The Causal Role of Uterine Fibroid in Keloid and Hypertrophic Scar: A Bidirectional Mendelian Randomization Study on European Populations.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q4 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Xiaobo Zhou, Jui-Ming Lin, Hui Wang, Yiyi Gong, Jinran Lin, Wenyu Wu, Jia Huang
{"title":"The Causal Role of Uterine Fibroid in Keloid and Hypertrophic Scar: A Bidirectional Mendelian Randomization Study on European Populations.","authors":"Xiaobo Zhou, Jui-Ming Lin, Hui Wang, Yiyi Gong, Jinran Lin, Wenyu Wu, Jia Huang","doi":"10.2174/0113892010326633240911062613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The relationship between uterine fibroids and keloid/hypertrophic scars has been contradictory. Our research employs a bidirectional Mendelian Randomization (MR) approach to establish a clearer understanding of this potential causal link.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to determine the effect of uterine fibroids on keloid/hypertrophic scars and the effect of keloid/hypertrophic scars on uterine fibroids.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We aimed to demonstrate the relationship between uterine fibroids and keloid/ hypertrophic scars.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Our bidirectional MR study utilized summarized data from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) focused on European populations. Our primary tool for establishing causality was the Inverse-Variance Weighted (IVW) method. To reinforce the IVW findings, we also applied four alternative MR methods: MR-Egger, Maximum Likelihood, Weighted Mode, and Weighted Median.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The IVW method indicated a significant causal link, with uterine fibroids greatly raising the likelihood of developing keloids (Odds Ratio [OR] = 1.202, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.045-1.381; P=0.010) and hypertrophic scars (OR = 1.256, 95% CI: 1.039-1.519; P=0.018). Parallel results were observed with the MR-Egger, Maximum Likelihood, Weighted Mode, and Weighted Median methods. Sensitivity analyses indicated robustness in these findings, with no evidence of heterogeneity or horizontal pleiotropy. Conversely, the reverse MR analysis did not demonstrate an increased risk of uterine fibroids due to keloids or hypertrophic scars.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study elucidates a significant causal effect of uterine fibroids on the development of keloid and hypertrophic scars, offering valuable insights into their pathogenesis and potential therapeutic targets.</p>","PeriodicalId":10881,"journal":{"name":"Current pharmaceutical biotechnology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current pharmaceutical biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0113892010326633240911062613","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The relationship between uterine fibroids and keloid/hypertrophic scars has been contradictory. Our research employs a bidirectional Mendelian Randomization (MR) approach to establish a clearer understanding of this potential causal link.

Objective: This study aimed to determine the effect of uterine fibroids on keloid/hypertrophic scars and the effect of keloid/hypertrophic scars on uterine fibroids.

Purpose: We aimed to demonstrate the relationship between uterine fibroids and keloid/ hypertrophic scars.

Method: Our bidirectional MR study utilized summarized data from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) focused on European populations. Our primary tool for establishing causality was the Inverse-Variance Weighted (IVW) method. To reinforce the IVW findings, we also applied four alternative MR methods: MR-Egger, Maximum Likelihood, Weighted Mode, and Weighted Median.

Result: The IVW method indicated a significant causal link, with uterine fibroids greatly raising the likelihood of developing keloids (Odds Ratio [OR] = 1.202, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.045-1.381; P=0.010) and hypertrophic scars (OR = 1.256, 95% CI: 1.039-1.519; P=0.018). Parallel results were observed with the MR-Egger, Maximum Likelihood, Weighted Mode, and Weighted Median methods. Sensitivity analyses indicated robustness in these findings, with no evidence of heterogeneity or horizontal pleiotropy. Conversely, the reverse MR analysis did not demonstrate an increased risk of uterine fibroids due to keloids or hypertrophic scars.

Conclusion: This study elucidates a significant causal effect of uterine fibroids on the development of keloid and hypertrophic scars, offering valuable insights into their pathogenesis and potential therapeutic targets.

子宫肌瘤在瘢痕疙瘩和肥厚性瘢痕中的因果作用:欧洲人群的双向孟德尔随机研究
背景:子宫肌瘤与瘢痕疙瘩/肥厚性疤痕之间的关系一直存在矛盾。我们的研究采用了双向孟德尔随机化(MR)方法,以更清楚地了解这种潜在的因果关系:本研究旨在确定子宫肌瘤对瘢痕疙瘩/增生性疤痕的影响,以及瘢痕疙瘩/增生性疤痕对子宫肌瘤的影响。目的:我们旨在证明子宫肌瘤与瘢痕疙瘩/增生性疤痕之间的关系:我们的双向磁共振研究利用了以欧洲人群为重点的全基因组关联研究(GWAS)的汇总数据。我们确定因果关系的主要工具是逆方差加权法(IVW)。为了加强 IVW 的研究结果,我们还采用了四种可供选择的 MR 方法:MR-Egger、最大似然法、加权模式法和加权中值法:结果:IVW 方法表明,子宫肌瘤与瘢痕疙瘩(Odds Ratio [OR] = 1.202,95% 置信区间[CI]:1.045-1.381;P=0.010)和增生性疤痕(OR = 1.256,95% 置信区间[CI]:1.039-1.519;P=0.018)有明显的因果关系。MR-Egger法、最大似然法、加权模式法和加权中值法也得出了相似的结果。敏感性分析表明,这些结果具有稳健性,没有证据表明存在异质性或水平多向性。相反,反向磁共振分析并未显示瘢痕疙瘩或增生性疤痕会增加子宫肌瘤的风险:本研究阐明了子宫肌瘤对瘢痕疙瘩和增生性疤痕发展的重要因果效应,为了解其发病机制和潜在治疗目标提供了宝贵的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current pharmaceutical biotechnology
Current pharmaceutical biotechnology 医学-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.60%
发文量
203
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Current Pharmaceutical Biotechnology aims to cover all the latest and outstanding developments in Pharmaceutical Biotechnology. Each issue of the journal includes timely in-depth reviews, original research articles and letters written by leaders in the field, covering a range of current topics in scientific areas of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology. Invited and unsolicited review articles are welcome. The journal encourages contributions describing research at the interface of drug discovery and pharmacological applications, involving in vitro investigations and pre-clinical or clinical studies. Scientific areas within the scope of the journal include pharmaceutical chemistry, biochemistry and genetics, molecular and cellular biology, and polymer and materials sciences as they relate to pharmaceutical science and biotechnology. In addition, the journal also considers comprehensive studies and research advances pertaining food chemistry with pharmaceutical implication. Areas of interest include: DNA/protein engineering and processing Synthetic biotechnology Omics (genomics, proteomics, metabolomics and systems biology) Therapeutic biotechnology (gene therapy, peptide inhibitors, enzymes) Drug delivery and targeting Nanobiotechnology Molecular pharmaceutics and molecular pharmacology Analytical biotechnology (biosensing, advanced technology for detection of bioanalytes) Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics Applied Microbiology Bioinformatics (computational biopharmaceutics and modeling) Environmental biotechnology Regenerative medicine (stem cells, tissue engineering and biomaterials) Translational immunology (cell therapies, antibody engineering, xenotransplantation) Industrial bioprocesses for drug production and development Biosafety Biotech ethics Special Issues devoted to crucial topics, providing the latest comprehensive information on cutting-edge areas of research and technological advances, are welcome. Current Pharmaceutical Biotechnology is an essential journal for academic, clinical, government and pharmaceutical scientists who wish to be kept informed and up-to-date with the latest and most important developments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信