Association of age at diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus with the risks of the morbidity of cardiovascular disease, cancer and all-cause mortality: Evidence from a real-world study with a large population-based cohort study

IF 6.1 3区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Yuhao Li , Jinbin Luo , Kaifang Bao , Qiaohui Wei , Xiaohong Wang , Jieping Chen , Tao Zhang , Fengying Wang , Yimin Zhu
{"title":"Association of age at diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus with the risks of the morbidity of cardiovascular disease, cancer and all-cause mortality: Evidence from a real-world study with a large population-based cohort study","authors":"Yuhao Li ,&nbsp;Jinbin Luo ,&nbsp;Kaifang Bao ,&nbsp;Qiaohui Wei ,&nbsp;Xiaohong Wang ,&nbsp;Jieping Chen ,&nbsp;Tao Zhang ,&nbsp;Fengying Wang ,&nbsp;Yimin Zhu","doi":"10.1016/j.diabres.2024.111870","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><div>To investigate the impact of diagnosis age of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) on subsequent adverse outcomes within the Chinese population.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>549,959 eligible T2DM patients were included from Ningbo and Jinhua city in Zhejiang province, China. Standardized ratio was used to evaluate the risks of coronary heart disease (CHD), stroke, cancer and all-cause death in different T2DM diagnosis age groups.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>For all adverse outcomes, higher excess risks were observed in the youngest age group (30–39) than in the oldest age group (≥80) with T2DM. The standardized incidence ratios (SIR) were 5.93 (95% CI: 3.46, 10.14) for CHD, 5.45 (95% CI: 3.72, 7.99) for stroke and 1.85 (95% CI: 1.38, 2.49) for cancer in the youngest age group, and were 1.32 (95% CI: 1.08, 1.60) for CHD, 1.25 (95% CI: 1.08, 1.44) for stroke, and 0.78 (95% CI: 0.56, 1.09) for cancer, respectively, in the oldest age group. The standardized mortality ratios (SMR) for all-cause death were 3.15 (1.69, 5.84) vs. 1.12 (0.88, 1.43). These excess risks decreased with increasing diagnosis age (all P value &lt; 0.001). Consistent results were observed when individuals were stratified by sex or further excluded with the time from T2DM diagnosis to endpoints less than 1 or 2 years.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Th earlier the diagnosis of T2DM, the higher the risk for subsequent adverse outcomes. It is imperative to enhance the management and monitoring of early-onset patients during follow-up.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11249,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes research and clinical practice","volume":"217 ","pages":"Article 111870"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes research and clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168822724007800","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims

To investigate the impact of diagnosis age of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) on subsequent adverse outcomes within the Chinese population.

Methods

549,959 eligible T2DM patients were included from Ningbo and Jinhua city in Zhejiang province, China. Standardized ratio was used to evaluate the risks of coronary heart disease (CHD), stroke, cancer and all-cause death in different T2DM diagnosis age groups.

Results

For all adverse outcomes, higher excess risks were observed in the youngest age group (30–39) than in the oldest age group (≥80) with T2DM. The standardized incidence ratios (SIR) were 5.93 (95% CI: 3.46, 10.14) for CHD, 5.45 (95% CI: 3.72, 7.99) for stroke and 1.85 (95% CI: 1.38, 2.49) for cancer in the youngest age group, and were 1.32 (95% CI: 1.08, 1.60) for CHD, 1.25 (95% CI: 1.08, 1.44) for stroke, and 0.78 (95% CI: 0.56, 1.09) for cancer, respectively, in the oldest age group. The standardized mortality ratios (SMR) for all-cause death were 3.15 (1.69, 5.84) vs. 1.12 (0.88, 1.43). These excess risks decreased with increasing diagnosis age (all P value < 0.001). Consistent results were observed when individuals were stratified by sex or further excluded with the time from T2DM diagnosis to endpoints less than 1 or 2 years.

Conclusions

Th earlier the diagnosis of T2DM, the higher the risk for subsequent adverse outcomes. It is imperative to enhance the management and monitoring of early-onset patients during follow-up.

Abstract Image

确诊 2 型糖尿病时的年龄与心血管疾病、癌症和全因死亡率的发病风险之间的关系:一项基于大型人群队列研究的真实世界研究提供的证据。
目的:研究中国人群中2型糖尿病(T2DM)诊断年龄对后续不良结局的影响。方法:纳入浙江省宁波市和金华市549 959名符合条件的T2DM患者。结果:在所有不良后果中,T2DM 患者的超额风险越高,其不良后果越严重:结果:在所有不良后果中,T2DM 患者中最年轻年龄组(30-39 岁)的超额风险高于最年长年龄组(≥80 岁)。在最年轻的年龄组中,冠心病的标准化发病率(SIR)为 5.93 (95% CI: 3.46, 10.14),中风为 5.45 (95% CI: 3.72, 7.99),癌症为 1.85 (95% CI: 1.38, 2.49)。在最年长的年龄组中,冠心病、中风和癌症的标准化死亡率分别为 1.32(95% CI:1.08,1.60)、1.25(95% CI:1.08,1.44)和 0.78(95% CI:0.56,1.09)。全因死亡的标准化死亡率(SMR)为 3.15 (1.69, 5.84) vs. 1.12 (0.88, 1.43)。这些超额风险随着诊断年龄的增加而降低(均为 P 值):T2DM 诊断越早,随后出现不良后果的风险越高。在随访过程中加强对早发患者的管理和监测势在必行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diabetes research and clinical practice
Diabetes research and clinical practice 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
3.90%
发文量
862
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice is an international journal for health-care providers and clinically oriented researchers that publishes high-quality original research articles and expert reviews in diabetes and related areas. The role of the journal is to provide a venue for dissemination of knowledge and discussion of topics related to diabetes clinical research and patient care. Topics of focus include translational science, genetics, immunology, nutrition, psychosocial research, epidemiology, prevention, socio-economic research, complications, new treatments, technologies and therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信