Impact of Needle Design and Suture Gauge on Tissue Tearing During Skin Suturing: A Comparative Analysis.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY
Dermatologic Surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-26 DOI:10.1097/DSS.0000000000004389
Christian T Potter, McKenzie E Maloney, Alexandria M Riopelle, Gary M Fudem, Carl F Schanbacher
{"title":"Impact of Needle Design and Suture Gauge on Tissue Tearing During Skin Suturing: A Comparative Analysis.","authors":"Christian T Potter, McKenzie E Maloney, Alexandria M Riopelle, Gary M Fudem, Carl F Schanbacher","doi":"10.1097/DSS.0000000000004389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgeons face numerous choices in selecting sutures for skin closure, with potential adverse effects such as tissue tearing.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the influence of needle design and suture gauge on tissue tearing during suturing procedures.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The authors tested the tear-through force in Newtons for 3 needle types and 3 suture gauges using an artificial skin model and a professional-grade tensiometer. Suture material was secured into the skin model, and force was applied to the suture at a constant rate, resulting in tearing. Force-displacement and force-time curves were generated. Evaluation included conventional cutting (PC-3), reverse cutting (PS-3), and taper point (BB) needles with a 5-0 polypropylene suture. In addition, nylon sutures with a reverse cutting needle (PS-2) were tested at 3 suture gauges (5-0, 4-0, 3-0).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean tear-through forces for PC-3, PS-3, and BB were 3.26 N, 3.75 N, and 4.07 N, respectively. For the 5-0, 4-0, and 3-0 nylon sutures, the mean tear-through forces were 3.44 N, 3.81 N, and 4.04 N, respectively. Statistical analysis revealed a significant impact of suture gauge size ( p < .001) and needle geometry ( p < .001) on tear-through force.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Larger suture diameter and taper needles minimize tissue tearing.</p>","PeriodicalId":11289,"journal":{"name":"Dermatologic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"148-151"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermatologic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000004389","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Surgeons face numerous choices in selecting sutures for skin closure, with potential adverse effects such as tissue tearing.

Objective: To investigate the influence of needle design and suture gauge on tissue tearing during suturing procedures.

Materials and methods: The authors tested the tear-through force in Newtons for 3 needle types and 3 suture gauges using an artificial skin model and a professional-grade tensiometer. Suture material was secured into the skin model, and force was applied to the suture at a constant rate, resulting in tearing. Force-displacement and force-time curves were generated. Evaluation included conventional cutting (PC-3), reverse cutting (PS-3), and taper point (BB) needles with a 5-0 polypropylene suture. In addition, nylon sutures with a reverse cutting needle (PS-2) were tested at 3 suture gauges (5-0, 4-0, 3-0).

Results: The mean tear-through forces for PC-3, PS-3, and BB were 3.26 N, 3.75 N, and 4.07 N, respectively. For the 5-0, 4-0, and 3-0 nylon sutures, the mean tear-through forces were 3.44 N, 3.81 N, and 4.04 N, respectively. Statistical analysis revealed a significant impact of suture gauge size ( p < .001) and needle geometry ( p < .001) on tear-through force.

Conclusion: Larger suture diameter and taper needles minimize tissue tearing.

缝针设计和缝线规格对皮肤缝合时组织撕裂的影响:对比分析
背景:外科医生在选择缝合线进行皮肤缝合时面临多种选择,可能会造成组织撕裂等不良影响:研究缝合针设计和缝合线规格对缝合过程中组织撕裂的影响:作者使用人工皮肤模型和专业级张力计测试了 3 种针型和 3 种缝线规格的撕裂力(以牛顿为单位)。将缝合材料固定在皮肤模型上,以恒定的速度向缝合线施加力,导致撕裂。生成力-位移和力-时间曲线。评估包括使用 5-0 聚丙烯缝合线的传统切割针 (PC-3)、反向切割针 (PS-3) 和锥尖针 (BB)。此外,还对使用反向切割针(PS-2)的尼龙缝合线进行了 3 种缝合线号(5-0、4-0、3-0)的测试:结果:PC-3、PS-3 和 BB 的平均撕裂力分别为 3.26 N、3.75 N 和 4.07 N。5-0、4-0 和 3-0 尼龙缝合线的平均撕脱力分别为 3.44 N、3.81 N 和 4.04 N。统计分析显示,缝合线规尺寸(p < .001)和缝针几何形状(p < .001)对撕脱力有显著影响:结论:较大的缝合线直径和锥形针能最大程度地减少组织撕裂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dermatologic Surgery
Dermatologic Surgery 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
547
期刊介绍: Exclusively devoted to dermatologic surgery, the Dermatologic Surgery journal publishes the most clinically comprehensive and up-to-date information in its field. This unique monthly journal provides today’s most expansive and in-depth coverage of cosmetic and reconstructive skin surgery and skin cancer through peer-reviewed original articles, extensive illustrations, case reports, ongoing features, literature reviews and correspondence. The journal provides information on the latest scientific information for all types of dermatologic surgery including: -Ambulatory phlebectomy- Blepharoplasty- Body contouring- Chemical peels- Cryosurgery- Curettage and desiccation- Dermabrasion- Excision and closure- Flap Surgery- Grafting- Hair restoration surgery- Injectable neuromodulators- Laser surgery- Liposuction- Microdermabrasion- Microlipoinjection- Micropigmentation- Mohs micrographic surgery- Nail surgery- Phlebology- Sclerotherapy- Skin cancer surgery- Skin resurfacing- Soft-tissue fillers. Dermatologists, dermatologic surgeons, plastic surgeons, oculoplastic surgeons and facial plastic surgeons consider this a must-read publication for anyone in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信