Detective flow imaging versus contrast-enhanced EUS in solid pancreatic lesions.

IF 4.4 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Endoscopic Ultrasound Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-23 DOI:10.1097/eus.0000000000000076
Maria Victoria Mulqui, Fabrice Caillol, Jean Philippe Ratone, Solène Hoibian, Yanis Dahel, Élise Meunier, Clément Archimbaud, Marc Giovannini
{"title":"Detective flow imaging <i>versus</i> contrast-enhanced EUS in solid pancreatic lesions.","authors":"Maria Victoria Mulqui, Fabrice Caillol, Jean Philippe Ratone, Solène Hoibian, Yanis Dahel, Élise Meunier, Clément Archimbaud, Marc Giovannini","doi":"10.1097/eus.0000000000000076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Detective flow imaging EUS (DFI-EUS) is a new technology that detects fine vessels and low-flow velocity without contrast agents, used in real time during EUS, with a better resolution compared to usual technologies such as color Doppler and eFLOW. The aim of this study was to compare DFI-EUS with contrast-enhanced EUS (CE-EUS) for the evaluation of vascularization in solid pancreatic lesions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included patients who had a pancreatic mass visualized by EUS, with recorded images of their assessment in DFI-EUS and CE-EUS techniques and a histological diagnosis confirmed malignant tumors or a minimum of 1-year follow-up for benign lesions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 107 patients included in this retrospective single-center study, the histological diagnosis revealed 69 cases (64.5%) of pancreatic adenocarcinoma, 18 cases (16.8%) of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), and 10 cases (9.3%) of metastases from nonpancreatic cancers. A smaller proportion (9.4%) exhibited other lesions. As a result, the incidence of intralesional microvascularization was 43.9% with DFI-EUS and 48.6% with CE-EUS, indicating a positive correlation between the 2 techniques (<i>P</i> = 0.0001). Compared to CE-EUS, DFI-EUS exhibited sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of 88.5%, 98.2%, 97.9%, and 90%, respectively, for the detection of intralesional vessels.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The novel technique DFI-EUS demonstrates a remarkable correlation with CE-EUS, exhibiting high sensitivity and specificity for the assessment of microvascularization in solid pancreatic lesions. This method eliminates the need for a contrast agent, thus carrying no risk of adverse effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":11577,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopic Ultrasound","volume":"13 4","pages":"248-252"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11419480/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endoscopic Ultrasound","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/eus.0000000000000076","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Detective flow imaging EUS (DFI-EUS) is a new technology that detects fine vessels and low-flow velocity without contrast agents, used in real time during EUS, with a better resolution compared to usual technologies such as color Doppler and eFLOW. The aim of this study was to compare DFI-EUS with contrast-enhanced EUS (CE-EUS) for the evaluation of vascularization in solid pancreatic lesions.

Methods: We included patients who had a pancreatic mass visualized by EUS, with recorded images of their assessment in DFI-EUS and CE-EUS techniques and a histological diagnosis confirmed malignant tumors or a minimum of 1-year follow-up for benign lesions.

Results: Of the 107 patients included in this retrospective single-center study, the histological diagnosis revealed 69 cases (64.5%) of pancreatic adenocarcinoma, 18 cases (16.8%) of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), and 10 cases (9.3%) of metastases from nonpancreatic cancers. A smaller proportion (9.4%) exhibited other lesions. As a result, the incidence of intralesional microvascularization was 43.9% with DFI-EUS and 48.6% with CE-EUS, indicating a positive correlation between the 2 techniques (P = 0.0001). Compared to CE-EUS, DFI-EUS exhibited sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of 88.5%, 98.2%, 97.9%, and 90%, respectively, for the detection of intralesional vessels.

Conclusions: The novel technique DFI-EUS demonstrates a remarkable correlation with CE-EUS, exhibiting high sensitivity and specificity for the assessment of microvascularization in solid pancreatic lesions. This method eliminates the need for a contrast agent, thus carrying no risk of adverse effects.

胰腺实性病变中的探查血流成像与对比增强 EUS。
背景和目的:探查血流成像 EUS(DFI-EUS)是一种无需造影剂即可检测细小血管和低流速的新技术,在 EUS 过程中实时使用,与彩色多普勒和 eFLOW 等常规技术相比具有更好的分辨率。本研究旨在比较 DFI-EUS 与造影剂增强 EUS(CE-EUS)对胰腺实体病变血管化的评估效果:我们纳入了通过 EUS 观察到胰腺肿块的患者,并记录了 DFI-EUS 和 CE-EUS 技术对其进行评估的图像,以及组织学诊断证实为恶性肿瘤或至少随访 1 年的良性病变患者:在这项回顾性单中心研究的107例患者中,组织学诊断显示69例(64.5%)为胰腺腺癌,18例(16.8%)为神经内分泌肿瘤(NET),10例(9.3%)为非胰腺癌转移。其他病变的比例较小(9.4%)。因此,DFI-EUS 的区域内微血管化发生率为 43.9%,CE-EUS 为 48.6%,表明这两种技术之间存在正相关性(P = 0.0001)。与CE-EUS相比,DFI-EUS检测内部血管的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)分别为88.5%、98.2%、97.9%和90%:结论:新技术DFI-EUS与CE-EUS具有显著的相关性,在评估胰腺实体病变微血管化方面表现出较高的灵敏度和特异性。这种方法无需使用造影剂,因此没有不良反应的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Endoscopic Ultrasound
Endoscopic Ultrasound GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
144
期刊介绍: Endoscopic Ultrasound, a publication of Euro-EUS Scientific Committee, Asia-Pacific EUS Task Force and Latin American Chapter of EUS, is a peer-reviewed online journal with Quarterly print on demand compilation of issues published. The journal’s full text is available online at http://www.eusjournal.com. The journal allows free access (Open Access) to its contents and permits authors to self-archive final accepted version of the articles on any OAI-compliant institutional / subject-based repository. The journal does not charge for submission, processing or publication of manuscripts and even for color reproduction of photographs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信