Extended anticoagulation after venous thromboembolism.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Rasmus Laursen, Hanne M Søndergaard, Pia Børding, Dorthe Svenstrup
{"title":"Extended anticoagulation after venous thromboembolism.","authors":"Rasmus Laursen, Hanne M Søndergaard, Pia Børding, Dorthe Svenstrup","doi":"10.61409/A01240063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Venous thromboembolism (VTE) carries a high risk of recurrence, and this risk is strongly related to the nature of the index event. Thus, extended anticoagulation treatment is recommended for patients with a high recurrence risk and should be considered for patients with an intermediate risk. This study aimed to provide insight into the clinical practice of extended anticoagulation for VTE patients METHODS. This was a retrospective study of VTE patients covering the period from January 2020 through June 2021. We categorised patients by their estimated risk of recurrence as low (less-than 3% per year), intermediate (3-8% per year) or high (> 8% per year). The decision to stop or extend anticoagulation was made in a multidisciplinary VTE clinic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 343 patients were included; 315 patients were eligible for analysis. The majority of patients (58.7%) had an intermediate recurrence risk. In total 80.3% received extended treatment. The use was highest (97.9%) among patients with a high recurrence risk, whereas 82.7% with an intermediate risk and 15.2% with a low risk received extended therapy. Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants were preferred for extended therapy (82.2%), whereas 5.1% received warfarin and 12.6% low molecular weight heparin.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this real-world clinic, the majority of VTE patients switched to extended treatment after initial standard anticoagulation. The role of patient and physician preference as determinants driving this decision should be investigated further.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>This study received an unrestricted grant from Bayer, which had no involvement in the study design, data collection, analysis, or manuscript preparation.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Not relevant.</p>","PeriodicalId":11119,"journal":{"name":"Danish medical journal","volume":"71 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Danish medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61409/A01240063","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) carries a high risk of recurrence, and this risk is strongly related to the nature of the index event. Thus, extended anticoagulation treatment is recommended for patients with a high recurrence risk and should be considered for patients with an intermediate risk. This study aimed to provide insight into the clinical practice of extended anticoagulation for VTE patients METHODS. This was a retrospective study of VTE patients covering the period from January 2020 through June 2021. We categorised patients by their estimated risk of recurrence as low (less-than 3% per year), intermediate (3-8% per year) or high (> 8% per year). The decision to stop or extend anticoagulation was made in a multidisciplinary VTE clinic.

Results: A total of 343 patients were included; 315 patients were eligible for analysis. The majority of patients (58.7%) had an intermediate recurrence risk. In total 80.3% received extended treatment. The use was highest (97.9%) among patients with a high recurrence risk, whereas 82.7% with an intermediate risk and 15.2% with a low risk received extended therapy. Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants were preferred for extended therapy (82.2%), whereas 5.1% received warfarin and 12.6% low molecular weight heparin.

Conclusions: In this real-world clinic, the majority of VTE patients switched to extended treatment after initial standard anticoagulation. The role of patient and physician preference as determinants driving this decision should be investigated further.

Funding: This study received an unrestricted grant from Bayer, which had no involvement in the study design, data collection, analysis, or manuscript preparation.

Trial registration: Not relevant.

静脉血栓栓塞后的延长抗凝治疗。
导言:静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)具有很高的复发风险,这种风险与指数事件的性质密切相关。因此,建议复发风险高的患者延长抗凝治疗时间,而中度风险的患者则应考虑延长抗凝治疗时间。本研究旨在深入了解 VTE 患者延长抗凝治疗的临床实践。 本研究是一项回顾性研究,研究对象为 2020 年 1 月至 2021 年 6 月期间的 VTE 患者。我们根据患者的估计复发风险将其分为低风险(每年低于 3%)、中风险(每年 3-8%)和高风险(每年大于 8%)。停止或延长抗凝治疗的决定由多学科 VTE 诊所做出:共纳入 343 例患者,其中 315 例符合分析条件。大多数患者(58.7%)的复发风险处于中等水平。共有 80.3% 的患者接受了延长治疗。复发风险高的患者接受延长治疗的比例最高(97.9%),而中度风险和低风险患者接受延长治疗的比例分别为 82.7% 和 15.2%。延长治疗首选非维生素 K 拮抗剂口服抗凝药(82.2%),5.1%接受华法林治疗,12.6%接受低分子量肝素治疗:结论:在这个真实世界的诊所中,大多数 VTE 患者在最初的标准抗凝治疗后转为延长治疗。应进一步研究患者和医生的偏好对这一决定的决定性作用:本研究获得了拜耳公司的无限制资助,拜耳公司未参与研究设计、数据收集、分析或稿件撰写:试验注册:不相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Danish medical journal
Danish medical journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
78
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Danish Medical Journal (DMJ) is a general medical journal. The journal publish original research in English – conducted in or in relation to the Danish health-care system. When writing for the Danish Medical Journal please remember target audience which is the general reader. This means that the research area should be relevant to many readers and the paper should be presented in a way that most readers will understand the content. DMJ will publish the following articles: • Original articles • Protocol articles from large randomized clinical trials • Systematic reviews and meta-analyses • PhD theses from Danish faculties of health sciences • DMSc theses from Danish faculties of health sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信