materials is an interdisciplinary journal publishing original research covering all aspects of materials, engineering, chemistry, physics and biology relevant to energy conversion and storage. The journal is devoted to reports of new and original experimental and theoretical research of an applied nature that integrate knowledge in the areas of materials, engineering, physics, bioscience, and chemistry into important energy applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信